Comments on “Tables 1–3 in Mesoamerican-Mississippian interaction across the far Southern Plains by Long-Range Toyah Intermediaries” (Carpenter 2020, Plains Anthropologist)

Q2 Social Sciences
T. Perttula
{"title":"Comments on “Tables 1–3 in Mesoamerican-Mississippian interaction across the far Southern Plains by Long-Range Toyah Intermediaries” (Carpenter 2020, Plains Anthropologist)","authors":"T. Perttula","doi":"10.1080/00320447.2020.1867944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Tables 1–3 of his recent article in Plains Anthropologist, Carpenter (2020) examines the material culture record of contact between the Southwest and the Caddo area as part of a broader consideration of Mesoamerican-Mississippian interaction, focusing on Southwestern ceramics, obsidian, and turquoise found on Caddo sites that he suggested moved along a Toyah corridor. There are errors and omissions in these three tables that overstate the archaeological evidence for Southwestern artifacts in East Texas Caddo sites. First of all, these three tables have errors because they each include a number of non-Caddo sites of Late Prehistoric age (ca. AD 800–1600) found on the East Fork of the Trinity River in the Blackland Prairie in Collin and Rockwall counties (Crook and Hughston 2015; Crook and Perttula 2018:1–2). Ancestral Caddo sites are found to the east of there in the Post Oak Savanna and Pineywoods of East Texas. Carpenter (2020:342) does differentiate these sites in the text but not in Tables 1–3. Table 1 concerns Southwestern ceramics in Caddo sites in East Texas. Carpenter includes eight Caddo sites, all listed in Crook and Perttula (2018:13–16), but omitted two other sites: an unrecorded site in Red River County with likely Upper Gila ware from southern and western New Mexico (ca. AD 1300–1450) and a site in Shelby County with Chupadero Black-on-white (ca. AD 1050– 1550) made in central and southern New Mexico. plains anthropologist, Vol. 66 No. 258, May 2021, 83–85","PeriodicalId":35520,"journal":{"name":"Plains Anthropologist","volume":"66 1","pages":"83 - 85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00320447.2020.1867944","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plains Anthropologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00320447.2020.1867944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Tables 1–3 of his recent article in Plains Anthropologist, Carpenter (2020) examines the material culture record of contact between the Southwest and the Caddo area as part of a broader consideration of Mesoamerican-Mississippian interaction, focusing on Southwestern ceramics, obsidian, and turquoise found on Caddo sites that he suggested moved along a Toyah corridor. There are errors and omissions in these three tables that overstate the archaeological evidence for Southwestern artifacts in East Texas Caddo sites. First of all, these three tables have errors because they each include a number of non-Caddo sites of Late Prehistoric age (ca. AD 800–1600) found on the East Fork of the Trinity River in the Blackland Prairie in Collin and Rockwall counties (Crook and Hughston 2015; Crook and Perttula 2018:1–2). Ancestral Caddo sites are found to the east of there in the Post Oak Savanna and Pineywoods of East Texas. Carpenter (2020:342) does differentiate these sites in the text but not in Tables 1–3. Table 1 concerns Southwestern ceramics in Caddo sites in East Texas. Carpenter includes eight Caddo sites, all listed in Crook and Perttula (2018:13–16), but omitted two other sites: an unrecorded site in Red River County with likely Upper Gila ware from southern and western New Mexico (ca. AD 1300–1450) and a site in Shelby County with Chupadero Black-on-white (ca. AD 1050– 1550) made in central and southern New Mexico. plains anthropologist, Vol. 66 No. 258, May 2021, 83–85
关于“远程托雅中介机构在遥远的南部平原上的中美洲-密西西比互动的表1-3”的评论(Carpenter 2020,平原人类学家)
在他最近发表在《平原人类学》上的文章的表1-3中,Carpenter(2020)研究了西南部和凯多地区之间接触的物质文化记录,作为对中美洲-密西西比人互动的更广泛考虑的一部分,重点关注了在凯多遗址上发现的西南陶瓷、黑石和绿松石,他认为这些陶瓷是沿着托雅走廊移动的。这三个表格中存在错误和遗漏,夸大了东德克萨斯Caddo遗址西南部文物的考古证据。首先,这三个表格都有错误,因为它们都包括一些史前晚期(约公元800–1600年)的非Caddo遗址,这些遗址位于科林县和洛克沃尔县布莱克兰草原的三一河东叉(Crook and Hughston 2015;Crook and Perttula 2018:1-2)。Caddo祖先遗址位于德克萨斯州东部的后橡树草原和松林中。Carpenter(2020:342)在文本中确实区分了这些站点,但在表1-3中没有区分。表1涉及德克萨斯州东部Caddo遗址的西南陶瓷。Carpenter包括八个Caddo遗址,均列在克鲁克和珀图拉(2018:13-16),但省略了另外两个遗址:红河县的一个未记录的遗址,可能有新墨西哥州南部和西部的上吉拉陶器(约公元1300年-1450年),以及谢尔比县的一处遗址,Chupadero黑底白底(约公元1050年-1550年)产于新墨西哥州中部和南部。平原人类学家,第66卷第258期,2021年5月,83-85
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plains Anthropologist
Plains Anthropologist Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信