Principal professionalism in the time of COVID-19

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Corrie Stone-Johnson, J. Weiner
{"title":"Principal professionalism in the time of COVID-19","authors":"Corrie Stone-Johnson, J. Weiner","doi":"10.1108/jpcc-05-2020-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn this paper, we describe the impact of COVID-19 on principals and their work. Drawing on prior research undertaken prior to the onset of the pandemic, we describe how principals were already grappling with difficult tensions associated with their expertise, autonomy, normative orientation and rewards that may have real implications for their work moving forward and how, in the current context of uncertainty and change we believe the issue of principal professionalism requires our collective attention and action.Design/methodology/approachOver the last year, we undertook a multistate qualitative study of 17 school leaders to explore how principals working in traditional public schools conceptualize the principal profession and their role within it. Briefly, we found that the principalship is an “emergent profession” characterized by shared but individually determined knowledge and skills; a normative orientation of service; confused notions of external expectations and rewards and ongoing tensions among all of these elements.FindingsProfessionalism may be a surprising lever for improving the capacity of school leadership. Through our research, we identified that little is known about professionalism as it relates to the unique work of school leaders, but that understanding more about it could lead to greater knowledge of how to encourage and retain them. In the current context of uncertainty, chaos and change, the pressure on leaders to stay in the role and to succeed has never been greater. Thus, it is critical that principals have the capacity to exert professionalism over their work and to have greater say in elements of it, recognizing that some decisions must be made at district, state and federal levels.Originality/valueWhile many studies investigate how teachers of various backgrounds and in different contexts think about teaching as a profession (e.g. Anderson and Cohen, 2015; Stone-Johnson, 2014b; Torres and Weiner, 2018; Hall and McGinty, 2015), we had difficulty identifying studies focused on principals and using frameworks of professionalism to understand how these activities reflect larger shifts in the profession itself. This is despite the changing nature of principals' work, which, like the work of teachers, has been and continues to be largely influenced by the increasing role of neoliberal principles and policies in education. The public nature of the work of school leadership and the potential to support students, families and the communities in which they live brings in sharp focus the necessity of greater understanding of it during the COVID-19 crisis.","PeriodicalId":44790,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jpcc-05-2020-0020","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professional Capital and Community","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpcc-05-2020-0020","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

PurposeIn this paper, we describe the impact of COVID-19 on principals and their work. Drawing on prior research undertaken prior to the onset of the pandemic, we describe how principals were already grappling with difficult tensions associated with their expertise, autonomy, normative orientation and rewards that may have real implications for their work moving forward and how, in the current context of uncertainty and change we believe the issue of principal professionalism requires our collective attention and action.Design/methodology/approachOver the last year, we undertook a multistate qualitative study of 17 school leaders to explore how principals working in traditional public schools conceptualize the principal profession and their role within it. Briefly, we found that the principalship is an “emergent profession” characterized by shared but individually determined knowledge and skills; a normative orientation of service; confused notions of external expectations and rewards and ongoing tensions among all of these elements.FindingsProfessionalism may be a surprising lever for improving the capacity of school leadership. Through our research, we identified that little is known about professionalism as it relates to the unique work of school leaders, but that understanding more about it could lead to greater knowledge of how to encourage and retain them. In the current context of uncertainty, chaos and change, the pressure on leaders to stay in the role and to succeed has never been greater. Thus, it is critical that principals have the capacity to exert professionalism over their work and to have greater say in elements of it, recognizing that some decisions must be made at district, state and federal levels.Originality/valueWhile many studies investigate how teachers of various backgrounds and in different contexts think about teaching as a profession (e.g. Anderson and Cohen, 2015; Stone-Johnson, 2014b; Torres and Weiner, 2018; Hall and McGinty, 2015), we had difficulty identifying studies focused on principals and using frameworks of professionalism to understand how these activities reflect larger shifts in the profession itself. This is despite the changing nature of principals' work, which, like the work of teachers, has been and continues to be largely influenced by the increasing role of neoliberal principles and policies in education. The public nature of the work of school leadership and the potential to support students, families and the communities in which they live brings in sharp focus the necessity of greater understanding of it during the COVID-19 crisis.
COVID-19时期的主要专业精神
目的在本文中,我们描述了新冠肺炎对校长及其工作的影响。根据疫情爆发前进行的先前研究,我们描述了校长们是如何应对与他们的专业知识、自主性、规范导向和奖励相关的困难紧张关系的,这些可能对他们的工作向前发展产生实际影响,以及,在当前充满不确定性和变化的背景下,我们认为主要专业精神问题需要我们的集体关注和行动。设计/方法论/方法在过去的一年里,我们对17名学校领导进行了一项多州定性研究,以探索在传统公立学校工作的校长如何概念化主要职业及其在其中的角色。简言之,我们发现主要职业是一种“新兴职业”,其特征是共享但个人决定的知识和技能;规范的服务导向;对外部期望和回报的混淆概念,以及所有这些因素之间持续存在的紧张关系。发现专业化可能是提高学校领导能力的一个令人惊讶的杠杆。通过我们的研究,我们发现,人们对专业精神知之甚少,因为它与学校领导的独特工作有关,但更多地了解专业精神可以让我们更好地了解如何鼓励和留住他们。在当前充满不确定性、混乱和变化的背景下,领导人继续担任这一角色并取得成功的压力从未如此之大。因此,至关重要的是,校长有能力在工作中发挥专业精神,并在工作中有更大的发言权,同时认识到一些决定必须在地区、州和联邦层面做出。原创性/价值尽管许多研究调查了不同背景和不同背景的教师如何将教学视为一种职业(例如Anderson和Cohen,2015;Stone Johnson,2014b;Torres和Weiner,2018;Hall和McGinty,2015),我们很难确定专注于校长的研究,也很难使用专业框架来理解这些活动如何反映专业本身的更大转变。尽管校长的工作性质发生了变化,但与教师的工作一样,校长的工作一直并将继续在很大程度上受到新自由主义原则和政策在教育中日益重要作用的影响。学校领导工作的公共性质以及支持学生、家庭和他们生活的社区的潜力,使人们更加关注在新冠肺炎危机期间加强对其理解的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Professional Capital and Community
Journal of Professional Capital and Community EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信