Evaluating Poland’s Family 500+ Child Support Programme

IF 0.2 Q4 ECONOMICS
Filip Premik
{"title":"Evaluating Poland’s Family 500+ Child Support Programme","authors":"Filip Premik","doi":"10.33119/gn/149193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I investigate the immediate effects of the introduction of a large-scale child benefit programme on the labour supply of household members in Poland. Due to non-ran-dom eligibility and the universal character of the programme, standard evaluation estimators may be inconsistent. In order to address this issue, I propose an approach that combines difference-in-difference (DID) propensity score based methods with the covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) approach developed by Imai and Ratkovic [ 2014 ]. The DID estimators exploit the time dimension to uncover the causal effect of interest. The CBPS method is expected to significantly reduce the bias resulting from systematic differences between treated and untreated subpopulations. I also account for potential heterogeneity among households by focus-ing on comparisons between locally defined subpopulations","PeriodicalId":40977,"journal":{"name":"Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33119/gn/149193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

I investigate the immediate effects of the introduction of a large-scale child benefit programme on the labour supply of household members in Poland. Due to non-ran-dom eligibility and the universal character of the programme, standard evaluation estimators may be inconsistent. In order to address this issue, I propose an approach that combines difference-in-difference (DID) propensity score based methods with the covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) approach developed by Imai and Ratkovic [ 2014 ]. The DID estimators exploit the time dimension to uncover the causal effect of interest. The CBPS method is expected to significantly reduce the bias resulting from systematic differences between treated and untreated subpopulations. I also account for potential heterogeneity among households by focus-ing on comparisons between locally defined subpopulations
评估波兰的家庭500+儿童支持方案
我调查了在波兰实行大规模儿童福利方案对家庭成员劳动力供应的直接影响。由于资格的非随机性和项目的普遍性,标准评估估计值可能不一致。为了解决这个问题,我提出了一种方法,将基于差分中的差分(DID)倾向得分的方法与Imai和Ratkovic[2014]开发的协变量平衡倾向得分(CBPS)方法相结合。DID估计器利用时间维度来揭示兴趣的因果效应。CBPS方法有望显著减少因治疗和未治疗亚群之间的系统差异而产生的偏倚。我还通过关注本地定义的亚群体之间的比较来解释家庭之间潜在的异质性
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信