Assessing Nasal Soft-Tissue Envelope Thickness for Rhinoplasty: Normative Data and a Predictive Algorithm.

Q1 Medicine
Jacob K. Dey, Chelsey A Recker, M. D. Olson, A. Bowen, A. Panda, Petro M. Kostandy, J. Lane, G. Hamilton
{"title":"Assessing Nasal Soft-Tissue Envelope Thickness for Rhinoplasty: Normative Data and a Predictive Algorithm.","authors":"Jacob K. Dey, Chelsey A Recker, M. D. Olson, A. Bowen, A. Panda, Petro M. Kostandy, J. Lane, G. Hamilton","doi":"10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\nPreoperative assessment of nasal soft-tissue envelope (STE) thickness is an important component of rhinoplasty that presently lacks validated tools.\n\n\nObjective\nTo measure and assess the distribution of nasal STE thickness in a large patient population and to determine if facial plastic surgery clinicians can predict nasal STE thickness based on visual examination of the nose.\n\n\nDesign, Setting, and Participants\nThis retrospective review and prospective assessment of 190 adult patients by 4 expert raters was conducted at an academic tertiary referral center. The patients had high-resolution maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) scans and standardized facial photographs on file and did not have a history of nasal fracture, septal perforation, rhinoplasty, or other surgery or medical conditions altering nasal form. Data were analyzed in March 2019.\n\n\nMain Outcomes and Measures\nMeasure nasal STE thickness at defined anatomic subsites using high-resolution CT scans. Measure expert-predicted nasal STE thickness based on visual examination of the nose using a scale from 0 (thinnest) to 100 (thickest).\n\n\nResults\nOf the 190 patients, 78 were women and the mean (SD) age was 45 (17) years. The nasal STE was thickest at the sellion (mean [SD]) (6.7 [1.7] mm), thinnest at the rhinion (2.1 [0.7] mm), thickened over the supratip (4.8 [1.0] mm) and nasal tip (3.1 [0.6] mm), and thinned over the columella (2.6 [0.4] mm). In the study population, nasal STE thickness followed a nearly normal distribution for each measured subsite, with the majority of patients in a medium thickness range. Comparison of predicted and actual nasal STE thickness showed that experts could accurately predict nasal STE thickness, with the highest accuracy at the nasal tip (r, 0.73; prediction accuracy, 91%); . A strong positive correlation was noted among the experts' STE estimates (r, 0.83-0.89), suggesting a high level of agreement between individual raters.\n\n\nConclusions and Relevance\nThere is variable thickness of the nasal STE, which influences the external nasal contour and rhinoplasty outcomes. With visual analysis of the nose, experts can agree on and predict nasal STE thickness, with the highest accuracy at the nasal tip. These data can aid in preoperative planning for rhinoplasty, allowing implementation of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative strategies to optimize the nasal STE, which may ultimately improve patient outcomes and satisfaction.\n\n\nLevel of Evidence\nN/A.","PeriodicalId":14538,"journal":{"name":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0715","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA facial plastic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2019.0715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Importance Preoperative assessment of nasal soft-tissue envelope (STE) thickness is an important component of rhinoplasty that presently lacks validated tools. Objective To measure and assess the distribution of nasal STE thickness in a large patient population and to determine if facial plastic surgery clinicians can predict nasal STE thickness based on visual examination of the nose. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective review and prospective assessment of 190 adult patients by 4 expert raters was conducted at an academic tertiary referral center. The patients had high-resolution maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) scans and standardized facial photographs on file and did not have a history of nasal fracture, septal perforation, rhinoplasty, or other surgery or medical conditions altering nasal form. Data were analyzed in March 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures Measure nasal STE thickness at defined anatomic subsites using high-resolution CT scans. Measure expert-predicted nasal STE thickness based on visual examination of the nose using a scale from 0 (thinnest) to 100 (thickest). Results Of the 190 patients, 78 were women and the mean (SD) age was 45 (17) years. The nasal STE was thickest at the sellion (mean [SD]) (6.7 [1.7] mm), thinnest at the rhinion (2.1 [0.7] mm), thickened over the supratip (4.8 [1.0] mm) and nasal tip (3.1 [0.6] mm), and thinned over the columella (2.6 [0.4] mm). In the study population, nasal STE thickness followed a nearly normal distribution for each measured subsite, with the majority of patients in a medium thickness range. Comparison of predicted and actual nasal STE thickness showed that experts could accurately predict nasal STE thickness, with the highest accuracy at the nasal tip (r, 0.73; prediction accuracy, 91%); . A strong positive correlation was noted among the experts' STE estimates (r, 0.83-0.89), suggesting a high level of agreement between individual raters. Conclusions and Relevance There is variable thickness of the nasal STE, which influences the external nasal contour and rhinoplasty outcomes. With visual analysis of the nose, experts can agree on and predict nasal STE thickness, with the highest accuracy at the nasal tip. These data can aid in preoperative planning for rhinoplasty, allowing implementation of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative strategies to optimize the nasal STE, which may ultimately improve patient outcomes and satisfaction. Level of Evidence N/A.
鼻整形术中评估鼻软组织包膜厚度:标准数据和预测算法。
鼻软组织包膜(STE)厚度的术前评估是鼻整形术的一个重要组成部分,目前缺乏有效的工具。目的测量和评估大量患者的鼻STE厚度分布,并确定面部整形临床医生是否可以根据鼻子的视觉检查来预测鼻STE厚度。设计、环境和参与者本研究在一家学术三级转诊中心由4位专家对190名成年患者进行回顾性评价和前瞻性评估。这些患者进行了高分辨率颌面计算机断层扫描(CT)和标准化的面部照片存档,并且没有鼻骨折、鼻中隔穿孔、鼻成形术或其他改变鼻形态的手术或医疗条件的病史。数据分析于2019年3月进行。主要结果和测量方法使用高分辨率CT扫描测量指定解剖亚位点的鼻STE厚度。测量专家预测的鼻STE厚度,基于鼻子的视觉检查,使用从0(最薄)到100(最厚)的刻度。结果190例患者中,女性78例,平均(SD)年龄45(17)岁。鼻STE在鞍部最厚(平均[SD]) (6.7 [1.7] mm),鼻梁最薄(2.1 [0.7]mm),鼻尖上增厚(4.8 [1.0]mm),鼻尖增厚(3.1 [0.6]mm),鼻梁增薄(2.6 [0.4]mm)。在研究人群中,每个测量亚位点的鼻STE厚度几乎服从正态分布,大多数患者在中等厚度范围内。预测与实际鼻部STE厚度的比较表明,专家能够准确预测鼻部STE厚度,鼻尖处准确率最高(r, 0.73;预测准确率为91%);. 专家的STE估计值之间存在很强的正相关(r, 0.83-0.89),表明评分者之间的一致性很高。结论与意义鼻STE厚度变化,影响鼻外轮廓和鼻整形效果。通过对鼻子的视觉分析,专家可以就鼻尖处的STE厚度达成一致并进行预测,准确度最高。这些数据有助于鼻整形术前规划,允许实施术前、术中和术后策略来优化鼻STE,最终可能提高患者的预后和满意度。证据水平
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic Medicine (Formerly, JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery) is a multispecialty journal with a key mission to provide physicians and providers with the most accurate and innovative information in the discipline of facial plastic (reconstructive and cosmetic) interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信