Accumulation, authority, and the cultural lives of objects: materiality and ancient religion

IF 0.2 0 RELIGION
S. Blakely
{"title":"Accumulation, authority, and the cultural lives of objects: materiality and ancient religion","authors":"S. Blakely","doi":"10.1515/arege-2020-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Material objects enable human relationships – with other humans, with objects themselves, and with the propositional world of the divine. Humanistic frameworks for the study of materiality have deep roots, from Locke and Tylor’s nineteenth century debates on the boundaries between the human soul and the material world through Bourdieu’s concept of habitus.1 More recently, a hubbub of monographs and scholarly articles on cultures from the American Southwest to India, Mesoamerica, and Europe attest the commitment to approach human religiosity as constituted in and through the material world.2 Agency, affect, textual reflections on material force, magic, spatiality, and ritual implements emerge as repeated themes across these different cultural traditions. The four articles collected here bring the focus to ancient Mediterranean votive, ritual, and magical practice: time, memory, authority, and the confirmation of social groups run as a thread among them, confirming the productivity of materiality as a framework for comparison across discrete material types as well as cultural settings.3 K.A. Rask focuses on accumulation, placement, and familiarity as intersecting factors in the phenomenology of votive practice. The low cost and mass production of the materials, combined with the habitus of well-worn pathways, forges connections between viewers and their predecessors, in whose actions they recognized their own. Clutter is a dynamic, affective spectacle that yields a community of visitors joined by common action, common image, and common space, but through the passage of time rather than a shared temporal frame. Dina Boero addresses distribution rather than accumulation, tracing the cultural biography of pilgrimage tokens from ancient commodity to modern objects with heritage status at risk of destruction and theft. The tokens were the materialized “eulogia” of a single saint and a remembered journey, capable of authorizing applications from cleansing, medicine, and magic to late antique churches. The latter relied on patterns of deposition that invert the highly visi-","PeriodicalId":29740,"journal":{"name":"Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte","volume":"21-22 1","pages":"125 - 126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/arege-2020-0006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv fur Religionsgeschichte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/arege-2020-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Material objects enable human relationships – with other humans, with objects themselves, and with the propositional world of the divine. Humanistic frameworks for the study of materiality have deep roots, from Locke and Tylor’s nineteenth century debates on the boundaries between the human soul and the material world through Bourdieu’s concept of habitus.1 More recently, a hubbub of monographs and scholarly articles on cultures from the American Southwest to India, Mesoamerica, and Europe attest the commitment to approach human religiosity as constituted in and through the material world.2 Agency, affect, textual reflections on material force, magic, spatiality, and ritual implements emerge as repeated themes across these different cultural traditions. The four articles collected here bring the focus to ancient Mediterranean votive, ritual, and magical practice: time, memory, authority, and the confirmation of social groups run as a thread among them, confirming the productivity of materiality as a framework for comparison across discrete material types as well as cultural settings.3 K.A. Rask focuses on accumulation, placement, and familiarity as intersecting factors in the phenomenology of votive practice. The low cost and mass production of the materials, combined with the habitus of well-worn pathways, forges connections between viewers and their predecessors, in whose actions they recognized their own. Clutter is a dynamic, affective spectacle that yields a community of visitors joined by common action, common image, and common space, but through the passage of time rather than a shared temporal frame. Dina Boero addresses distribution rather than accumulation, tracing the cultural biography of pilgrimage tokens from ancient commodity to modern objects with heritage status at risk of destruction and theft. The tokens were the materialized “eulogia” of a single saint and a remembered journey, capable of authorizing applications from cleansing, medicine, and magic to late antique churches. The latter relied on patterns of deposition that invert the highly visi-
物品的积累、权威和文化生活:物质性和古代宗教
物质对象使人类与他人、与对象本身以及与神圣的命题世界建立关系。研究物质性的人文主义框架有着深厚的根基,从洛克和泰勒在19世纪通过布迪厄的习惯概念对人类灵魂和物质世界之间界限的争论开始最近,从美国西南部到印度、中美洲和欧洲,关于文化的专著和学术文章的喧嚣证明了在物质世界中形成并通过物质世界来接近人类宗教的承诺在这些不同的文化传统中,代理、情感、对物质力量的文本反思、魔法、空间性和仪式工具作为重复的主题出现。这里收集的四篇文章将重点放在古代地中海的祈祷、仪式和魔法实践上:时间、记忆、权威和社会群体的确认作为一条线索在它们之间运行,确认了物质的生产力作为一个框架,可以在离散的物质类型和文化背景之间进行比较k·a·拉斯克(K.A. Rask)专注于将积累、放置和熟悉作为祈祷实践现象学中的交叉因素。材料的低成本和大规模生产,加上陈旧路径的习惯,在观众和他们的前辈之间建立了联系,他们在前辈的行动中认识到自己。杂乱是一种动态的、情感的景观,它产生了一个由共同的行动、共同的形象和共同的空间连接起来的游客社区,但通过时间的流逝而不是共享的时间框架。Dina Boero关注的是分配而不是积累,从古代商品到具有破坏和盗窃风险的遗产地位的现代物品,追溯了朝圣代币的文化传记。这些代币是一位圣人的物化“悼词”和一段记忆之旅,能够授权从清洁,药物和魔法到晚期古董教堂的应用。后者依赖于沉积模式,这种模式颠倒了高能见度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信