From Idleness to the Abolition of Work in Ricardo Talesnik’s La fiaca

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 CULTURAL STUDIES
Matías Beverinotti
{"title":"From Idleness to the Abolition of Work in Ricardo Talesnik’s La fiaca","authors":"Matías Beverinotti","doi":"10.1080/13569325.2022.2132817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses Ricardo Talesnik’s play and film (directed by Fernando Ayala) La fiaca [ Idleness ] and its critique of the notion of work. Talesnik denounces how modern disciplinary institutions form the workforce and a way-of-life-to-work. He questions the work-system by critiquing the commodity-form, standardised time represented in the money-form, worker subjectivity as a national citizen, and Schuld (debt/guilt). Talesnik’s critique is developed when the play’s main character performs a “Duchamp-like” strike by refusing to go to work. When analysed with Marx’s and Foucault’s theories of production and power, La fiaca could be read as a play that supports the abolition of work to question modern life under late capitalism. Therefore, what this play effectively critiques is the commodification of everyday life, which leaves no option but to create another way of life by interrupting the process of capitalist production of value and questioning the primacy of labour. Talesnik’s play shows the coercive forces of the capitalist mode of production, but also the institutional framework built to correct anyone who dares to challenge it. This makes La fiaca a crucial intervention that helps us understand current post-work criticism and the present tension between work and social reproduction in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.","PeriodicalId":56341,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"475 - 492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13569325.2022.2132817","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses Ricardo Talesnik’s play and film (directed by Fernando Ayala) La fiaca [ Idleness ] and its critique of the notion of work. Talesnik denounces how modern disciplinary institutions form the workforce and a way-of-life-to-work. He questions the work-system by critiquing the commodity-form, standardised time represented in the money-form, worker subjectivity as a national citizen, and Schuld (debt/guilt). Talesnik’s critique is developed when the play’s main character performs a “Duchamp-like” strike by refusing to go to work. When analysed with Marx’s and Foucault’s theories of production and power, La fiaca could be read as a play that supports the abolition of work to question modern life under late capitalism. Therefore, what this play effectively critiques is the commodification of everyday life, which leaves no option but to create another way of life by interrupting the process of capitalist production of value and questioning the primacy of labour. Talesnik’s play shows the coercive forces of the capitalist mode of production, but also the institutional framework built to correct anyone who dares to challenge it. This makes La fiaca a crucial intervention that helps us understand current post-work criticism and the present tension between work and social reproduction in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic.
从懒惰到废除工作——论里卡多·塔莱斯尼克的小说
本文分析了里卡多·塔列斯尼克的戏剧和电影(费尔南多·阿亚拉导演)《懒惰》及其对工作概念的批判。Talesnik谴责现代纪律机构如何形成劳动力和一种生活工作方式。他通过批判商品形式、以货币形式表现的标准化时间、作为国家公民的工人主体性以及Schuld(债务/罪责)来质疑工作系统。当剧中的主角拒绝上班,进行“杜尚式”的罢工时,塔列斯尼克的批评得到了发展。当与马克思和福柯的生产和权力理论进行分析时,La fiaca可以被解读为一部支持废除工作以质疑晚期资本主义下的现代生活的戏剧。因此,这部戏剧有效地批判的是日常生活的商品化,这让人们别无选择,只能通过中断资本主义价值生产过程和质疑劳动的首要地位来创造另一种生活方式。塔列斯尼克的戏剧展示了资本主义生产方式的强制力量,但也展示了为纠正任何敢于挑战它的人而建立的制度框架。这使得《经济危机》成为一项至关重要的干预措施,有助于我们理解当前的工作后批评,以及2019冠状病毒病大流行后工作与社会再生产之间的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信