Effective Design, Development, and Evaluation of Video Tutorials for Electronic Medical Record Training

ACI open Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0040-1708036
G. Randhawa, A. Shachak, K. Courtney, A. Kushniruk
{"title":"Effective Design, Development, and Evaluation of Video Tutorials for Electronic Medical Record Training","authors":"G. Randhawa, A. Shachak, K. Courtney, A. Kushniruk","doi":"10.1055/s-0040-1708036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Electronic medical record (EMR) use by primary care physicians (PCP) in the United States and Canada is suboptimal, especially for supporting chronic diseases like diabetes. PCPs need postimplementation training to achieve value-adding EMR use. Video tutorials demonstrate how to accomplish tasks using software. However, there is a dearth of research on the use of video tutorials for EMR training. Objective The purpose of the study was to design, develop, and evaluate video tutorials for training PCPs in using EMR advanced features for diabetes care. This study addressed three research questions related to PCP's views of video tutorials as an EMR training method/approach, barriers, and facilitators to applying the EMR video tutorials to PCPs' practice, and how the design of EMR video tutorials can be improved. Methods The overall research study employed a QUAN (qual) mixed methods approach with an embedded design. This article focuses on the qualitative phase of the mixed methods study. A series of four theory-informed and evidence-based video tutorials for diabetes care was developed with a physician champion. Qualitative data were collected at four time points: 1 month before (O1), immediately before (O2), 3 months after (O3), and 6 months (O4) after the intervention. Semistructured interviews with participants were held at O3 and O4. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results In total, 14 PCPs from the overall study participated in interviews (78%). The thematic analysis of the qualitative data revealed seven themes, which fall into two main categories: (1) design and development of EMR video tutorials, and (2) adoption and use of EMR video tutorials. Conclusion PCPs liked the EMR video tutorials for diabetes care, and would like more EMR video tutorials on various topics and EMR use levels. The study offers a roadmap for health informatics professionals everywhere to develop EMR training videos that meet evidence-based design criteria. It also help to identify opportunities to improve the design, delivery, and adoption of EMR video tutorials for future training interventions.","PeriodicalId":72041,"journal":{"name":"ACI open","volume":"04 1","pages":"e69 - e82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/s-0040-1708036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACI open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1708036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Electronic medical record (EMR) use by primary care physicians (PCP) in the United States and Canada is suboptimal, especially for supporting chronic diseases like diabetes. PCPs need postimplementation training to achieve value-adding EMR use. Video tutorials demonstrate how to accomplish tasks using software. However, there is a dearth of research on the use of video tutorials for EMR training. Objective The purpose of the study was to design, develop, and evaluate video tutorials for training PCPs in using EMR advanced features for diabetes care. This study addressed three research questions related to PCP's views of video tutorials as an EMR training method/approach, barriers, and facilitators to applying the EMR video tutorials to PCPs' practice, and how the design of EMR video tutorials can be improved. Methods The overall research study employed a QUAN (qual) mixed methods approach with an embedded design. This article focuses on the qualitative phase of the mixed methods study. A series of four theory-informed and evidence-based video tutorials for diabetes care was developed with a physician champion. Qualitative data were collected at four time points: 1 month before (O1), immediately before (O2), 3 months after (O3), and 6 months (O4) after the intervention. Semistructured interviews with participants were held at O3 and O4. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results In total, 14 PCPs from the overall study participated in interviews (78%). The thematic analysis of the qualitative data revealed seven themes, which fall into two main categories: (1) design and development of EMR video tutorials, and (2) adoption and use of EMR video tutorials. Conclusion PCPs liked the EMR video tutorials for diabetes care, and would like more EMR video tutorials on various topics and EMR use levels. The study offers a roadmap for health informatics professionals everywhere to develop EMR training videos that meet evidence-based design criteria. It also help to identify opportunities to improve the design, delivery, and adoption of EMR video tutorials for future training interventions.
电子病历培训视频教程的有效设计、开发和评估
背景:在美国和加拿大,初级保健医生(PCP)使用电子病历(EMR)的情况并不理想,尤其是在支持糖尿病等慢性疾病时。pcp需要实施后培训,以实现增值电子病历的使用。视频教程演示如何使用软件完成任务。然而,关于使用视频教程进行电子病历培训的研究却很缺乏。目的:设计、开发和评估视频教程,用于培训pcp使用电子病历高级功能进行糖尿病护理。本研究解决了三个研究问题,这些问题与PCP将视频教程视为EMR培训方法/途径、将EMR视频教程应用于PCP实践的障碍和促进因素以及如何改进EMR视频教程的设计有关。方法采用全等量混合方法,采用嵌入式设计。本文主要对定性阶段的混合方法进行研究。一套四套以理论为基础、以证据为基础的糖尿病护理视频教程是与一位医生合作制作的。在干预前1个月(O1)、干预前1个月(O2)、干预后3个月(O3)、干预后6个月(O4)四个时间点采集定性数据。在O3和O4对参与者进行了半结构化访谈。定性数据采用专题分析进行分析。结果共有14名pcp参与了访谈(78%)。定性数据的专题分析揭示了七个主题,主要分为两大类:(1)EMR视频教程的设计与开发;(2)EMR视频教程的采用与使用。结论pcp喜欢EMR糖尿病护理视频教程,并希望更多关于不同主题和EMR使用水平的EMR视频教程。这项研究为各地的卫生信息学专业人员开发符合循证设计标准的电子病历培训视频提供了路线图。它还有助于确定改进EMR视频教程的设计、交付和采用的机会,以用于未来的培训干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书