The Genesis of Political Distrust Towards the “Sixty-Eighters” in Czech Politics Over the Course of 1989

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Kristina Andělová
{"title":"The Genesis of Political Distrust Towards the “Sixty-Eighters” in Czech Politics Over the Course of 1989","authors":"Kristina Andělová","doi":"10.31577/forhist.2021.15.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ANDĚLOVÁ, Kristina. The Genesis of Political Distrust Towards the “Sixty-Eighters” in Czech Politics Over the Course of 1989. This article focuses on the genesis of political distrust against the so-called sixty-eighters—former reform communists—after 1989, outlining in detail the political trajectories of the Prague Spring communist actors. These politicians—the so-called socialist opposition—represented an important part of the Czechoslovak democratic opposition in the 1970s and 1980s. Even though many of the reform communists also stood at the inception of Charter 77, non-communist dissent was politically distrustful of the socialist opposition, centred around the journal Listy. Unlike the “non-political” Charter 77, Czechoslovak socialist opposition has always advocated for a profiled political program of democratic socialism. Thus, this distrust towards the reform communists persisted after 1989. In a situation where Marxism and socialism had completely lost political power and much of society rejected the socialist left as a dangerous remnant of the communist dictatorship, the advocates of post-communist democratic socialism found themselves on the margins of political discourse.","PeriodicalId":37228,"journal":{"name":"Forum Historiae","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forum Historiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31577/forhist.2021.15.2.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ANDĚLOVÁ, Kristina. The Genesis of Political Distrust Towards the “Sixty-Eighters” in Czech Politics Over the Course of 1989. This article focuses on the genesis of political distrust against the so-called sixty-eighters—former reform communists—after 1989, outlining in detail the political trajectories of the Prague Spring communist actors. These politicians—the so-called socialist opposition—represented an important part of the Czechoslovak democratic opposition in the 1970s and 1980s. Even though many of the reform communists also stood at the inception of Charter 77, non-communist dissent was politically distrustful of the socialist opposition, centred around the journal Listy. Unlike the “non-political” Charter 77, Czechoslovak socialist opposition has always advocated for a profiled political program of democratic socialism. Thus, this distrust towards the reform communists persisted after 1989. In a situation where Marxism and socialism had completely lost political power and much of society rejected the socialist left as a dangerous remnant of the communist dictatorship, the advocates of post-communist democratic socialism found themselves on the margins of political discourse.
1989年捷克政治中对“六八派”政治不信任的成因
和ĚLOVÁ,克里斯蒂娜。1989年捷克政治中对“六十个女儿”的政治不信任的成因。这篇文章聚焦于1989年后对所谓的“六十八人”(前改革共产主义者)的政治不信任的起源,详细概述了布拉格之春共产主义者的政治轨迹。这些政客——所谓的社会主义反对派——代表了20世纪70年代和80年代捷克斯洛伐克民主反对派的重要组成部分。尽管许多改革派共产主义者在《77国宪章》成立之初也站在了一边,但非共产主义异见人士在政治上不信任以《Listy》杂志为中心的社会主义反对派。与“非政治性”《77国宪章》不同,捷克斯洛伐克社会主义反对派一直主张民主社会主义的特色政治纲领。因此,这种对改革派共产党人的不信任在1989年之后持续存在。在马克思主义和社会主义已经完全失去政治权力,社会上许多人拒绝将社会主义左派视为共产主义独裁政权的危险残余的情况下,后共产主义民主社会主义的倡导者发现自己处于政治话语的边缘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forum Historiae
Forum Historiae Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信