Benefits of Radiotherapy with Indigenous Tools Aiding Deep Inspiration Breath Holding Technique Compared to Free Breathing Technique among Breast Cancer Patients in Bangladesh

Md Arifur Rahman, R. Balakrishnan, Md. Salim Reza, Q. Chowdhury
{"title":"Benefits of Radiotherapy with Indigenous Tools Aiding Deep Inspiration Breath Holding Technique Compared to Free Breathing Technique among Breast Cancer Patients in Bangladesh","authors":"Md Arifur Rahman, R. Balakrishnan, Md. Salim Reza, Q. Chowdhury","doi":"10.4236/abcr.2021.103006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Post-operative breast radiotherapy is used to \nreduce recurrence. The aim of this \nstudy was to investigate the outcomes of Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold (DIBH) technique with indigenous breath holding indicator scale in 3DCRT for \nbreast cancer radiotherapy over Free Breathing (FB) technique. Methods: An observational study conducted at the Department of Radiation \nOncology at National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, Dhaka and Square Hospital Limited, \nDhaka, Bangladesh from June 2015 to May 2016. A total of 60 confirmed breast cancer patients who underwent \nadjuvant radiotherapy were included. An indigenous reproducible plastic tool (Perspex) \nwas used as breath holding indicator \nscale with DIBH technique in 3DCRT. Paired \nsample t-test was used to compare with FB technique. Results: The mean age of patients was 47.32 (SD ± 8.33) years. In FB technique, Mean Heart Dose \n(MHD) was 413.27 cGy while in DIBH technique, it was 254.91 cGy (P and V30 were 5.5%, 4.37% in FB and 3.13%, 2.36% in DIBH \nrespectively. In FB technique LADMD, LAD 0.2 cm3, ILMD and ILV20 were 1698.17 cGy, 2852.53 cGy, 1155.31 \ncGy and 28.62% while in DIBH technique, it was reduced to 1164.01 cGy, \n2132.24 cGy, 1007.98 cGy and 23.39% respectively. Similarly, the lung-CLMD and \nbreast-CLMD were reduced \nfrom 38.37 cGy and 55.18 cGy to 24.64 cGy and 33.82 cGy respectively (P Conclusion: The use \nof indigenous breath holding indicator \nscale with DIBH had better outcomes on breast cancer radiotherapy.","PeriodicalId":67095,"journal":{"name":"乳腺癌(英文)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"乳腺癌(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/abcr.2021.103006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Post-operative breast radiotherapy is used to reduce recurrence. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold (DIBH) technique with indigenous breath holding indicator scale in 3DCRT for breast cancer radiotherapy over Free Breathing (FB) technique. Methods: An observational study conducted at the Department of Radiation Oncology at National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital, Dhaka and Square Hospital Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh from June 2015 to May 2016. A total of 60 confirmed breast cancer patients who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy were included. An indigenous reproducible plastic tool (Perspex) was used as breath holding indicator scale with DIBH technique in 3DCRT. Paired sample t-test was used to compare with FB technique. Results: The mean age of patients was 47.32 (SD ± 8.33) years. In FB technique, Mean Heart Dose (MHD) was 413.27 cGy while in DIBH technique, it was 254.91 cGy (P and V30 were 5.5%, 4.37% in FB and 3.13%, 2.36% in DIBH respectively. In FB technique LADMD, LAD 0.2 cm3, ILMD and ILV20 were 1698.17 cGy, 2852.53 cGy, 1155.31 cGy and 28.62% while in DIBH technique, it was reduced to 1164.01 cGy, 2132.24 cGy, 1007.98 cGy and 23.39% respectively. Similarly, the lung-CLMD and breast-CLMD were reduced from 38.37 cGy and 55.18 cGy to 24.64 cGy and 33.82 cGy respectively (P Conclusion: The use of indigenous breath holding indicator scale with DIBH had better outcomes on breast cancer radiotherapy.
在孟加拉国的乳腺癌患者中,与自由呼吸技术相比,使用本土工具辅助深度吸气屏气技术进行放疗的益处
背景:术后乳腺放射治疗用于减少复发。本研究的目的是研究在3DCRT中,与自由呼吸(FB)技术相比,采用自主屏气指示量表的深度吸气屏气(DIBH)技术治疗癌症放疗的结果。方法:2015年6月至2016年5月,在孟加拉国达卡癌症国家研究所和医院放射肿瘤科和Square医院有限公司进行的一项观察性研究。共有60名接受辅助放疗的癌症确诊患者被纳入。在3DCRT中,使用国产可重复使用的塑料工具(有机玻璃)作为屏气指示量表。配对样本t检验用于与FB技术进行比较。结果:患者平均年龄为47.32(SD±8.33)岁。FB技术的平均心脏剂量(MHD)为413.27cGy,为254.91 cGy(FB和DIBH的P和V30分别为5.5%、4.37%和3.13%、2.36%。在FB技术中,LADMD 0.2 cm3、ILMD和ILV20分别为1698.17 cGy、2852.53 cGy,1155.31 cGy和28.62%,而在DIBH技术中,其分别降至1164.01 cGy、2132.24 cGy结论:国产屏气指示量表配合DIBH治疗癌症放疗效果较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
92
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信