Impact of Great Recession on Library Use: Does a Negative Economy Impact Library Use?

IF 1.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
M. Mabe
{"title":"Impact of Great Recession on Library Use: Does a Negative Economy Impact Library Use?","authors":"M. Mabe","doi":"10.1080/01616846.2022.2128628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The librarian’s axiom which states that when the economy is failing, use of the public library increases, has existed since the late 19th century. Educator and library administrator Steven James is credited with naming this phenomenon as he attempted to extrapolate the relationship between library usage and economic conditions. James’ 1985 research found no correlation between library use and economic using data from the sixties to the mid-seventies. However, the American Library Association’s Library Research Center several years later found that material circulation had increased significantly in the late nineties, a time of noted economic strife, leaving the question of the impact of economic trends on library use unresolved. Numerous articles dealing with library usage, economic downturns, library funding, and patron needs seek to understand past trends while anticipating, and even predicting, trends of the modern public library. This axiom bears out anecdotally; yet it is technically unproven statistically. The defined period of the Great Recession provides an opportunity to address this belief by using existing public library usage statistics. For this article, statistics used will be two years before, during, and two years after the Great Recession (2006–2011). Taking the annual data from public libraries which is reported to the state library agencies and then compiled nationally by the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) Public Library Service (PLS), Library Journal created the LJ Index of Public Library Service and Star library rating system. The LJ Index scores consist of the following four per capita service output statistics: library visits, circulation, program attendance, and public internet use. Specifically, library visits and circulation statistics are utilized to determine if, during this time of documented economic strife, library usage increased as per the librarian’s axiom.","PeriodicalId":45177,"journal":{"name":"Public Library Quarterly","volume":"42 1","pages":"515 - 533"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Library Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616846.2022.2128628","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The librarian’s axiom which states that when the economy is failing, use of the public library increases, has existed since the late 19th century. Educator and library administrator Steven James is credited with naming this phenomenon as he attempted to extrapolate the relationship between library usage and economic conditions. James’ 1985 research found no correlation between library use and economic using data from the sixties to the mid-seventies. However, the American Library Association’s Library Research Center several years later found that material circulation had increased significantly in the late nineties, a time of noted economic strife, leaving the question of the impact of economic trends on library use unresolved. Numerous articles dealing with library usage, economic downturns, library funding, and patron needs seek to understand past trends while anticipating, and even predicting, trends of the modern public library. This axiom bears out anecdotally; yet it is technically unproven statistically. The defined period of the Great Recession provides an opportunity to address this belief by using existing public library usage statistics. For this article, statistics used will be two years before, during, and two years after the Great Recession (2006–2011). Taking the annual data from public libraries which is reported to the state library agencies and then compiled nationally by the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) Public Library Service (PLS), Library Journal created the LJ Index of Public Library Service and Star library rating system. The LJ Index scores consist of the following four per capita service output statistics: library visits, circulation, program attendance, and public internet use. Specifically, library visits and circulation statistics are utilized to determine if, during this time of documented economic strife, library usage increased as per the librarian’s axiom.
大衰退对图书馆使用的影响:负经济会影响图书馆使用吗?
图书馆员的公理,即当经济衰退时,公共图书馆的使用就会增加,自19世纪末以来就一直存在。教育家兼图书馆管理员史蒂文·詹姆斯(Steven James)在试图推断图书馆使用与经济条件之间的关系时,对这一现象进行了命名。詹姆斯1985年的研究发现,从60年代到70年代中期,图书馆使用和经济使用数据之间没有相关性。然而,几年后,美国图书馆协会的图书馆研究中心发现,在90年代末,材料流通量显著增加,这是一个著名的经济冲突时期,经济趋势对图书馆使用的影响问题仍未解决。许多关于图书馆使用、经济衰退、图书馆资金和赞助人需求的文章试图了解过去的趋势,同时预测甚至预测现代公共图书馆的趋势。这一公理在轶事中得到了证实;然而,从统计数据来看,这在技术上是未经证实的。大衰退的特定时期提供了一个机会,通过使用现有的公共图书馆使用统计数据来解决这一问题。在这篇文章中,使用的统计数据将是大衰退前两年、期间和两年后(2006-2011)。《图书馆杂志》利用公共图书馆的年度数据,向国家图书馆机构报告,然后由博物馆和图书馆服务研究所(IMLS)公共图书馆服务(PLS)在全国范围内汇编,创建了公共图书馆服务LJ指数和星级图书馆评级系统。LJ指数由以下四项人均服务产出统计数据组成:图书馆访问量、发行量、节目出勤率和公共互联网使用。具体而言,利用图书馆访问量和发行量统计数据来确定在这段有记录的经济冲突时期,图书馆的使用量是否按照图书馆员的公理增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Library Quarterly
Public Library Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Public Libraries Quarterly is addressed to leaders-directors, managers, staff, trustees, and friends-who believe that change is imperative if public libraries are to fulfill their service missions in the twenty-first century. In PLQ, directors and operating officers tell how they accomplished change. The journal examines: •best practices and models to improve service •management case studies-with results and failures •library mythologies that retard individual and institutional development •studies of how to plan results and accomplish desired outcomes •marketing and fund-raising tools that work •budget and financial analysis tools and tips
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信