Profile of egyptian patients with borderline personality disorder with and without comorbidity

Reem H. El Ghamry, A. Omar, N. Zaki, H. Elshahawi, Dina Naoom, Reem Hashim, M. Morsy
{"title":"Profile of egyptian patients with borderline personality disorder with and without comorbidity","authors":"Reem H. El Ghamry, A. Omar, N. Zaki, H. Elshahawi, Dina Naoom, Reem Hashim, M. Morsy","doi":"10.4103/ejpsy.ejpsy_4_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a complex psychiatric disorder associated with a wide range of psychopathology, including unstable mood, impulsive behavior, and suicidality, which is a defining feature of borderline, as well as high rates of axis I comorbidity. Aim To identify the profile of psychiatric comorbidity among patients with BPD and to compare them with a group of patients with BPD without comorbidity regarding some demographic variables, suicidal behavior, impulsivity, and functioning. Methods Structural Clinical Interviewing was done for DSM-IV axis I and axis II diagnoses. We recruited 30 patients with BPD, without axis I comorbidity (group I) and other 31 patients with BPD with comorbidity (group II). We compared both groups regarding different demographic variables, family circumstances impulsivity, suicidality, and functioning using suicide behavior questionnaire − revised, Barratt impulsiveness scale II, and global assessment of function. Results Patients with BPD in group II had one additional diagnosis, mainly major depression (35.5%), substance-related disorder (35.5%), anxiety disorder (16.1%), whereas bipolar disorder and eating disorders were equally rated (6.5% each). Group II patients scored significantly higher in the total suicidality scores using suicide behavior questionnaire − revised than group I, yet the two groups did not differ significantly in impulsivity scores. Meanwhile, the former group was significantly younger (P=0.05), and they started their illness and seeked treatment at a younger age with more history of previous hospitalization than did group I. In addition, their global assessment of function is significantly impaired (P=0.002). Conclusion Comorbidities in patients with BPD are high, mainly major depression and substance-related disorders, which are associated with increased suicidality behavior, hospital admission, and impaired functioning. Data obtained conveys the need to give high priority to recognize the comorbidities that pose risk on the lives of patients with BPD.","PeriodicalId":76626,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian journal of psychiatry : official journal of the Egyptian Psychiatric Association","volume":"42 1","pages":"115 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian journal of psychiatry : official journal of the Egyptian Psychiatric Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejpsy.ejpsy_4_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a complex psychiatric disorder associated with a wide range of psychopathology, including unstable mood, impulsive behavior, and suicidality, which is a defining feature of borderline, as well as high rates of axis I comorbidity. Aim To identify the profile of psychiatric comorbidity among patients with BPD and to compare them with a group of patients with BPD without comorbidity regarding some demographic variables, suicidal behavior, impulsivity, and functioning. Methods Structural Clinical Interviewing was done for DSM-IV axis I and axis II diagnoses. We recruited 30 patients with BPD, without axis I comorbidity (group I) and other 31 patients with BPD with comorbidity (group II). We compared both groups regarding different demographic variables, family circumstances impulsivity, suicidality, and functioning using suicide behavior questionnaire − revised, Barratt impulsiveness scale II, and global assessment of function. Results Patients with BPD in group II had one additional diagnosis, mainly major depression (35.5%), substance-related disorder (35.5%), anxiety disorder (16.1%), whereas bipolar disorder and eating disorders were equally rated (6.5% each). Group II patients scored significantly higher in the total suicidality scores using suicide behavior questionnaire − revised than group I, yet the two groups did not differ significantly in impulsivity scores. Meanwhile, the former group was significantly younger (P=0.05), and they started their illness and seeked treatment at a younger age with more history of previous hospitalization than did group I. In addition, their global assessment of function is significantly impaired (P=0.002). Conclusion Comorbidities in patients with BPD are high, mainly major depression and substance-related disorders, which are associated with increased suicidality behavior, hospital admission, and impaired functioning. Data obtained conveys the need to give high priority to recognize the comorbidities that pose risk on the lives of patients with BPD.
埃及边缘型人格障碍伴或无合并症患者的概况
边缘型人格障碍(BPD)是一种复杂的精神障碍,与广泛的精神病理相关,包括情绪不稳定、冲动行为和自杀倾向,这是边缘型人格障碍的定义特征,同时也是I轴合并症的高发率。目的确定BPD患者精神共病的概况,并将其与一组无共病的BPD患者在一些人口统计学变量、自杀行为、冲动和功能方面进行比较。方法对DSM-IV I轴和II轴诊断进行结构性临床访谈。我们招募了30名无轴I合并症的BPD患者(I组)和31名有轴I合并症的BPD患者(II组)。我们使用自杀行为问卷、Barratt冲动性量表II和整体功能评估来比较两组不同的人口统计学变量、家庭环境冲动性、自杀倾向和功能。结果第二组BPD患者有一个额外的诊断,主要是重度抑郁症(35.5%)、物质相关障碍(35.5%)、焦虑症(16.1%),而双相情感障碍和饮食障碍同样被评估(各6.5%)。在自杀行为问卷中,第二组患者的总自杀得分明显高于第一组,但两组在冲动性得分上无显著差异。与ⅰ组相比,ⅰ组明显年轻化(P=0.05),发病和就诊年龄较轻,既往住院史较多,整体功能评估明显受损(P=0.002)。结论BPD患者的合并症较高,主要为重度抑郁和物质相关障碍,与自杀行为、住院率和功能障碍增加有关。获得的数据表明,需要高度重视对BPD患者生命构成威胁的合并症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信