Market Capitalized Scale and Corporate Capital Structure — Evidence from CSI300’s Listed Firms

IF 2 0 ECONOMICS
Huu Manh Nguyen, Wing-Keung Wong, Thi Huong Giang Vuong
{"title":"Market Capitalized Scale and Corporate Capital Structure — Evidence from CSI300’s Listed Firms","authors":"Huu Manh Nguyen, Wing-Keung Wong, Thi Huong Giang Vuong","doi":"10.1142/s2010495223500021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The firm’s market capitalization is an ideal proxy of the size of listed firms. Hence, this paper uses the firm’s market capitalization to capture the firm size instead of using other prior proxies to investigate the relationship between the market capitalized scale and corporate capital structure by employing the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) method to conduct analysis based on a sample of the 300 largest listed firms in China from 2010 to 2017. The CSI300 list consists of two subsample (CSI100 and CSI200), divided upon the firm’s market capitalized scales to represent both large-cap and small-cap firms. Our paper contributes to the literature on corporate finance by obtaining some new empirical results to assess the effect of market capitalized scale on corporate capital structure. We find that the market capitalized size has a significantly negative association with corporate leverage. We also find that both the Trade-Off Theory (TOT) and Pecking-Order Theory (POT) can partially explain the capital structure of the listed firms of the CSI300 Index such that the negative relationship between the market capitalized scales and corporate leverage is firmly identified in small-cap firms. Third, we observe that the greater validity of the POT’s predictions is enhanced in small-cap firms such that the greater inverse impact of profitability and the more significant positive effect of growth opportunities on corporate leverage are clearly shown in small-cap firms. Inversely, the more significant adverse effects of non-debt tax shields on corporate leverage are found in large-cap firms and there is no difference in the impact of tangible assets on debt ratios between CSI100’s listed companies and CSI200’s listed enterprises. Academics and practitioners could use our findings to draw better implications while policymakers could use our results to obtain better policies to improve the banking system with small listed companies.","PeriodicalId":43570,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Financial Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Financial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010495223500021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The firm’s market capitalization is an ideal proxy of the size of listed firms. Hence, this paper uses the firm’s market capitalization to capture the firm size instead of using other prior proxies to investigate the relationship between the market capitalized scale and corporate capital structure by employing the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) method to conduct analysis based on a sample of the 300 largest listed firms in China from 2010 to 2017. The CSI300 list consists of two subsample (CSI100 and CSI200), divided upon the firm’s market capitalized scales to represent both large-cap and small-cap firms. Our paper contributes to the literature on corporate finance by obtaining some new empirical results to assess the effect of market capitalized scale on corporate capital structure. We find that the market capitalized size has a significantly negative association with corporate leverage. We also find that both the Trade-Off Theory (TOT) and Pecking-Order Theory (POT) can partially explain the capital structure of the listed firms of the CSI300 Index such that the negative relationship between the market capitalized scales and corporate leverage is firmly identified in small-cap firms. Third, we observe that the greater validity of the POT’s predictions is enhanced in small-cap firms such that the greater inverse impact of profitability and the more significant positive effect of growth opportunities on corporate leverage are clearly shown in small-cap firms. Inversely, the more significant adverse effects of non-debt tax shields on corporate leverage are found in large-cap firms and there is no difference in the impact of tangible assets on debt ratios between CSI100’s listed companies and CSI200’s listed enterprises. Academics and practitioners could use our findings to draw better implications while policymakers could use our results to obtain better policies to improve the banking system with small listed companies.
市值规模与企业资本结构——来自沪深300指数上市公司的证据
公司的市值是衡量上市公司规模的理想指标。因此,本文采用广义矩量法(GMM)对2010年至2017年中国300家最大上市公司的样本进行分析,利用企业的市值来捕捉企业规模,而不是使用其他先验指标来研究市场资本化规模与企业资本结构之间的关系。CSI300列表由两个子样本(CSI100和CSI200)组成,根据公司的市值规模划分,代表大盘股和小盘股公司。本文通过获得一些新的实证结果来评估市场资本化规模对公司资本结构的影响,为公司融资文献做出了贡献。我们发现,市场资本化规模与企业杠杆率呈显著负相关。我们还发现,权衡理论(TOT)和Pecking Order理论(POT)都可以部分解释CSI300指数上市公司的资本结构,因此市场资本化规模与公司杠杆率之间的负关系在小盘股公司中得到了明确的确定。第三,我们观察到,POT预测的更大有效性在小盘股公司中得到了增强,因此盈利能力的更大反向影响和增长机会对公司杠杆率的更显著正向影响在小盘公司中清楚地表现出来。相反,非债务税收保护对公司杠杆率的更显著不利影响出现在大盘股公司中,CSI100的上市公司和CSI200的上市公司之间有形资产对债务比率的影响没有差异。学术界和从业者可以利用我们的研究结果得出更好的启示,而政策制定者可以利用我们研究结果获得更好的政策,以改善小型上市公司的银行系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
55.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信