Editorial

IF 0.9 Q3 WOMENS STUDIES
Eyja M. Brynjarsdóttir, I. Erlingsdottir, Jón Ingvar Kjaran
{"title":"Editorial","authors":"Eyja M. Brynjarsdóttir, I. Erlingsdottir, Jón Ingvar Kjaran","doi":"10.1080/08038740.2023.2171728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We in the Icelandic editorial team are proud and excited to present our first NORA issue, which is the first issue of 2023. We are grateful to the members of the previous editorial team in Denmark for their help and advice during a smooth transition process. The current issue presents a variety of topics highlighting the intersection of race and gender in culture as well as workplace inequalities. The topic of Linnéa Bruno’s and Tanja Joelsson’s paper is violence prevention in which the American MVP program is evaluated at selected Swedish compulsory schools (students aged 13–19 years) by using the ethnographic approach. The aim of the paper is to explore how the female participants perceived their classroom environment and which strategies were used to create a “transformative space” of learning about sexual/sexualized violence. The paper gives rich empirical (ethnographic) examples of how conversation around sexual/sexualized violence is conducted within classroom settings, adding to the overall knowledge within the prevention/intervention literature, particularly with the focus on young people. The authors conclude that in prevention work at school level, it is important to attend well to competence and commitment as well as being aware of precarious nature of such work and how it might affect the endeavour of transforming the classroom into a non-oppressive space. Furthermore, they emphasize the importance of balancing critical feminist views of violence and seeing boys and men as allies in any prevention education/ work with regard to sexual/sexualized violence. Mika Hagerlid focuses on the racial construction of women who have experienced racial hate crime in the paper “Discursive Constructions of Race and Gender in Racial Hate Crime Targeting Women in Sweden”. She uses intersectional theory along with discourse analysis in interpreting nine interviews with women who have experienced racial hate crime. In so doing, the study contributes to the knowledge of how racial hate crimes are understood and interpreted by female victims from diverse ethnic/racial background. The results show that women experience racial hate crimes differently than men. Furthermore, as Mika demonstrates well in the paper, female victims often become entangled in racial power struggles between men. In fact, their bodies, as argued by Mika, are often used as a “tool in racial status conflicts”. Thus, Mika’s paper contributes to the ongoing discussion on the intersection of race/ethnicity and gender within the Nordic context in which the myth of the Nordic gender equality paradise is repudiated, at least in terms of what it means to be a woman with a diverse racial or ethnic background. In “Feminist Academics Strategically Playing Offense/Defense in Pursue of Academic and Societal Change”, Thamar Melanie Heijstra and Gyða Margrét Pétursdóttir consider the status of feminist activists in Icelandic academia, in an environment characterized by the masculinized neoliberal academic game. They interviewed 20 senior feminist academics in Iceland about various aspects of their working conditions. Building on a theoretical concept of the precarious precondition for change, they found that these academics were building small-scale communities with potential for growth and for serving as an antidote to neoliberalism. Workplace inequality in a neoliberal world is also the focus of Britt-Inger Keisu and Helene Brodin‘s paper “Postfeminism as Coping Strategy: Understandings of Gender and Intragroup Conflict among Swedish Welfare Workers”. Even though Sweden tends to be ranked near the top for gender equality, it has a high rate of occupational gender segregation. Keisu and Brodin investigated how welfare workers in three women-dominated workplaces—a school, a geriatric care ward and a social-work office—speak about gender and intragroup conflict in relation to their field of work. They found that the workers tended to ignore or push aside gender inequalities in NORA—NORDIC JOURNAL OF FEMINIST AND GENDER RESEARCH 2023, VOL. 31, NO. 1, 1–2 https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2023.2171728","PeriodicalId":45485,"journal":{"name":"NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NORA-Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2023.2171728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We in the Icelandic editorial team are proud and excited to present our first NORA issue, which is the first issue of 2023. We are grateful to the members of the previous editorial team in Denmark for their help and advice during a smooth transition process. The current issue presents a variety of topics highlighting the intersection of race and gender in culture as well as workplace inequalities. The topic of Linnéa Bruno’s and Tanja Joelsson’s