Autonomic Dysreflexia Severity between Urodynamics and Cystoscopy in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury above T6

Heyi Zhen, Tianhai Huang, Xiaoyi Yang, Qiuling Liu, Qingqing Li, Ma-ping Huang, Hui Chen
{"title":"Autonomic Dysreflexia Severity between Urodynamics and Cystoscopy in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury above T6","authors":"Heyi Zhen, Tianhai Huang, Xiaoyi Yang, Qiuling Liu, Qingqing Li, Ma-ping Huang, Hui Chen","doi":"10.4236/ijcm.2021.128031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective is to evaluate autonomic dysreflexia (AD) severity between urodynamics and cystoscopy in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) above thoracic 6 (T6). Design: It is a cross-sectional survey. Subject and methods: The study was carried out in 22 patients with SCI above T6 who underwent both procedures of urodynamics and cystoscopy; all patients developed episodes of AD. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured and recorded at the beginning and during the various stages of the two examinations. AD was defined as a rise in SBP above 20 mm Hg. Results: There was no significant difference in SBP and DBP at baseline before urodynamics and cystoscopy. Both urodynamics and cystoscopy triggered episodes of AD. The volume of water instilled during cystoscopy was typically standard and smaller (150 mL) in comparison with urodynamics, where volume varied depending on cystometric bladder capacity (the mean bladder volume in our study was 234.86 ± 139.06 mL). The SBP was significantly different between cystoscopy and urodynamics (49.23 ± 23.07 mm Hg and 35.14 ± 15.75 mm Hg, respectively; P = 0.023). Conclusions: Although bladder distension during cystoscopy was less than that in urodynamics, the severity of AD was more pronounced during cystoscopy. It is recommended that monitoring of cardiovascular parameters during these procedures should be routinely performed.","PeriodicalId":58771,"journal":{"name":"临床医学国际期刊(英文)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"临床医学国际期刊(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/ijcm.2021.128031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The objective is to evaluate autonomic dysreflexia (AD) severity between urodynamics and cystoscopy in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) above thoracic 6 (T6). Design: It is a cross-sectional survey. Subject and methods: The study was carried out in 22 patients with SCI above T6 who underwent both procedures of urodynamics and cystoscopy; all patients developed episodes of AD. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured and recorded at the beginning and during the various stages of the two examinations. AD was defined as a rise in SBP above 20 mm Hg. Results: There was no significant difference in SBP and DBP at baseline before urodynamics and cystoscopy. Both urodynamics and cystoscopy triggered episodes of AD. The volume of water instilled during cystoscopy was typically standard and smaller (150 mL) in comparison with urodynamics, where volume varied depending on cystometric bladder capacity (the mean bladder volume in our study was 234.86 ± 139.06 mL). The SBP was significantly different between cystoscopy and urodynamics (49.23 ± 23.07 mm Hg and 35.14 ± 15.75 mm Hg, respectively; P = 0.023). Conclusions: Although bladder distension during cystoscopy was less than that in urodynamics, the severity of AD was more pronounced during cystoscopy. It is recommended that monitoring of cardiovascular parameters during these procedures should be routinely performed.
T6以上脊髓损伤患者自主反射障碍尿动力学和膀胱镜检查的严重程度
目的:目的是评估尿动力学和膀胱镜检查在胸椎6段以上(T6)脊髓损伤(SCI)患者中的自主神经反射障碍(AD)严重程度。设计:这是一个横断面调查。研究对象和方法:研究对象为22例T6以上的脊髓损伤患者,他们接受了尿动力学和膀胱镜检查;所有患者均出现阿尔茨海默病发作。测量并记录两组患者的收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)。AD被定义为收缩压升高超过20 mm Hg。结果:在尿动力学和膀胱镜检查前,基线收缩压和舒张压无显著差异。尿动力学和膀胱镜检查均可引发AD发作。与尿动力学相比,膀胱镜检查时的输注水量通常是标准的,较小(150毫升),尿动力学的输注水量取决于膀胱容量(我们研究中的平均膀胱容量为234.86±139.06毫升)。膀胱镜检查与尿动力学检查的收缩压差异有统计学意义(分别为49.23±23.07 mm Hg和35.14±15.75 mm Hg);P = 0.023)。结论:虽然膀胱镜检查时膀胱膨胀小于尿动力学检查时,但膀胱镜检查时AD的严重程度更为明显。建议在这些过程中对心血管参数进行常规监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
953
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书