Mortality Predictors of Pre-variant SARS-CoV-2 Infected ARDS Patients Receiving Favipiravir and Tocilizumab

IF 0.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
F. Yıldırım, Meltem Şimşek, M. Apaydin, I. Karaman, Halil Ibrahim Dural
{"title":"Mortality Predictors of Pre-variant SARS-CoV-2 Infected ARDS Patients Receiving Favipiravir and Tocilizumab","authors":"F. Yıldırım, Meltem Şimşek, M. Apaydin, I. Karaman, Halil Ibrahim Dural","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-1666161/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nIn this study, viral clearance (oronasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR negativity) and intensive care outcomes and risk factors affecting mortality of critically ill patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who received tocilizumab and favipiravir treatments together before vaccination were investigated.\n\n\n\nThe data of patients who were followed up and treated between 1 July 2020 and 5 October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data of the patients (age, gender), oro-nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR and classification of ARDS, respiratory support treatments, all medical treatments, and ICU outcomes were recorded.\n\n\n\nTotally, 60 patients with a median age of 69.8 [24-87], 25 females and 35 males were included in the study. Mean APACHE II score was 18.9±8.0; and SOFA score was 4.5±2.0. Thirty-four (56.7%) patients were intubated during follow-up. Tocilizumab was given on average of 2.5th day (±2.0 days). On the day of tocilizumab administration, 1 (1.7%) patient had mild ARDS, 30 (50.0%) had moderate ARDS, 29 (48.3%) had severe ARDS. PaO2/FIO2 on the day of tocilizumab administration was 96.7±36.6 mmHg. Forty (66.7%) patients died, while 20 (33.3%) patients transferred to the service. The mean length of stay in the ICU was 11.4±5.5 days. Advanced age [Hazard ratio (HR) 1.8; 95% confidense interval (CI) 0.88-0.93; p< 0.001), higher APACHE II score (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.98; p=0.001), higher SOFA score on the day of tocilizumab administration (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.39-0.79; p=0.001), and lower PaO2/FIO2 ratio (HR 2.54, 95% CI 2.33-3.79; p<0.001) were determined as independent risk factors for mortality.\n\n\n\nPatients who were administered tocilizumab and favipiravir together in our intensive care unit were mostly patients with severe ARDS and had higher inflammatory markers. High mortality was attributed to the use of tocilizumab as an add-on treatment, not as a routine treatment.\n","PeriodicalId":44030,"journal":{"name":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1666161/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, viral clearance (oronasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR negativity) and intensive care outcomes and risk factors affecting mortality of critically ill patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who received tocilizumab and favipiravir treatments together before vaccination were investigated. The data of patients who were followed up and treated between 1 July 2020 and 5 October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic data of the patients (age, gender), oro-nasopharyngeal swab RT-PCR and classification of ARDS, respiratory support treatments, all medical treatments, and ICU outcomes were recorded. Totally, 60 patients with a median age of 69.8 [24-87], 25 females and 35 males were included in the study. Mean APACHE II score was 18.9±8.0; and SOFA score was 4.5±2.0. Thirty-four (56.7%) patients were intubated during follow-up. Tocilizumab was given on average of 2.5th day (±2.0 days). On the day of tocilizumab administration, 1 (1.7%) patient had mild ARDS, 30 (50.0%) had moderate ARDS, 29 (48.3%) had severe ARDS. PaO2/FIO2 on the day of tocilizumab administration was 96.7±36.6 mmHg. Forty (66.7%) patients died, while 20 (33.3%) patients transferred to the service. The mean length of stay in the ICU was 11.4±5.5 days. Advanced age [Hazard ratio (HR) 1.8; 95% confidense interval (CI) 0.88-0.93; p< 0.001), higher APACHE II score (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.98; p=0.001), higher SOFA score on the day of tocilizumab administration (HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.39-0.79; p=0.001), and lower PaO2/FIO2 ratio (HR 2.54, 95% CI 2.33-3.79; p<0.001) were determined as independent risk factors for mortality. Patients who were administered tocilizumab and favipiravir together in our intensive care unit were mostly patients with severe ARDS and had higher inflammatory markers. High mortality was attributed to the use of tocilizumab as an add-on treatment, not as a routine treatment.
服用Favipiravir和Tocilizumab的SARS-CoV-2变异前感染ARDS患者的死亡率预测因素
在这项研究中,调查了在疫苗接种前同时接受托西珠单抗和法匹拉韦治疗的COVID-19相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)危重患者的病毒清除率(口咽拭子RT-PCR阴性)、重症监护结果和影响其死亡率的危险因素。对2020年7月1日至2020年10月5日期间接受随访和治疗的患者的数据进行回顾性分析。记录患者的人口统计学数据(年龄、性别)、鼻咽拭子RT-PCR和ARDS分类、呼吸支持治疗、所有药物治疗和ICU结果。共有60名患者,中位年龄为69.8[24-87],25名女性和35名男性被纳入研究。平均APACHE II评分为18.9±8.0;SOFA评分为4.5±2.0。34名(56.7%)患者在随访期间进行了插管。托奇利珠单抗平均给药2.5天(±2.0天)。托西利珠单抗给药当天,1名(1.7%)患者出现轻度ARDS,30名(50.0%)患者出现中度ARDS,29名(48.3%)患者出现严重ARDS。托西利珠单抗给药当天的PaO2/FIO2为96.7±36.6mmHg。40名(66.7%)患者死亡,20名(33.3%)患者转入该服务。ICU的平均住院时间为11.4±5.5天。高龄[危险比(HR)1.8;95%置信区间(CI)0.88-0.93;p<0.001),APACHE II评分较高(HR 0.81,95%CI 0.74-0.98;p=0.001),托西珠单抗给药当天SOFA评分较高(HR1.47,95%CI 0.39-0.79;p=001),PaO2/FIO2比值较低(HR 2.54,95%CI 2.33-3.79;p<0.001)被确定为死亡率的独立危险因素。在我们的重症监护室同时服用托西利珠单抗和法匹拉韦的患者大多是严重ARDS患者,并且具有较高的炎症标志物。高死亡率归因于使用托西利珠单抗作为附加治疗,而不是常规治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews publishes frontier reviews on all the latest advances on respiratory diseases and its related areas e.g. pharmacology, pathogenesis, clinical care, and therapy. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles dedicated to clinical research in the field. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians in respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信