Validity and reliability of five-times-sit-to-stand test with a dual task in older adults with mild cognitive impairment

IF 0.3 Q4 REHABILITATION
Perayut Chimsuwan, Kanyakon Chanabangkaew, D. Aniwattanapong, Duangporn Suriyaamarit
{"title":"Validity and reliability of five-times-sit-to-stand test with a dual task in older adults with mild cognitive impairment","authors":"Perayut Chimsuwan, Kanyakon Chanabangkaew, D. Aniwattanapong, Duangporn Suriyaamarit","doi":"10.3233/ppr-220697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Although the five-times-sit-to-stand test (FTSST) is commonly used to analyse functional capacity, in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), many activities of daily living, such as walking while holding objects, require the simultaneous performance of motor and motor tasks. Hence, the FTSST with a secondary task has been introduced, though there is a lack of evidence on its validity and reliability. This study aimed to examine the concurrent validity and reliability of the FTSST with a dual task in older adults with MCI. METHODS: Twenty-eight older adults with MCI participated in the study. All participants performed the FTSST, FTSST with a dual task and Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The concurrent validity of the FTSST with a dual task was established with the TUG. RESULTS: Moderate concurrent validity was found between the FTSST with a dual task and the TUG, with Pearson’s r = 0.59 (p <  0.001). The FTSST with a dual task exhibited good intra-rater (ICC 3,2 = 0.99) and inter-rater (ICC 2,2 = 0.99) reliability. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change of the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the FTSST with a dual task were 0.22 and 0.18, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed a significant correlation between the FTSST both with and without a dual task and the TUG as well as good inter- and intra-rater reliability when used in older adults with MCI. These findings support using these tests as outcome measures in older adults with MCI.","PeriodicalId":38170,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ppr-220697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although the five-times-sit-to-stand test (FTSST) is commonly used to analyse functional capacity, in older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), many activities of daily living, such as walking while holding objects, require the simultaneous performance of motor and motor tasks. Hence, the FTSST with a secondary task has been introduced, though there is a lack of evidence on its validity and reliability. This study aimed to examine the concurrent validity and reliability of the FTSST with a dual task in older adults with MCI. METHODS: Twenty-eight older adults with MCI participated in the study. All participants performed the FTSST, FTSST with a dual task and Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The concurrent validity of the FTSST with a dual task was established with the TUG. RESULTS: Moderate concurrent validity was found between the FTSST with a dual task and the TUG, with Pearson’s r = 0.59 (p <  0.001). The FTSST with a dual task exhibited good intra-rater (ICC 3,2 = 0.99) and inter-rater (ICC 2,2 = 0.99) reliability. The standard error of measurement and minimal detectable change of the intra- and inter-rater reliability of the FTSST with a dual task were 0.22 and 0.18, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed a significant correlation between the FTSST both with and without a dual task and the TUG as well as good inter- and intra-rater reliability when used in older adults with MCI. These findings support using these tests as outcome measures in older adults with MCI.
老年人轻度认知障碍五次坐立双任务测试的效度和信度
虽然五次坐立测试(FTSST)通常用于分析功能能力,但在患有轻度认知障碍(MCI)的老年人中,许多日常生活活动,如拿着物体走路,需要同时执行运动和运动任务。因此,引入了具有次要任务的FTSST,尽管缺乏证据证明其有效性和可靠性。本研究旨在检验老年轻度认知障碍患者FTSST与双重任务的并发效度和信度。方法:28名老年轻度认知障碍患者参与了这项研究。所有的参与者都进行了FTSST, FTSST与双重任务和计时上和走(TUG)测试。利用TUG验证了双任务FTSST的并发效度。结果:具有双重任务的FTSST与TUG具有中等的并发效度,Pearson’s r = 0.59 (p < 0.001)。具有双重任务的FTSST具有良好的评估内信度(ICC 3,2 = 0.99)和评估间信度(ICC 2,2 = 0.99)。双任务FTSST的测量标准误差为0.22,评分内信度和评分间信度的最小可检测变化为0.18。结论:本研究表明,在老年轻度认知损伤患者中,FTSST在有和没有双重任务的情况下与TUG之间存在显著的相关性,并且具有良好的评分间和评分内可靠性。这些发现支持使用这些测试作为老年轻度认知障碍患者的结果测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Physiotherapy Practice and Research Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信