Wie adaptiv ist Sprachförderung für Kinder mit Deutsch als Zweitsprache?

Q2 Arts and Humanities
S. Geyer, Anja Müller
{"title":"Wie adaptiv ist Sprachförderung für Kinder mit Deutsch als Zweitsprache?","authors":"S. Geyer, Anja Müller","doi":"10.1515/zfal-2021-2052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper focuses on the definition, operationalization and empirical investigation of adaptivity in the context of language training. We discuss a study that aimed at answering the question whether kindergarten teachers adapt their language to the specific needs of children with German as a second language in language training situations. Specifically, we investigated whether teachers use subordinate clauses and specific language training techniques to present or elicit subordinate clauses more frequently when working with children who had not yet acquired subordinate clauses than teachers supporting children who already had. Fifteen teachers were videotaped during language support sessions. Ten children who were supported during these sessions had not yet acquired subordinate clauses (n = 18), the other five teachers supported children with no additional needs in this area (n = 7). The teachers’ language was analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively in terms of the frequency of use of different subordinate clauses (e. g. position of the verb, subordinating conjunctions, different types of clauses) and the use of language support techniques (e. g. corrective feedback, expansions, questions) that aimed at presenting or eliciting subordinate clauses. A comparison of the two groups showed no differences in the teachers’ language depending on whether they supported children with or without additional needs regarding subordinate clauses. Therefore, the teachers’ language cannot be considered to be adaptive.","PeriodicalId":53445,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Linguistik","volume":"2021 1","pages":"31 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Linguistik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zfal-2021-2052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This paper focuses on the definition, operationalization and empirical investigation of adaptivity in the context of language training. We discuss a study that aimed at answering the question whether kindergarten teachers adapt their language to the specific needs of children with German as a second language in language training situations. Specifically, we investigated whether teachers use subordinate clauses and specific language training techniques to present or elicit subordinate clauses more frequently when working with children who had not yet acquired subordinate clauses than teachers supporting children who already had. Fifteen teachers were videotaped during language support sessions. Ten children who were supported during these sessions had not yet acquired subordinate clauses (n = 18), the other five teachers supported children with no additional needs in this area (n = 7). The teachers’ language was analysed both quantitatively and qualitatively in terms of the frequency of use of different subordinate clauses (e. g. position of the verb, subordinating conjunctions, different types of clauses) and the use of language support techniques (e. g. corrective feedback, expansions, questions) that aimed at presenting or eliciting subordinate clauses. A comparison of the two groups showed no differences in the teachers’ language depending on whether they supported children with or without additional needs regarding subordinate clauses. Therefore, the teachers’ language cannot be considered to be adaptive.
德语作为第二语言的儿童的语言推广适应性如何?
摘要本文主要研究语言训练中适应性的定义、操作和实证研究。我们讨论了一项研究,旨在回答幼儿园教师在语言培训情况下是否使他们的语言适应德语作为第二语言的儿童的特定需求。具体来说,我们调查了教师在与尚未获得从句的儿童合作时,是否比支持已经获得从句的孩子的教师更频繁地使用从句和特定的语言训练技巧来呈现或引出从句。15名教师在语言支持会议期间被录像。在这些课程中得到支持的10名儿童尚未获得附属条款(n=18),其他5名教师支持在这一领域没有额外需求的儿童(n=7)。从不同从句的使用频率(如动词的位置、从属连词、不同类型的从句)和旨在呈现或引出从句的语言支持技术(如纠正反馈、扩展、问题)的使用两个方面对教师的语言进行了定量和定性分析。两组的比较显示,教师的语言没有差异,这取决于他们是否支持有附加从句需求的儿童。因此,教师的语言不能被认为是适应性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Linguistik
Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Linguistik Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: The Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik (ZfAL) is the official publication of the Gesellschaft für Angewandte Linguistik (GAL) [Society for Applied Linguistics]. It is one of the most important German journals in this field and appears biannually. ZfAL seeks to represent the entire field of applied linguistics and to give impulses for the academic discourse in all of its subdisciplines (e.g. phonetics and speech science, lexicography, grammar and grammar theory, text linguistics and stylistics, discourse studies, media communication, specialized communication, sociolinguistics, language contact and multilingualism, intercultural communication and multilingual discourses, translation/interpretation studies, language didactics, media didactics and media competence, computer linguistics, among others). The emphasis of applied linguistics is on the transfer of linguistic methods and insights to the professional practice of those whose work concerns language, language use and communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信