Methinee Intarates, T. Dhippayom, N. Upakdee, V. Leesmidt, Jain Weraphong, M. Bangpan
{"title":"How area health management leads to improved equity in health: a scoping review","authors":"Methinee Intarates, T. Dhippayom, N. Upakdee, V. Leesmidt, Jain Weraphong, M. Bangpan","doi":"10.56808/2586-940x.1010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : The scoping review of published studies aims to explore what practices and processes can improve equity (horizontal and vertical) in countries that adopted Area Health Management (AHM) utilizing the “ Six Building Blocks Plus ” (SBBP) concept. Method : An electronic search was conducted from the inception to January 27, 2021, from 6 databases (Embase, Social Sciences, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, and WHO) and the gray literature. The inclusion criteria were AH, SBBP, and equity. Data extraction was using a standardized data collection form. Results : This scoping review includes 63 full-text studies. SBBP are identical in the horizontal and vertical equity. However, the majority of SBBP were health service delivery, leadership & governance, and health workforce. The result showed the practice and process to improve health equity were related to a health service delivery (HSD). Conclusion : The included study showed horizontal and vertical equity. The equity measurement focused on utilization. AHM utilizing SBBP was mostly showed in HSD, HWF, leadership & governance. This review indicates that HSD could improve equity or cooperate with other SBBP by increasing healthcare accessibility and utilization. The demographic factor that affected equity is ethnicity. Therefore, HSD in area health was crucial in enhancing health promotion equity in different areas, speci fi c diseases, and target patients.","PeriodicalId":15935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56808/2586-940x.1010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background : The scoping review of published studies aims to explore what practices and processes can improve equity (horizontal and vertical) in countries that adopted Area Health Management (AHM) utilizing the “ Six Building Blocks Plus ” (SBBP) concept. Method : An electronic search was conducted from the inception to January 27, 2021, from 6 databases (Embase, Social Sciences, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, and WHO) and the gray literature. The inclusion criteria were AH, SBBP, and equity. Data extraction was using a standardized data collection form. Results : This scoping review includes 63 full-text studies. SBBP are identical in the horizontal and vertical equity. However, the majority of SBBP were health service delivery, leadership & governance, and health workforce. The result showed the practice and process to improve health equity were related to a health service delivery (HSD). Conclusion : The included study showed horizontal and vertical equity. The equity measurement focused on utilization. AHM utilizing SBBP was mostly showed in HSD, HWF, leadership & governance. This review indicates that HSD could improve equity or cooperate with other SBBP by increasing healthcare accessibility and utilization. The demographic factor that affected equity is ethnicity. Therefore, HSD in area health was crucial in enhancing health promotion equity in different areas, speci fi c diseases, and target patients.
背景:对已发表研究的范围审查旨在探讨在采用“六个构建块+”(SBBP)概念的地区健康管理(AHM)的国家,哪些做法和流程可以提高公平性(横向和纵向)。方法:从成立到2021年1月27日,从6个数据库(Embase、Social Sciences、Web of Science、PubMed、CINAHL和世界卫生组织)和灰色文献中进行电子检索。纳入标准为AH、SBBP和衡平法。数据提取使用标准化的数据收集表格。结果:本范围审查包括63项全文研究。SBBP在横向和纵向股权方面是相同的。然而,SBBP的大多数是医疗服务提供、领导和治理以及卫生工作人员。结果表明,提高健康公平的实践和过程与健康服务提供(HSD)有关。结论:纳入的研究显示出横向和纵向的公平性。权益计量侧重于利用率。AHM利用SBBP主要表现在HSD、HWF、领导力和治理方面。这篇综述表明,HSD可以通过提高医疗保健的可及性和利用率来提高公平性或与其他SBBP合作。影响公平的人口因素是种族。因此,区域健康中的HSD对于提高不同地区、特定疾病和目标患者的健康促进公平性至关重要。