Spatial analysis of cultural ecosystem services using data from social media: A guide to model selection for research and practice

IF 1.8 Q3 ECOLOGY
Andrew Neill, C. O’Donoghue, J. Stout
{"title":"Spatial analysis of cultural ecosystem services using data from social media: A guide to model selection for research and practice","authors":"Andrew Neill, C. O’Donoghue, J. Stout","doi":"10.3897/oneeco.8.e95685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experiences gained through in person (in-situ) interactions with ecosystems provide cultural ecosystem services. These services are difficult to assess because they are non-material, vary spatially and have strong perceptual characteristics. Data obtained from social media can provide spatially-explicit information regarding some in-situ cultural ecosystem services by serving as a proxy for visitation. These data can identify environmental characteristics (natural, human and built capital) correlated with visitation and, therefore, the types of places used for in-situ environmental interactions. A range of spatial models can be applied in this way that vary in complexity and can provide information for ecosystem service assessments. We deployed four models (global regression, local regression, maximum entropy and the InVEST recreation model) to the same case-study area, County Galway, Ireland, to compare spatial models. A total of 6,752 photo-user-days (PUD) (a visitation metric) were obtained from Flickr. Data describing natural, human and built capital were collected from national databases. Results showed a blend of capital types correlated with PUD suggesting that local context, including biophysical traits and accessibility, are relevant for in-situ cultural ecosystem service flows. Average trends included distance to the coast and elevation as negatively correlated with PUD, while the presence of major roads and recreational sites, population density and habitat diversity were positively correlated. Evidence of local relationships, especially town distance, were detected using geographic weighted regression. Predicted hotspots for visitation included urban areas in the east of the region and rural, coastal areas with major roads in the west. We conclude by presenting a guide for researchers and practitioners developing cultural ecosystem service spatial models using data from social media that considers data coverage, landscape heterogeneity, computational resources, statistical expertise and environmental context.","PeriodicalId":36908,"journal":{"name":"One Ecosystem","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"One Ecosystem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.8.e95685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Experiences gained through in person (in-situ) interactions with ecosystems provide cultural ecosystem services. These services are difficult to assess because they are non-material, vary spatially and have strong perceptual characteristics. Data obtained from social media can provide spatially-explicit information regarding some in-situ cultural ecosystem services by serving as a proxy for visitation. These data can identify environmental characteristics (natural, human and built capital) correlated with visitation and, therefore, the types of places used for in-situ environmental interactions. A range of spatial models can be applied in this way that vary in complexity and can provide information for ecosystem service assessments. We deployed four models (global regression, local regression, maximum entropy and the InVEST recreation model) to the same case-study area, County Galway, Ireland, to compare spatial models. A total of 6,752 photo-user-days (PUD) (a visitation metric) were obtained from Flickr. Data describing natural, human and built capital were collected from national databases. Results showed a blend of capital types correlated with PUD suggesting that local context, including biophysical traits and accessibility, are relevant for in-situ cultural ecosystem service flows. Average trends included distance to the coast and elevation as negatively correlated with PUD, while the presence of major roads and recreational sites, population density and habitat diversity were positively correlated. Evidence of local relationships, especially town distance, were detected using geographic weighted regression. Predicted hotspots for visitation included urban areas in the east of the region and rural, coastal areas with major roads in the west. We conclude by presenting a guide for researchers and practitioners developing cultural ecosystem service spatial models using data from social media that considers data coverage, landscape heterogeneity, computational resources, statistical expertise and environmental context.
利用社交媒体数据进行文化生态系统服务的空间分析:研究和实践模式选择指南
通过与生态系统的面对面(现场)互动获得的经验提供了文化生态系统服务。这些服务很难评估,因为它们是非物质的,在空间上各不相同,并且具有强烈的感知特征。从社交媒体获得的数据可以作为访问的代理,提供关于一些现场文化生态系统服务的空间明确信息。这些数据可以确定与参观相关的环境特征(自然、人力和建筑资本),从而确定用于现场环境互动的场所类型。以这种方式可以应用一系列复杂程度不同的空间模型,这些模型可以为生态系统服务评估提供信息。我们在爱尔兰戈尔韦郡的同一案例研究区域部署了四个模型(全局回归、局部回归、最大熵和InVEST娱乐模型),以比较空间模型。从Flickr上总共获得了6752个照片用户日(PUD)(访问量指标)。描述自然资本、人力资本和建设资本的数据是从国家数据库中收集的。结果显示,与PUD相关的资本类型的混合表明,当地环境,包括生物物理特征和可及性,与当地文化生态系统服务流相关。平均趋势包括到海岸的距离和海拔高度与PUD呈负相关,而主要道路和娱乐场所的存在、人口密度和栖息地多样性呈正相关。使用地理加权回归来检测当地关系的证据,特别是城镇距离。预计访问热点包括该地区东部的城市地区和西部有主要道路的农村、沿海地区。最后,我们为研究人员和从业者提供了一份使用社交媒体数据开发文化生态系统服务空间模型的指南,该模型考虑了数据覆盖率、景观异质性、计算资源、统计专业知识和环境背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
One Ecosystem
One Ecosystem Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信