Root System Architecture and Physiological Characteristics of Soybean (Glycine max L.) Seedlings in Response to PEG6000-Simulated Drought Stress

IF 1.5 Q2 AGRONOMY
V. Esan, I. Obisesan, T. Ogunbode
{"title":"Root System Architecture and Physiological Characteristics of Soybean (Glycine max L.) Seedlings in Response to PEG6000-Simulated Drought Stress","authors":"V. Esan, I. Obisesan, T. Ogunbode","doi":"10.1155/2023/9697246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The production of soybean is restricted in sub-Saharan Africa by several stress conditions, including drought because its production is exclusively rain-fed. Identifying drought resistant varieties is of paramount importance. Thus, the objectives of this work were to (i) evaluate the effect of polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG6000) on soybean at the seedling stage, (ii) determine the root system architecture and physiological characters to water deficit stress, and (iii) establish the correlation among the quantitative variables responsible for drought tolerance in soybean varieties. Twenty soybean accessions (G1 to G20) were subjected to 10% PEG6000 concentration at seedling stages under a controlled environment using a randomized complete block design with 3 replicates. Vegetative growth data were collected. Highly significant differences \n \n \n \n P\n <\n 0.0001\n \n \n \n of proline, carotenoid, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b contents were recorded among the 20 accessions in response to PEG application. G16 and G19 had the highest carotenoid, highest chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b. The highest dry weight was observed in G16 and G10, while the number of leaves was recorded in G19 and G17. G4, G9, G10, and G13 demonstrated the highest dry weight. The PEG-simulated drought stress reduced the average root diameters and the number of lateral roots of all 20 accession plants. G1, G3, G4, G8, G9, and G15 had the longest roots than the control plants as a mechanism to withstand drought stress by seeking water in the deep. Number of leaves was significantly and positively correlated with shoot dry weight, root dry weight, and root diameter but was significantly and negatively correlated with canopy wilting. Proline content was significantly and positively correlated with carotenoid, chlorophyll content, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b. G10, G19, G9, G6, G16, G17, G20, G16, and G18 are the tolerant cultivars to drought stress on the basis of growth, physiological, and root system architecture.","PeriodicalId":13844,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agronomy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agronomy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9697246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The production of soybean is restricted in sub-Saharan Africa by several stress conditions, including drought because its production is exclusively rain-fed. Identifying drought resistant varieties is of paramount importance. Thus, the objectives of this work were to (i) evaluate the effect of polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG6000) on soybean at the seedling stage, (ii) determine the root system architecture and physiological characters to water deficit stress, and (iii) establish the correlation among the quantitative variables responsible for drought tolerance in soybean varieties. Twenty soybean accessions (G1 to G20) were subjected to 10% PEG6000 concentration at seedling stages under a controlled environment using a randomized complete block design with 3 replicates. Vegetative growth data were collected. Highly significant differences P < 0.0001 of proline, carotenoid, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b contents were recorded among the 20 accessions in response to PEG application. G16 and G19 had the highest carotenoid, highest chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b. The highest dry weight was observed in G16 and G10, while the number of leaves was recorded in G19 and G17. G4, G9, G10, and G13 demonstrated the highest dry weight. The PEG-simulated drought stress reduced the average root diameters and the number of lateral roots of all 20 accession plants. G1, G3, G4, G8, G9, and G15 had the longest roots than the control plants as a mechanism to withstand drought stress by seeking water in the deep. Number of leaves was significantly and positively correlated with shoot dry weight, root dry weight, and root diameter but was significantly and negatively correlated with canopy wilting. Proline content was significantly and positively correlated with carotenoid, chlorophyll content, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b. G10, G19, G9, G6, G16, G17, G20, G16, and G18 are the tolerant cultivars to drought stress on the basis of growth, physiological, and root system architecture.
PEG6000模拟干旱胁迫下大豆幼苗根系结构及生理特性
撒哈拉以南非洲的大豆生产受到多种压力条件的限制,包括干旱,因为其生产完全靠雨水灌溉。鉴定抗旱品种至关重要。因此,本工作的目的是(i)评估聚乙二醇6000(PEG6000)对大豆幼苗期的影响,(ii)确定根系结构和对缺水胁迫的生理特性,以及(iii)建立大豆品种耐旱性的定量变量之间的相关性。采用3个重复的随机完全区组设计,在对照环境下对20份大豆材料(G1至G20)在苗期进行10%PEG6000浓度的处理。收集植物生长数据。在20份材料中,脯氨酸、类胡萝卜素、叶绿素a和叶绿素b含量对PEG施用的反应存在极显著差异,P<0.0001。G16和G19具有最高的类胡萝卜素、最高的叶绿素a和叶绿素b。在G16和G10中观察到最高的干重,而在G19和G17中记录到叶片数量。G4、G9、G10和G13表现出最高的干重。PEG模拟干旱胁迫降低了所有20个登录植物的平均根直径和侧根数量。G1、G3、G4、G8、G9和G15具有比对照植物最长的根,这是通过在深处寻找水分来抵御干旱胁迫的机制。叶片数与地上部干重、根干重和根径呈显著正相关,但与冠层萎蔫呈显著负相关。脯氨酸含量与类胡萝卜素、叶绿素含量、叶绿素a和叶绿素b显著正相关。G10、G19、G9、G6、G16、G17、G20、G16和G18是基于生长、生理和根系结构的耐旱品种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信