Structural injustice and the significance of the past

IF 1.3 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE

European Journal of Political Theory Pub Date : 2021-10-09 DOI:10.1177/14748851211045906

Seungeun Song

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alasia Nuti's Injustice and the Reproduction of History lays out a brilliant structural injustice approach that incorporates the normative significance of the past. This article will introduce Nuti's framework and critically reflect on its original contributions. First, I will explain how Nuti's structural injustice approach successfully incorporates backward-looking dimensions. Second, I will provide a detailed analysis of Nuti's conception of sexism as a specific type of structural injustice. Finally, I will critically engage with Nuti's idea of structural remedy and explore how her analysis could be extended.

查看原文本刊更多论文

结构性的不公正和过去的重要性

阿拉西亚·努蒂的《不公正与历史的再现》阐述了一种巧妙的结构性不公正方法，它融合了过去的规范意义。本文将介绍Nuti的框架，并批判性地反思其最初的贡献。首先，我将解释Nuti的结构性不公正方法是如何成功地融入了向后看的维度的。其次，我将详细分析努蒂将性别歧视视为一种特定类型的结构性不公正的概念。最后，我将批判性地参与Nuti的结构补救思想，并探讨如何扩展她的分析。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Journal of Political Theory POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

9.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Journal of Political Theory provides a high profile research forum. Broad in scope and international in readership, the Journal is named after its geographical location, but is committed to advancing original debates in political theory in the widest possible sense--geographical, historical, and ideological. The Journal publishes contributions in analytic political philosophy, political theory, comparative political thought, and the history of ideas of any tradition. Work that challenges orthodoxies and disrupts entrenched debates is particularly encouraged. All research articles are subject to triple-blind peer-review by internationally renowned scholars in order to ensure the highest standards of quality and impartiality.