It Is Probably Fake but Let Us Share It! Role of Analytical Thinking, Overclaiming and Social Approval in Sharing Fake News

IF 1.5 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Emad Rahmanian, M. Esfidani
{"title":"It Is Probably Fake but Let Us Share It! Role of Analytical Thinking, Overclaiming and Social Approval in Sharing Fake News","authors":"Emad Rahmanian, M. Esfidani","doi":"10.1177/09732586221116464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates whether and how analytical thinking, overclaiming, and social approval are associated with the intention of sharing fake news on social media. To randomize each respondent to a group and treatment and to test of several hypotheses simultaneously, two by two factorial design was used. An online survey (N = 1160) on Iranian social media revealed that overclaiming and social approval are positively related to sharing fake news on social media. Surprisingly, analytical thinking yielded no significance. We believe that in order to show more knowledge users tend to share information with high social approval irrespective of their credibility. Although CRT proved no relation with sharing, significant differences among male and female users were found. The proven relation between sharing more and overclaiming more reveals a marketing opportunity. Gamification of communication which provides a vehicle for users to overclaim their knowledge to their peers on social media might be a suitable strategy on social media to spread the message.","PeriodicalId":43888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creative Communications","volume":"18 1","pages":"7 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creative Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09732586221116464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This study investigates whether and how analytical thinking, overclaiming, and social approval are associated with the intention of sharing fake news on social media. To randomize each respondent to a group and treatment and to test of several hypotheses simultaneously, two by two factorial design was used. An online survey (N = 1160) on Iranian social media revealed that overclaiming and social approval are positively related to sharing fake news on social media. Surprisingly, analytical thinking yielded no significance. We believe that in order to show more knowledge users tend to share information with high social approval irrespective of their credibility. Although CRT proved no relation with sharing, significant differences among male and female users were found. The proven relation between sharing more and overclaiming more reveals a marketing opportunity. Gamification of communication which provides a vehicle for users to overclaim their knowledge to their peers on social media might be a suitable strategy on social media to spread the message.
这可能是假的,但让我们分享吧!分析思维、夸大和社会认同在假新闻分享中的作用
本研究调查了分析思维、过度抱怨和社会认可是否以及如何与在社交媒体上分享假新闻的意图相关。为了将每个受试者随机分为一组和一组治疗,并同时检验几个假设,采用了二乘二析因设计。一项针对伊朗社交媒体的在线调查(N=1160)显示,过度抱怨和社会认可与在社交媒体上分享假新闻呈正相关。令人惊讶的是,分析思维没有产生任何意义。我们认为,为了展示更多的知识,用户倾向于分享具有高度社会认可度的信息,而不管其可信度如何。尽管CRT与共享没有关系,但男性和女性用户之间存在显著差异。事实证明,多分享和多索取之间的关系揭示了一个营销机会。通信的游戏化为用户在社交媒体上向同龄人过度宣传自己的知识提供了一种工具,这可能是社交媒体上传播信息的合适策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
26.70%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Journal of Creative Communications promotes inquiry into contemporary communication issues within wider social, economic, marketing, cultural, technological and management contexts, and provides a forum for the discussion of theoretical and practical insights emerging from such inquiry. The journal encourages a new language of analysis for contemporary communications research and publishes articles dealing with innovative and alternate ways of doing research that push the frontiers of conceptual dialogue in communication theory and practice. The journal engages with a wide range of issues and themes in the areas of cultural studies, digital media, media studies, technoculture, marketing communication, organizational communication, communication management, mass and new media, and development communication, among others. JOCC is a double blind peer reviewed journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信