Ezra Pound and 20th-Century Theories of Language: Faith with the Word by James Dowthwaite (review)

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Louise Kane
{"title":"Ezra Pound and 20th-Century Theories of Language: Faith with the Word by James Dowthwaite (review)","authors":"Louise Kane","doi":"10.1353/mod.2023.a902614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"219 Making of Americans is rooted in the morphological studies of brain tissue she conducted as a medical student at Johns Hopkins University. A brain is dissected into two-dimensional slices, from which the anatomist must then project its three-dimensional structures; similarly, “Stein’s descriptive method in The Making of Americans is almost sculptural, evoking a spatial quality similar to the sense of volume present in her descriptions of the morphology of neuronal tissues” (215). Finally, in “Clouds” we return to Robertson and her claim that “description is the imagination of matter,” a Lucretian idea by which “description does not operate representationally, as a transparent layer through which phenomena are observed; rather, it operates additively, as a mode of decoration, which elaborates the surfaces of entities” (266–67). A poetics of liveliness adds to or amplifies the phenomena it describes, communicating the activity of materiality to the reader; to return to Elizabeth Grosz’s idea about “the subsistence of the ideal in the material”: “Such a position suggests that ideality is immanent in materiality so as to provide the framing conditions for a nonreductive materialism. In other words, it seeks to ‘frame, orient, and direct material things and processes,’ allowing matter to become other than what it is in the present and to assume meaning” (274). Smailbegović’s gamble follows that of Jane Bennett, who argues that “a touch of anthropomorphism . . . can catalyze a sensibility” that reveals “‘isomorphisms’ across what had previously seemed to be ‘categorical divides’” (164). In other words, her project is to break down reified discourses of materiality by means of a poetics as lively as the nonhuman things it describes, or decorates. It is a significant, serious, yet playful account of how, in the hands of these poetnaturalists, metaphor can be used strategically to liberate readers and their reading matter alike.","PeriodicalId":18699,"journal":{"name":"Modernism/modernity","volume":"30 1","pages":"219 - 221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modernism/modernity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mod.2023.a902614","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

219 Making of Americans is rooted in the morphological studies of brain tissue she conducted as a medical student at Johns Hopkins University. A brain is dissected into two-dimensional slices, from which the anatomist must then project its three-dimensional structures; similarly, “Stein’s descriptive method in The Making of Americans is almost sculptural, evoking a spatial quality similar to the sense of volume present in her descriptions of the morphology of neuronal tissues” (215). Finally, in “Clouds” we return to Robertson and her claim that “description is the imagination of matter,” a Lucretian idea by which “description does not operate representationally, as a transparent layer through which phenomena are observed; rather, it operates additively, as a mode of decoration, which elaborates the surfaces of entities” (266–67). A poetics of liveliness adds to or amplifies the phenomena it describes, communicating the activity of materiality to the reader; to return to Elizabeth Grosz’s idea about “the subsistence of the ideal in the material”: “Such a position suggests that ideality is immanent in materiality so as to provide the framing conditions for a nonreductive materialism. In other words, it seeks to ‘frame, orient, and direct material things and processes,’ allowing matter to become other than what it is in the present and to assume meaning” (274). Smailbegović’s gamble follows that of Jane Bennett, who argues that “a touch of anthropomorphism . . . can catalyze a sensibility” that reveals “‘isomorphisms’ across what had previously seemed to be ‘categorical divides’” (164). In other words, her project is to break down reified discourses of materiality by means of a poetics as lively as the nonhuman things it describes, or decorates. It is a significant, serious, yet playful account of how, in the hands of these poetnaturalists, metaphor can be used strategically to liberate readers and their reading matter alike.
埃兹拉·庞德与20世纪的语言理论:对话语的信仰(James Dowthwaite)
219《塑造美国人》源于她在约翰·霍普金斯大学读医学院时对脑组织进行的形态学研究。大脑被解剖成二维切片,然后解剖学家必须从中投射出它的三维结构;同样,“斯坦因在《美国人的形成》中的描述方法几乎是雕塑式的,唤起了一种空间品质,类似于她在描述神经组织形态时呈现的体积感”(215)。最后,在《云》一书中,我们回到罗伯逊和她的主张,即“描述是对物质的想象”,这是卢克莱特式的观点,“描述不具有代表性,不作为观察现象的透明层;相反,作为一种装饰模式,它的作用是附加的,它详细阐述了实体的表面”(266-67)。生动的诗学增加或放大了它所描述的现象,向读者传达了物质性的活动;回到伊丽莎白·格罗兹关于“理想在物质中生存”的观点:“这种立场表明,理想是内在于物质性的,从而为非还原唯物主义提供了框架条件。换句话说,它寻求“构建、定位和指导物质的事物和过程”,允许物质变得不同于它现在的样子,并赋予其意义”(274)。斯梅尔贝戈维奇的冒险遵循了简·贝内特(Jane Bennett)的观点,后者认为“一点拟人化……可以催化一种感性,“揭示”过去似乎是“绝对划分”的“同构””(164)。换句话说,她的项目是打破物质性的具体化话语,通过一种诗学,就像它所描述或装饰的非人类事物一样生动。这是一个重要的,严肃的,但有趣的叙述,在这些诗人自然主义者的手中,隐喻可以被策略性地使用,以解放读者和他们的阅读材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Modernism/modernity
Modernism/modernity HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Concentrating on the period extending roughly from 1860 to the present, Modernism/Modernity focuses on the methodological, archival, and theoretical exigencies particular to modernist studies. It encourages an interdisciplinary approach linking music, architecture, the visual arts, literature, and social and intellectual history. The journal"s broad scope fosters dialogue between social scientists and humanists about the history of modernism and its relations tomodernization. Each issue features a section of thematic essays as well as book reviews and a list of books received. Modernism/Modernity is now the official journal of the Modernist Studies Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信