Comparative-effectiveness of ceftaroline and daptomycin as first-line MRSA therapy for patients with sepsis admitted to hospitals in the United States Veterans Health Care System.

Hospital practice Pub Date : 2019-10-01 Epub Date: 2019-10-14 DOI:10.1080/21548331.2019.1676540
Marilyn L Mootz, Rachel S Britt, Allison A Mootz, Grace C Lee, Kelly R Reveles, Kirk E Evoy, Chengwen Teng, Christopher R Frei
{"title":"Comparative-effectiveness of ceftaroline and daptomycin as first-line MRSA therapy for patients with sepsis admitted to hospitals in the United States Veterans Health Care System.","authors":"Marilyn L Mootz, Rachel S Britt, Allison A Mootz, Grace C Lee, Kelly R Reveles, Kirk E Evoy, Chengwen Teng, Christopher R Frei","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2019.1676540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives</b>: This study compared hospital readmission and mortality for patients with sepsis who received ceftaroline or daptomycin as first-line MRSA therapy.<b>Methods</b>: This retrospective comparative-effectiveness study included adults ≥18 years old hospitalized in the United States Veterans Health Care System with sepsis between 10/1/2010-9/30/2014, who received ceftaroline or daptomycin within 14 days of hospital admission as the first antibiotic effective against methicillin resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA). Patients with pneumonia, and those who received both study drugs, were excluded. Baseline characteristics were compared using Chi-square, Fischer's exact, Student's t, and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. Patient outcomes were compared with multivariable logistic regression models.<b>Results</b>: 409 patients were included (ceftaroline = 67, daptomycin = 342). Ceftaroline patients were older, less likely to be Black, more likely to have diabetes with complications, and had higher Charlson comorbidity scores. Median (interquartile range) time from admission to drug initiation was 1 (0-1) day for ceftaroline and 1 (1-3) day for daptomycin (p = 0.01). Unadjusted hospital readmission rates for ceftaroline and daptomycin, respectively, were: 30-day (25%/37%, p = 0.06), 60-day (27%/44%, p = 0.008), and 90-day (28%/46%, p = 0.01). Unadjusted mortality rates were: in-hospital (7%/12%, p = 0.4), 30-day (3%/9%, p = 0.1), 60-day (6%/12%, p = 0.2), and 90-day (7%/15%, p = 0.1). In multivariable models with all divergent baseline characteristics included as covariates, patients treated with ceftaroline were less likely to experience (OR, 95% CI): 30/60/90-day hospital readmission (0.54, 0.29-0.98; 0.42, 0.23-0.76; 0.42, 0.23-0.75) and 30/60/90-day mortality (0.23, 0.04-0.82; 0.34, 0.10-0.93; 0.34, 0.11-0.86).<b>Conclusion</b>: In patients with sepsis, ceftaroline was associated with fewer hospital readmissions and lower mortality as compared to daptomycin. Prospective investigations in larger, more generalized cohorts are needed to examine outcomes with specific MRSA therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":75913,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice","volume":"47 1","pages":"186-191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21548331.2019.1676540","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2019.1676540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared hospital readmission and mortality for patients with sepsis who received ceftaroline or daptomycin as first-line MRSA therapy.Methods: This retrospective comparative-effectiveness study included adults ≥18 years old hospitalized in the United States Veterans Health Care System with sepsis between 10/1/2010-9/30/2014, who received ceftaroline or daptomycin within 14 days of hospital admission as the first antibiotic effective against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Patients with pneumonia, and those who received both study drugs, were excluded. Baseline characteristics were compared using Chi-square, Fischer's exact, Student's t, and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests. Patient outcomes were compared with multivariable logistic regression models.Results: 409 patients were included (ceftaroline = 67, daptomycin = 342). Ceftaroline patients were older, less likely to be Black, more likely to have diabetes with complications, and had higher Charlson comorbidity scores. Median (interquartile range) time from admission to drug initiation was 1 (0-1) day for ceftaroline and 1 (1-3) day for daptomycin (p = 0.01). Unadjusted hospital readmission rates for ceftaroline and daptomycin, respectively, were: 30-day (25%/37%, p = 0.06), 60-day (27%/44%, p = 0.008), and 90-day (28%/46%, p = 0.01). Unadjusted mortality rates were: in-hospital (7%/12%, p = 0.4), 30-day (3%/9%, p = 0.1), 60-day (6%/12%, p = 0.2), and 90-day (7%/15%, p = 0.1). In multivariable models with all divergent baseline characteristics included as covariates, patients treated with ceftaroline were less likely to experience (OR, 95% CI): 30/60/90-day hospital readmission (0.54, 0.29-0.98; 0.42, 0.23-0.76; 0.42, 0.23-0.75) and 30/60/90-day mortality (0.23, 0.04-0.82; 0.34, 0.10-0.93; 0.34, 0.11-0.86).Conclusion: In patients with sepsis, ceftaroline was associated with fewer hospital readmissions and lower mortality as compared to daptomycin. Prospective investigations in larger, more generalized cohorts are needed to examine outcomes with specific MRSA therapies.

头孢他林和达托霉素作为一线MRSA治疗美国退伍军人医疗保健系统脓毒症患者的比较疗效
摘要:目的:本研究比较了头孢他林或达托霉素作为一线MRSA治疗的脓毒症患者的再入院率和死亡率。方法:这项回顾性比较疗效研究纳入了2010年10月1日至2014年9月30日期间在美国退伍军人医疗保健系统住院的年龄≥18岁的脓毒症患者,这些患者在入院后14天内接受头孢他林或达托霉素治疗,作为第一种有效的抗耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的抗生素。肺炎患者和同时服用两种研究药物的患者被排除在外。使用卡方检验、Fischer’s exact检验、Student’s t检验和Wilcoxon秩和检验比较基线特征。采用多变量logistic回归模型对患者预后进行比较。结果:纳入409例患者(头孢他林67例,达托霉素342例)。服用头孢他林的患者年龄较大,黑人较少,患糖尿病并伴有并发症的可能性较大,且Charlson合并症评分较高。头孢他林和达托霉素从入院到开始用药的中位时间(四分位数差)分别为1(0-1)天和1(1 - 3)天(p = 0.01)。头孢他林和达托霉素未经调整的再入院率分别为:30天(25%/37%,p = 0.06)、60天(27%/44%,p = 0.008)和90天(28%/46%,p = 0.01)。未经调整的死亡率为:住院(7%/12%,p = 0.4)、30天(3%/9%,p = 0.1)、60天(6%/12%,p = 0.2)和90天(7%/15%,p = 0.1)。在包含所有不同基线特征作为协变量的多变量模型中,接受头孢他林治疗的患者更不可能经历(OR, 95% CI): 30/60/90天再入院(0.54,0.29-0.98;0.42, 0.23 - -0.76;0.42, 0.23 - 0.75)和30/60/90天死亡率(0.23,0.04-0.82;0.34, 0.10 - -0.93;0.34, 0.11 - -0.86)。结论:与达托霉素相比,在脓毒症患者中,头孢他林与更少的再入院率和更低的死亡率相关。需要在更大、更广泛的队列中进行前瞻性调查,以检查特定MRSA治疗的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信