A Method to the Madness: The Revolutionary Marxist Method of Deleuze and Guattari

Q3 Arts and Humanities
A. Culp
{"title":"A Method to the Madness: The Revolutionary Marxist Method of Deleuze and Guattari","authors":"A. Culp","doi":"10.33280/2310-3817-2019-7-1-158-184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, Andrew Culp looks to how Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari flip Marxism on its head. He makes the case by drawing on Marx’s own distinction between the dialectical mode of presentation and research-based mode of inquiry that went into writing Capital, which leads him to consult the prefaces and afterwords to Capitalin addition to Marxist feminists who discuss the book’s sensational style. Culp then argues that Deleuze and Guattari’s most significant contribution to Marxism is a methodological one, as found in their critical and clinical anthropology, which outlines the universal history of capitalism (diagrammed by Culp in an included chart). The result, he maintains, frees images of radical change from dialectics, liberal democracy, markets, or production as engines of revolution. In their place, he locates a new critique of political economics based on the destruction of economics itself by way of a revolution of the outside.","PeriodicalId":52288,"journal":{"name":"Stasis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stasis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33280/2310-3817-2019-7-1-158-184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this article, Andrew Culp looks to how Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari flip Marxism on its head. He makes the case by drawing on Marx’s own distinction between the dialectical mode of presentation and research-based mode of inquiry that went into writing Capital, which leads him to consult the prefaces and afterwords to Capitalin addition to Marxist feminists who discuss the book’s sensational style. Culp then argues that Deleuze and Guattari’s most significant contribution to Marxism is a methodological one, as found in their critical and clinical anthropology, which outlines the universal history of capitalism (diagrammed by Culp in an included chart). The result, he maintains, frees images of radical change from dialectics, liberal democracy, markets, or production as engines of revolution. In their place, he locates a new critique of political economics based on the destruction of economics itself by way of a revolution of the outside.
疯狂的方法:德勒兹和瓜塔里的革命马克思主义方法
在这篇文章中,Andrew Culp观察了Gilles Deleuze和Felix Guattari如何颠覆马克思主义。他通过借鉴马克思自己在《资本论》一书中所采用的辩证呈现模式和基于研究的探究模式之间的区别来证明这一点,这使他查阅了《资本主义》的序言和后记,以及讨论该书耸人听闻风格的马克思主义女权主义者。卡尔普接着认为,德勒兹和瓜塔里对马克思主义最重要的贡献是方法论的贡献,正如他们的批判和临床人类学所发现的那样,它概述了资本主义的普遍历史(卡尔普在一张包含的图表中绘制)。他坚持认为,其结果是将激进变革的形象从辩证法、自由民主、市场或作为革命引擎的生产中解放出来。在他们的位置上,他定位了一种新的政治经济学批判,基于外部革命对经济学本身的破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stasis
Stasis Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信