"Students with Academic Difficulties: Benefits of a Study Skills Group Compared to an Emotional Skills Group"

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
C. Meneghetti, Nicole Casali, Mary Fabris, Debora Palamà, Roberta Rizzato, Claudia Zamperlin, M. Zavagnin, R. De Beni
{"title":"\"Students with Academic Difficulties: Benefits of a Study Skills Group\nCompared to an Emotional Skills Group\"","authors":"C. Meneghetti, Nicole Casali, Mary Fabris, Debora Palamà, Roberta Rizzato, Claudia Zamperlin, M. Zavagnin, R. De Beni","doi":"10.24193/jebp.2021.2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Students can encounter difficulties in their academic careers, regarding their\nstudying skills, for instance, or experiencing negative emotions. Both are\namenable to training and related to one another. This study aimed to examine\nthe efficacy of two interventions focusing on studying skills or emotional\nskills. Two groups of students with academic difficulties participated: 30\nworked on study-related aspects (Study skills group); and the other 30\nattended lessons on emotions in everyday life (Emotional skills group). They\nwere tested before and after the training on measures of their motivation to\nlearn, self–regulated learning strategies, and emotions (positive and negative\nemotions). The results showed that both groups benefited from the training.\nThe Study skills group improved specifically in incremental theory of\nintelligence (d=0.94, p<0.001), self–regulated learning strategies\n(organization: d=0.74, p<0.001; elaboration: d=0.58, p<0.001; preparing for\nexams: d=0.78, p<0.001, specific effects), and more positive emotions about\ntheir academic performance (d=0.64, p<0.001, transfer effect). The\nEmotional skills group showed smaller effects on study-related aspects\n(0.10≤d≤0.49), with a large effect on negative emotions about the self (d=–\n.87). These results offer insight on how to approach students’ academic\ndifficulties.\"","PeriodicalId":43042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Psychotherapies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/jebp.2021.2.13","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Students can encounter difficulties in their academic careers, regarding their studying skills, for instance, or experiencing negative emotions. Both are amenable to training and related to one another. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of two interventions focusing on studying skills or emotional skills. Two groups of students with academic difficulties participated: 30 worked on study-related aspects (Study skills group); and the other 30 attended lessons on emotions in everyday life (Emotional skills group). They were tested before and after the training on measures of their motivation to learn, self–regulated learning strategies, and emotions (positive and negative emotions). The results showed that both groups benefited from the training. The Study skills group improved specifically in incremental theory of intelligence (d=0.94, p<0.001), self–regulated learning strategies (organization: d=0.74, p<0.001; elaboration: d=0.58, p<0.001; preparing for exams: d=0.78, p<0.001, specific effects), and more positive emotions about their academic performance (d=0.64, p<0.001, transfer effect). The Emotional skills group showed smaller effects on study-related aspects (0.10≤d≤0.49), with a large effect on negative emotions about the self (d=– .87). These results offer insight on how to approach students’ academic difficulties."
“学业困难学生:学习技能小组与情感技能小组的优势”
“学生们可能会在学术生涯中遇到困难,比如学习技能,或者经历负面情绪。两者都可以接受训练,并且相互关联。本研究旨在检验两种干预措施的效果,分别关注学习技能和情感技能。两组有学习困难的学生参加:30人在学习相关方面工作(学习技能组);另外30人参加了关于日常生活中情绪的课程(情感技能组)。在训练前后对他们进行了学习动机、自我调节学习策略和情绪(积极情绪和消极情绪)的测试。结果显示,两组人都从训练中受益。学习技能组在智力增量理论(d=0.94, p<0.001)、自我调节学习策略(组织:d=0.74, p<0.001;细化:d=0.58, p<0.001;备考:d=0.78, p<0.001,特定效应),以及对学业表现有更积极的情绪(d=0.64, p<0.001,转移效应)。情绪技能组在学习相关方面的影响较小(0.10≤d≤0.49),对自我负面情绪的影响较大(d= - 0.87)。这些结果为如何解决学生的学业困难提供了见解。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The journal is devoted to the advancement of the clinical theory and practice of evidence-based psychotherapies (EBP) (e.g., evidence-based psychological assessments, evidence-based psychological treatments). The journal publishes original papers dealing with EBP and psychology, psychiatry, the medical and mental specialties, and allied areas of science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信