„Od powietrza, głodu i pomnika Kuny zachowaj nas Panie”. Antysemicki spór o pomnik Adama Mickiewicza dla Wilna

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Diana Wasilewska
{"title":"„Od powietrza, głodu i pomnika Kuny zachowaj nas Panie”. Antysemicki spór o pomnik Adama Mickiewicza dla Wilna","authors":"Diana Wasilewska","doi":"10.4467/24500100stj.22.005.16299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“From Air, Hunger, and the Monument by Kuna Protect Us, Lord”: The Antisemitic Dispute over the Adam Mickiewicz Monument for Vilnius\n\nAfter Poland regained independence in 1918, a considerable group of Polish Jews wanted to co-create Polish culture, which did not find approval in the eyes of nationalists, defenders of the purity of national culture. Writers and artists of Jewish origin, especially those assimilated, became the main target of attacks and victims of social ostracism. The story of the monument of Adam Mickiewicz proposed to the city of Vilnius by Henryk Kuna, a sculptor with Jewish roots, may serve as a case study, perfectly illustrating both the power of resentment among the broad masses of society at the time and the influence of journalists. Kuna’s project was the third (after Zbigniew Pronaszko’s avant-garde monument and Stanisław Szukalski’s symbolist one) project of a Mickiewicz monument for Vilnius, selected in a competition in 1932. Unlike the previous ones, it did not seem to be controversial either in terms of form (it represented modernized classicism) or symbolism (it showed the poet in a pilgrim’s cloak with a book in one hand, the other hand covering his eyes). Despite this, nationalist circles unleashed an antisemitic campaign, striking at both the artistic and iconographic value of the statue. A rich variety of rhetorical means, from wit to virulent mockery, prove that it was not aesthetic preferences that played a dominant role here, but Henryk Kuna’s background, which influenced the evaluation and interpretation of his work.","PeriodicalId":37335,"journal":{"name":"Studia Judaica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Judaica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/24500100stj.22.005.16299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“From Air, Hunger, and the Monument by Kuna Protect Us, Lord”: The Antisemitic Dispute over the Adam Mickiewicz Monument for Vilnius After Poland regained independence in 1918, a considerable group of Polish Jews wanted to co-create Polish culture, which did not find approval in the eyes of nationalists, defenders of the purity of national culture. Writers and artists of Jewish origin, especially those assimilated, became the main target of attacks and victims of social ostracism. The story of the monument of Adam Mickiewicz proposed to the city of Vilnius by Henryk Kuna, a sculptor with Jewish roots, may serve as a case study, perfectly illustrating both the power of resentment among the broad masses of society at the time and the influence of journalists. Kuna’s project was the third (after Zbigniew Pronaszko’s avant-garde monument and Stanisław Szukalski’s symbolist one) project of a Mickiewicz monument for Vilnius, selected in a competition in 1932. Unlike the previous ones, it did not seem to be controversial either in terms of form (it represented modernized classicism) or symbolism (it showed the poet in a pilgrim’s cloak with a book in one hand, the other hand covering his eyes). Despite this, nationalist circles unleashed an antisemitic campaign, striking at both the artistic and iconographic value of the statue. A rich variety of rhetorical means, from wit to virulent mockery, prove that it was not aesthetic preferences that played a dominant role here, but Henryk Kuna’s background, which influenced the evaluation and interpretation of his work.
“主啊,把我们从空中、饥饿和库纳雕像中拯救出来。”关于Adam Mickiewicz维尔纽斯纪念碑的反犹太主义争议
“来自空气、饥饿和库纳的纪念碑保护我们,上帝”:关于亚当·米凯维奇维尔纽斯纪念碑的反犹太主义争议1918年波兰重新独立后,相当多的波兰犹太人希望共同创造波兰文化,但在民族主义者眼中,这并没有得到认可,他们是民族文化纯洁性的捍卫者。犹太裔作家和艺术家,尤其是那些被同化的作家和艺术家成为攻击的主要目标和社会排斥的受害者。犹太裔雕塑家Henryk Kuna向维尔纽斯市提出的Adam Mickiewicz纪念碑的故事可以作为一个案例研究,完美地说明了当时社会广大民众的怨恨力量和记者的影响力。库纳的项目是维尔纽斯米凯维奇纪念碑的第三个项目(继兹比格涅夫·普罗纳斯科的先锋派纪念碑和斯坦尼斯瓦夫·苏卡尔斯基的象征主义纪念碑之后),在1932年的一次比赛中被选中。与之前的作品不同,无论是在形式上(它代表了现代化的古典主义)还是在象征意义上(它展示了诗人穿着朝圣者的斗篷,一只手拿着一本书,另一只手捂住眼睛),它似乎都没有争议。尽管如此,民族主义圈子还是发起了一场反犹太主义运动,对雕像的艺术和图像价值进行了抨击。从机智到恶毒的嘲讽,各种各样的修辞手段证明,在这里起主导作用的不是审美偏好,而是亨里克·库纳的背景,这影响了对他的作品的评价和解读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia Judaica
Studia Judaica Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Studia Judaica, as an organ of the Polish Association for Jewish Studies, is open to its members and all other scholars interested in a wide area of Jewish studies, such as Jewish history, literature, linguistics, archeology, culture, religion, and more. We aim to publish articles and reviews illustrating current development in a wide area of Jewish studies as conducted by the members of the Association. Our periodical is open also to non-members on assumption the article deals with an aspect of Polish-Jewish studies. By this we hope to create a representative platform of Jewish studies in and on Poland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信