What Happened to the K–12 Education Labor Market During COVID? The Acute Need for Better Data Systems

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Joshua Bleiberg, M. Kraft
{"title":"What Happened to the K–12 Education Labor Market During COVID? The Acute Need for Better Data Systems","authors":"Joshua Bleiberg, M. Kraft","doi":"10.1162/edfp_a_00391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic upended the U.S. education system in ways that dramatically affected the jobs of K–12 employees. However, there remains considerable uncertainty about the nature and degree of staffing challenges during the pandemic. We draw on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and State Education Agencies (SEA) to describe patterns in K–12 education employment and to highlight the limitations of available data. Data from the BLS suggest overall employment in the K–12 labor market declined by 9 percent at the onset of the pandemic and remained well below pre-pandemic levels more than two years later. SEA data suggest that teachers did not leave the profession en masse as many predicted, with turnover decreasing in the summer of 2020 and then increasing modestly in 2021 back to pre-pandemic levels. We explore possible explanations for these patterns including weak hiring through the summer of 2020 and high attrition among K–12 instructional support and noninstructional staff. State vacancy data also suggest that schools faced substantial challenges filling open positions during the 2021–22 academic year. Our analyses illustrate the imperative to build nationally representative, detailed, and timely data systems on the K–12 education labor market to better inform policy.","PeriodicalId":46870,"journal":{"name":"Education Finance and Policy","volume":"18 1","pages":"156-172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Finance and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00391","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic upended the U.S. education system in ways that dramatically affected the jobs of K–12 employees. However, there remains considerable uncertainty about the nature and degree of staffing challenges during the pandemic. We draw on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and State Education Agencies (SEA) to describe patterns in K–12 education employment and to highlight the limitations of available data. Data from the BLS suggest overall employment in the K–12 labor market declined by 9 percent at the onset of the pandemic and remained well below pre-pandemic levels more than two years later. SEA data suggest that teachers did not leave the profession en masse as many predicted, with turnover decreasing in the summer of 2020 and then increasing modestly in 2021 back to pre-pandemic levels. We explore possible explanations for these patterns including weak hiring through the summer of 2020 and high attrition among K–12 instructional support and noninstructional staff. State vacancy data also suggest that schools faced substantial challenges filling open positions during the 2021–22 academic year. Our analyses illustrate the imperative to build nationally representative, detailed, and timely data systems on the K–12 education labor market to better inform policy.
COVID期间K-12教育劳动力市场发生了什么?迫切需要更好的数据系统
摘要新冠肺炎疫情颠覆了美国教育系统,极大地影响了K-12员工的工作。然而,疫情期间人员配置挑战的性质和程度仍存在相当大的不确定性。我们利用劳工统计局(BLS)和国家教育机构(SEA)的数据来描述K-12教育就业模式,并强调现有数据的局限性。劳工统计局的数据显示,K-12劳动力市场的总体就业率在疫情开始时下降了9%,两年多后仍远低于疫情前的水平。SEA数据表明,教师并没有像许多人预测的那样集体离职,2020年夏天,教师流动率下降,然后在2021年小幅上升,回到疫情前的水平。我们探讨了这些模式的可能解释,包括2020年夏天的招聘疲软,以及K-12教学支持和非教学人员的高流失率。州空缺数据还表明,学校在2021-22学年填补空缺职位面临巨大挑战。我们的分析表明,必须建立具有全国代表性、详细和及时的K-12教育劳动力市场数据系统,以便更好地为政策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信