Linear trend or graded association: an international study of objective and subjective socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Fang Gong, Jun Xu
{"title":"Linear trend or graded association: an international study of objective and subjective socioeconomic inequalities in self-rated health","authors":"Fang Gong, Jun Xu","doi":"10.1080/02732173.2020.1753133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Despite the well-documented socioeconomic inequalities in health, it is less known about how objective and subjective socioeconomic statuses (SES) are related to self-rated health (SRH) in an international context. Using data from the 2007 International Social Survey Program (ISSP) that included 33 countries across six continents (N = 40,049), we found that for objective SES, either education or income, or both were related to SRH as general linear trends (i.e., higher SES was associated with better SRH as a general trend) rather than graded associations (i.e., adjacent levels of SES were associated with SRH in a dose–response relationship). After controlling for subjective SES, the magnitude of the associations between objective SES and SRH reduced, whereas the associations between subjective SES and SRH remained strong in nearly all countries. Findings suggested that more rigorous analyses are needed to clearly describe the SES-health associations, and future international research should expand to include subjective measures of SES.","PeriodicalId":47106,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Spectrum","volume":"40 1","pages":"191 - 207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02732173.2020.1753133","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2020.1753133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Despite the well-documented socioeconomic inequalities in health, it is less known about how objective and subjective socioeconomic statuses (SES) are related to self-rated health (SRH) in an international context. Using data from the 2007 International Social Survey Program (ISSP) that included 33 countries across six continents (N = 40,049), we found that for objective SES, either education or income, or both were related to SRH as general linear trends (i.e., higher SES was associated with better SRH as a general trend) rather than graded associations (i.e., adjacent levels of SES were associated with SRH in a dose–response relationship). After controlling for subjective SES, the magnitude of the associations between objective SES and SRH reduced, whereas the associations between subjective SES and SRH remained strong in nearly all countries. Findings suggested that more rigorous analyses are needed to clearly describe the SES-health associations, and future international research should expand to include subjective measures of SES.
线性趋势或分级关联:自我评价健康中客观和主观社会经济不平等的国际研究
尽管健康方面的社会经济不平等有充分的证据,但在国际背景下,客观和主观社会经济地位(SES)与自我评价健康(SRH)之间的关系尚不清楚。使用2007年国际社会调查计划(ISSP)的数据,包括六大洲33个国家(N = 4049),我们发现,对于客观的SES,教育或收入,或两者都与SRH相关,作为一般线性趋势(即,较高的SES与较好的SRH相关,作为一般趋势),而不是等级关联(即,相邻的SES水平与SRH相关,以剂量-反应关系)。在控制主观SES之后,客观SES和SRH之间的关联程度降低,而主观SES和SRH之间的关联在几乎所有国家都保持强劲。研究结果表明,需要更严格的分析来清楚地描述SES与健康的关联,未来的国际研究应扩大到包括SES的主观测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Sociological Spectrum publishes papers on theoretical, methodological, quantitative and qualitative research, and applied research in areas of sociology, social psychology, anthropology, and political science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信