Evolución del pensamiento de Andrés Bello sobre el carácter gratuito u oneroso del contrato de mandato

Q3 Arts and Humanities
Alexis Mondaca Miranda
{"title":"Evolución del pensamiento de Andrés Bello sobre el carácter gratuito u oneroso del contrato de mandato","authors":"Alexis Mondaca Miranda","doi":"10.4067/s0716-54552019000100317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen En el presente articulo se estudia la evolucion del contrato de mandato en el pensamiento de Andres Bello, con respecto a la gratuidad u onerosidad del mismo. Para lograr los propositos de esta investigacion, es necesario analizar el pensamiento de Andres Bello concretado en sus “Instituciones de derecho romano” y en sus “Esplicaciones de derecho romano”. En dichas obras, en forma fiel a la tradicion romanista, se indico que el mandato por esencia era gratuito. Tambien se estudia el derecho civil frances y especialmente los diversos proyectos de Codigo Civil de Chile, con el objetivo de determinar el momento en que se admitio su onerosidad. EnglishAbstract In this article we will study the evolution of the contract of mandate in relation to its gratuitousness or valuable consideration in the thought of Andres Bello. To attain the purposes of this investigation, an analysis of the thought of Andres Bello, concretely his viewpoints on the matter as portrayed on his “Instituciones de derecho romano” and “Esplicaciones de derecho romano” is proven necessary. In said works, faithful to the civil law tradition, he stated that the contract of mandate was, in essence, gratuitous. The French Civil Law and especially the different drafts of Chilean Civil Code are studied, so as to determine the exact moment in which its valuable consideration is admitted.","PeriodicalId":35307,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-54552019000100317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

espanolResumen En el presente articulo se estudia la evolucion del contrato de mandato en el pensamiento de Andres Bello, con respecto a la gratuidad u onerosidad del mismo. Para lograr los propositos de esta investigacion, es necesario analizar el pensamiento de Andres Bello concretado en sus “Instituciones de derecho romano” y en sus “Esplicaciones de derecho romano”. En dichas obras, en forma fiel a la tradicion romanista, se indico que el mandato por esencia era gratuito. Tambien se estudia el derecho civil frances y especialmente los diversos proyectos de Codigo Civil de Chile, con el objetivo de determinar el momento en que se admitio su onerosidad. EnglishAbstract In this article we will study the evolution of the contract of mandate in relation to its gratuitousness or valuable consideration in the thought of Andres Bello. To attain the purposes of this investigation, an analysis of the thought of Andres Bello, concretely his viewpoints on the matter as portrayed on his “Instituciones de derecho romano” and “Esplicaciones de derecho romano” is proven necessary. In said works, faithful to the civil law tradition, he stated that the contract of mandate was, in essence, gratuitous. The French Civil Law and especially the different drafts of Chilean Civil Code are studied, so as to determine the exact moment in which its valuable consideration is admitted.
安德烈斯·贝洛关于委托合同自由或繁重性质的思想演变
在这一过程中,我们发现了一种方法,通过这种方法,一个人可以在他或她的职业生涯中,在他或她的职业生涯中,在他或她的职业生涯中,在他或她的职业生涯中,在他或她的职业生涯中,在他或她的职业生涯中,在他或她的职业生涯中。本文的目的是分析安德烈斯·贝罗在他的《罗马法制度》和《罗马法的应用》中所体现的思想。在这些作品中,忠于罗马传统的方式表明,授权本质上是免费的。它还研究了法国民法,特别是智利民法典的各种草案,目的是确定承认它们的时间。在本文中,我们将研究与安德烈斯·贝罗思想中无偿或有价值的考虑有关的授权合同的演变。为达到本次调查的目的,有必要对安德烈斯·贝罗的思想进行分析,具体阐述他在“罗马法机构”和“罗马法申请”中所描述的问题上的观点。在他的作品中,忠实于民法传统,他说,合同的授权本质上是免费的。对法国民法,特别是智利民法的不同草案进行了研究,以便确定接受其宝贵考虑的确切时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos
Revista de Estudios Historico-Juridicos Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The aim of Revista de Estudios Histórico-Jurídicos (abbreviation REHJ, for Historical-Legal Studies Journal) is to spread original and unpublished articles regarding dogmatic, legislative and institutional history in the fields of Roman Law and Legal History, especially in the European and Ibero-American Romanistic tradition; and of History of Western legal and political thought; even if these are lectures given at scientific congresses. It also accepts revisions regarding the status of an issue and broad bibliographic revisions, as long as they are of a critical nature. The Journal does not publish works of a purely philosophical, theoretical, political or sociological content; neither publishes works of a mere outreach nature, whether they consist in non-reprocessed lectures or conferences as articles, nor if they offer the assay form ("reflections", "remarks", "considerations", "note-taking", "notes" etc.). General Coverage on the Following Topics: Roman law, History of (public and private) Law, History of canon law, History of European law, Indian Law (History of the legal system applied in the Americas during the Spanish colonisation), History of the Ibero-American national laws, History of Chilean law, History of the legal dogmas, History of the legal thought, History of the political thought, History of institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信