Can Police Unions Help Change American Policing?

Michelle Hatfield
{"title":"Can Police Unions Help Change American Policing?","authors":"Michelle Hatfield","doi":"10.5070/cj85154813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Hatfield, Michelle M.K. | Abstract: Police unions are part of the problem in American policing. Could police unions also be part of the solution? This Comment begins by putting into practice the dialectic we must achieve at a societal level by detailing the ways in which police and Black Americans have been positioned to be in conflict from the seventeenth century to the present, and by discussing the formation of police unions. American society needs truth-telling about the history and present context that drives police officers into deadly conflict with Black Americans to heal, trust, and effectuate a more perfect system for public safety. This Comment wrestles with the need to understand several truths at once: that police organized into unions in part to protect the rank-and-file from managerial abuse; that the American policing system is in many ways designed and implemented against BlacknAmericans; that police unions organized in the Civil Rights Era to protect police officers from discipline for following orders; and that deep, structural change should include police unions. Less fundamental changes that leave in place the core of American policing, without examining its racist foundations and incentives toward brutality and lethal force, will not serve to bring about lasting reconciliation. This Comment reviews several ways to improve the management of police departments put forth by labor and policing scholars and suggests that the promise of such reforms could motivate participation in a truth process. The conversation about policing reform in the United States has expanded and deepened tremendously in the past year, and it continues to evolve and take on new dimensions. This Comment urges policymakers to create a truth process as part of police reform and suggests that the process be implemented via the police unions because the voices of police organizations that represent rank-and-file officers are a critical ingredient for meaningful change.","PeriodicalId":91042,"journal":{"name":"UCLA criminal justice law review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCLA criminal justice law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5070/cj85154813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Author(s): Hatfield, Michelle M.K. | Abstract: Police unions are part of the problem in American policing. Could police unions also be part of the solution? This Comment begins by putting into practice the dialectic we must achieve at a societal level by detailing the ways in which police and Black Americans have been positioned to be in conflict from the seventeenth century to the present, and by discussing the formation of police unions. American society needs truth-telling about the history and present context that drives police officers into deadly conflict with Black Americans to heal, trust, and effectuate a more perfect system for public safety. This Comment wrestles with the need to understand several truths at once: that police organized into unions in part to protect the rank-and-file from managerial abuse; that the American policing system is in many ways designed and implemented against BlacknAmericans; that police unions organized in the Civil Rights Era to protect police officers from discipline for following orders; and that deep, structural change should include police unions. Less fundamental changes that leave in place the core of American policing, without examining its racist foundations and incentives toward brutality and lethal force, will not serve to bring about lasting reconciliation. This Comment reviews several ways to improve the management of police departments put forth by labor and policing scholars and suggests that the promise of such reforms could motivate participation in a truth process. The conversation about policing reform in the United States has expanded and deepened tremendously in the past year, and it continues to evolve and take on new dimensions. This Comment urges policymakers to create a truth process as part of police reform and suggests that the process be implemented via the police unions because the voices of police organizations that represent rank-and-file officers are a critical ingredient for meaningful change.
警察工会能帮助改变美国的治安吗?
作者:Hatfield,Michelle M.K.|摘要:警察工会是美国治安问题的一部分。警察工会也能成为解决方案的一部分吗?本评论首先将我们必须在社会层面实现的辩证法付诸实践,详细说明从17世纪到现在,警察和美国黑人在冲突中的定位,并讨论警察工会的组建。美国社会需要讲述驱使警察与美国黑人发生致命冲突的历史和现状,以治愈、信任并实现一个更完善的公共安全体系。这篇评论试图同时理解几个真相:警察组织工会在一定程度上是为了保护普通民众免受管理层的虐待;美国警察系统在许多方面都是针对黑人美国人设计和实施的;警察工会在民权时代组织起来,保护警察遵守命令不受纪律约束;而这种深层次的结构性变革应该包括警察工会。如果不审查其种族主义基础以及对暴行和致命武力的激励,那么将美国警务核心留在原地的不太根本的变革将无助于实现持久的和解。这篇评论回顾了劳工和警务学者提出的改善警察部门管理的几种方法,并表明这种改革的承诺可以激励人们参与真相进程。在过去的一年里,关于美国警务改革的讨论得到了极大的扩展和深化,并继续发展和呈现出新的层面。本意见敦促决策者建立一个真相程序,作为警察改革的一部分,并建议通过警察工会实施这一程序,因为代表普通警察的警察组织的声音是有意义变革的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信