‘I know It When I See It’: On Academic Plagiarism, and How to Assess It

Q1 Social Sciences
A. Ramalho, Marta dos Santos Silva
{"title":"‘I know It When I See It’: On Academic Plagiarism, and How to Assess It","authors":"A. Ramalho, Marta dos Santos Silva","doi":"10.1177/2347631120932238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the academic context, plagiarism is usually seen as an ethical offence, the boundaries and definition of which are often unclear. However, in some countries, plagiarism is also a legal wrong, amounting to copyright infringement. This article proposes a test for assessing plagiarism of academic works. The test is based on the law and jurisprudence of a particular country, Portugal, where plagiarism is framed as copyright infringement. Article 196 of the Portuguese Copyright Law sets four elements that must be fulfilled for a finding of plagiarism: There must be a protected work; the alleged plagiarist must have used a partial or total reproduction of that work; the alleged plagiarist must have failed to attribute the authorship of the work to its rightful creator; and the work of the alleged plagiarist must lack its own individuality. The authors argue that, even if the law of a particular country does not frame plagiarism as a legal offence, these elements should be part of a test to be adopted and applied by academic institutions for the sake of legal certainty.","PeriodicalId":36834,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education for the Future","volume":"7 1","pages":"187 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2347631120932238","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education for the Future","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631120932238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In the academic context, plagiarism is usually seen as an ethical offence, the boundaries and definition of which are often unclear. However, in some countries, plagiarism is also a legal wrong, amounting to copyright infringement. This article proposes a test for assessing plagiarism of academic works. The test is based on the law and jurisprudence of a particular country, Portugal, where plagiarism is framed as copyright infringement. Article 196 of the Portuguese Copyright Law sets four elements that must be fulfilled for a finding of plagiarism: There must be a protected work; the alleged plagiarist must have used a partial or total reproduction of that work; the alleged plagiarist must have failed to attribute the authorship of the work to its rightful creator; and the work of the alleged plagiarist must lack its own individuality. The authors argue that, even if the law of a particular country does not frame plagiarism as a legal offence, these elements should be part of a test to be adopted and applied by academic institutions for the sake of legal certainty.
“我一看到就知道”:论学术剽窃,以及如何评估它
在学术环境中,剽窃通常被视为一种道德犯罪,其边界和定义往往不明确。然而,在一些国家,抄袭也是一种法律错误,相当于侵犯版权。本文提出了一种评估学术作品抄袭的测试方法。该测试基于葡萄牙的法律和判例,在葡萄牙,抄袭被视为侵犯版权。葡萄牙《版权法》第196条规定了认定剽窃必须满足的四个要素:必须有受保护的作品;被指控的剽窃者必须使用了该作品的部分或全部复制品;被指控的抄袭者必须没有将作品的作者归属于其合法的创作者;被指控的剽窃者的作品必须缺乏自己的个性。这组作者认为,即使一个特定国家的法律没有将剽窃定义为一种法律犯罪,这些要素也应该成为学术机构为了法律确定性而采用和应用的测试的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Higher Education for the Future
Higher Education for the Future Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信