paper is violence prevention in which the American MVP program is evaluated at selected Swedish compulsory schools (students aged 13–19 years) by using the ethnographic approach. The aim of the paper is to explore how the female participants perceived their classroom environment and which strategies were used to create a “transformative space” of learning about sexual/sexualized violence. The paper gives rich empirical (ethnographic) examples of how conversation around sexual/sexualized violence is conducted within classroom settings, adding to the overall knowledge within the prevention/intervention literature, particularly with the focus on young people. The authors conclude that in prevention work at school level, it is important to attend well to competence and commitment as well as being aware of precarious nature of such work and how it might affect the endeavour of transforming the classroom into a non-oppressive space. Furthermore, they emphasize the importance of balancing critical feminist views of violence and seeing boys and men as allies in any prevention education/ work with regard to sexual/sexualized violence. Mika Hagerlid focuses on the racial construction of women who have experienced racial hate crime in the paper “Discursive Constructions of Race and Gender in Racial Hate Crime Targeting Women in Sweden”. She uses intersectional theory along with discourse analysis in interpreting nine interviews with women who have experienced racial hate crime. In so doing, the study contributes to the knowledge of how racial hate crimes are understood and interpreted by female victims from diverse ethnic/racial background. The results show that women experience racial hate crimes differently than men. Furthermore, as Mika demonstrates well in the paper, female victims often become entangled in racial power struggles between men. In fact, their bodies, as argued by Mika, are often used as a “tool in racial status conflicts”. Thus, Mika’s paper contributes to the ongoing discussion on the intersection of race/ethnicity and gender within the Nordic context in which the myth of the Nordic gender equality paradise is repudiated, at least in terms of what it means to be a woman with a diverse racial or ethnic background. In “Feminist Academics Strategically Playing Offense/Defense in Pursue of Academic and Societal Change”, Thamar Melanie Heijstra and Gyða Margrét Pétursdóttir consider the status of feminist activists in Icelandic academia, in an environment characterized by the masculinized neoliberal academic game. They interviewed 20 senior feminist academics in Iceland about various aspects of their working conditions. Building on a theoretical concept of the precarious precondition for change, they found that these academics were building small-scale communities with potential for growth and for serving as an antidote to neoliberalism. Workplace inequality in a neoliberal world is also the focus of Britt-Inger Keisu and Helene Brodin‘s paper “Postfeminism as Coping Strategy: Understandings of Gender and Intragroup Conflict among Swedish Welfare Workers”. Even though Sweden tends to be ranked near the top for gender equality, it has a high rate of occupational gender segregation. Keisu and Brodin investigated how welfare workers in three women-dominated workplaces—a school, a geriatric care ward and a social-work office—speak about gender and intragroup conflict in relation to their field of work. They found that the workers tended to ignore or push aside gender inequalities in NORA—NORDIC JOURNAL OF FEMINIST AND GENDER RESEARCH 2023, VOL. 31, NO. 1, 1–2 https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2023.2171728
编辑
我们冰岛编辑团队非常自豪和兴奋地推出我们的第一期NORA,这是2023年的第一期。我们感谢丹麦前任编辑团队成员在平稳过渡过程中提供的帮助和建议。本期提供了各种主题,突出了文化中种族和性别的交叉以及工作场所的不平等。Linnéa Bruno和Tanja Joelsson论文的主题是暴力预防,其中通过民族志方法在选定的瑞典义务学校(13-19岁的学生)评估美国MVP计划。本文的目的是探讨女性参与者如何感知自己的课堂环境,以及使用哪些策略来创造一个学习性暴力/性暴力的“变革空间”。这篇论文提供了丰富的实证(人种学)例子,说明了如何在课堂环境中围绕性暴力/性暴力进行对话,增加了预防/干预文献中的整体知识,特别是在关注年轻人的情况下。作者得出的结论是,在学校一级的预防工作中,重要的是要注意能力和承诺,并意识到这种工作的不稳定性质,以及它可能如何影响将课堂转变为非压迫性空间的努力。此外,他们强调必须平衡对暴力的批判女权主义观点,并将男孩和男子视为任何关于性暴力/性暴力的预防教育/工作的盟友。Mika Hagerlid在《瑞典针对女性的种族仇恨犯罪中的种族和性别的话语建构》一文中关注了经历过种族仇恨犯罪的女性的种族建构。她使用交叉理论和话语分析来解释对经历过种族仇恨犯罪的女性的九次采访。通过这样做,这项研究有助于了解来自不同种族/种族背景的女性受害者如何理解和解释种族仇恨犯罪。研究结果表明,女性经历种族仇恨犯罪的方式与男性不同。此外,正如米卡在论文中很好地证明的那样,女性受害者经常卷入男性之间的种族权力斗争。事实上,正如米卡所说,他们的身体经常被用作“种族地位冲突的工具”。因此,米卡的论文为正在进行的关于北欧背景下种族/族裔和性别交叉的讨论做出了贡献,在北欧背景下,北欧性别平等天堂的神话被否定,至少在作为一名具有不同种族或族裔背景的女性意味着什么方面是如此。Thamar Melanie Heijstra和Gyğa Margrét Pétursdóttir在《女权主义学术界在追求学术和社会变革中战略性地进攻/防御》一书中探讨了女权主义活动家在冰岛学术界的地位,其环境以男性化的新自由主义学术游戏为特征。他们采访了冰岛20位资深女权主义学者,了解他们工作条件的各个方面。基于变革的不稳定先决条件的理论概念,他们发现这些学者正在建立具有增长潜力的小规模社区,并将其作为新自由主义的解药。新自由主义世界中的工作场所不平等也是Britt Inger Keisu和Helene Brodin的论文《后女权主义作为应对策略:对瑞典福利工作者中性别和群体内冲突的理解》的重点。尽管瑞典在性别平等方面往往排名靠前,但其职业性别隔离率很高。Keisu和Brodin调查了三个女性占主导地位的工作场所——一所学校、一个老年护理病房和一个社会工作办公室——的福利工作者如何谈论与其工作领域有关的性别和群体内冲突。他们发现,工人们倾向于忽视或搁置北美的性别不平等——《北美女性与性别研究杂志》2023年第31卷第1期,第1-2页https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2023.2171728
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信