Transition readiness measures for adolescents and young adults with chronic health conditions: a systematic review

Sarah Parfeniuk, K. Petrovic, Peggy Lynn MacIsaac, K. Cook, G. Rempel
{"title":"Transition readiness measures for adolescents and young adults with chronic health conditions: a systematic review","authors":"Sarah Parfeniuk, K. Petrovic, Peggy Lynn MacIsaac, K. Cook, G. Rempel","doi":"10.1515/jtm-2020-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Transition from pediatric to adult healthcare for adolescents with chronic health conditions has emerged as a critical period influencing health outcomes. Suitable transition readiness measures are necessary to facilitate effective planning. Currently, there is little consensus about well-validated transition readiness measures. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify best practices in transition readiness measurement for adolescents and young adults with chronic health conditions. Data sources Academic databases searched included PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Google Scholar and Athabasca University Library’s Discover. Study selection Articles were included that discussed the development and psychometric properties of transition readiness measures for adolescents and young adults (11–25 years) with chronic health conditions and/or that utilized a previously developed measure. Data extraction The primary and secondary reviewers extracted data from the selected articles as per the data extraction tool developed for this review. Results Forty-eight articles, representing 19 tools, were included in the review. Ten of the tools were disease-specific; nine were disease-neutral. According to the Cohen criteria, eight measures were “well-established assessments”. The Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire was deemed the best measure of transition readiness available. The literature search included only articles published in peer-reviewed journals; measures nearing completion or awaiting publication were not included. In addition, only English manuscripts were included, many from North America. Conclusions Despite national practice guidelines and ongoing policy development, there is slow movement towards achieving a gold standard or best-practice measure of transition readiness.","PeriodicalId":93792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transition medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/jtm-2020-0020","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of transition medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jtm-2020-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Abstract Background Transition from pediatric to adult healthcare for adolescents with chronic health conditions has emerged as a critical period influencing health outcomes. Suitable transition readiness measures are necessary to facilitate effective planning. Currently, there is little consensus about well-validated transition readiness measures. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify best practices in transition readiness measurement for adolescents and young adults with chronic health conditions. Data sources Academic databases searched included PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Google Scholar and Athabasca University Library’s Discover. Study selection Articles were included that discussed the development and psychometric properties of transition readiness measures for adolescents and young adults (11–25 years) with chronic health conditions and/or that utilized a previously developed measure. Data extraction The primary and secondary reviewers extracted data from the selected articles as per the data extraction tool developed for this review. Results Forty-eight articles, representing 19 tools, were included in the review. Ten of the tools were disease-specific; nine were disease-neutral. According to the Cohen criteria, eight measures were “well-established assessments”. The Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire was deemed the best measure of transition readiness available. The literature search included only articles published in peer-reviewed journals; measures nearing completion or awaiting publication were not included. In addition, only English manuscripts were included, many from North America. Conclusions Despite national practice guidelines and ongoing policy development, there is slow movement towards achieving a gold standard or best-practice measure of transition readiness.
有慢性健康状况的青少年和青壮年的过渡准备措施:系统回顾
背景:对于患有慢性疾病的青少年来说,从儿科到成人医疗保健的转变已经成为影响健康结果的关键时期。适当的过渡准备措施是必要的,以促进有效的规划。目前,对于经过充分验证的过渡准备措施几乎没有达成共识。本系统综述的目的是确定对有慢性健康状况的青少年和年轻人进行转变准备测量的最佳做法。检索的学术数据库包括PubMed、护理和相关健康文献累积索引、谷歌Scholar和阿萨巴斯卡大学图书馆的Discover。研究选择纳入了讨论有慢性健康状况的青少年和年轻人(11-25岁)的转变准备措施的发展和心理测量特性和/或使用先前开发的措施的文章。数据提取主要和次要审稿人根据为本次综述开发的数据提取工具从选定的文章中提取数据。结果共纳入48篇文献,19种工具。其中10种工具是针对特定疾病的;其中9例无疾病。根据科恩的标准,有8项措施是“行之有效的评估”。转型准备评估问卷被认为是转型准备的最佳测量方法。文献检索只包括发表在同行评议期刊上的文章;未包括即将完成或等待出版的措施。此外,只有英文手稿被包括在内,许多来自北美。尽管有国家实践指南和正在制定的政策,但在实现过渡准备程度的黄金标准或最佳实践措施方面进展缓慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信