Debates about Educational Issues: A Pedagogical Strategy to Explore Argumentative Skills in the EFL Classroom

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Ángela Vanesa Duarte Infante, Sandra Milena Fonseca Velandia, Bertha Ramos Holguín
{"title":"Debates about Educational Issues: A Pedagogical Strategy to Explore Argumentative Skills in the EFL Classroom","authors":"Ángela Vanesa Duarte Infante, Sandra Milena Fonseca Velandia, Bertha Ramos Holguín","doi":"10.19183/how.27.1.516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article describes a pedagogical proposal, based on debates, to determine the type of arguments that pre-service English language teachers constructed at a public university in Tunja, Colombia. We implemented a series of debate workshops about educational issues. Thirteen modern languages pre-service teachers in their sixth semester participated in the debates. In each debate, we collected data through recordings, focus groups, and field notes to understand the impact of the pedagogical intervention. Findings suggest that the arguments pre-service teachers built were based on examples. In this sense, the arguments built were based on their personal experiences and their partners’ opinions. We argue for the need to implement more research proposals that will contribute to the understanding and awareness of what argumentation implies.","PeriodicalId":43460,"journal":{"name":"How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19183/how.27.1.516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article describes a pedagogical proposal, based on debates, to determine the type of arguments that pre-service English language teachers constructed at a public university in Tunja, Colombia. We implemented a series of debate workshops about educational issues. Thirteen modern languages pre-service teachers in their sixth semester participated in the debates. In each debate, we collected data through recordings, focus groups, and field notes to understand the impact of the pedagogical intervention. Findings suggest that the arguments pre-service teachers built were based on examples. In this sense, the arguments built were based on their personal experiences and their partners’ opinions. We argue for the need to implement more research proposals that will contribute to the understanding and awareness of what argumentation implies.
关于教育问题的争论:探索英语课堂辩论技巧的教育策略
本文描述了一项基于辩论的教学建议,以确定哥伦比亚通贾一所公立大学的职前英语教师构建的论点类型。我们举办了一系列关于教育问题的辩论讲习班。13名现代语言职前教师在第六学期参加了辩论。在每次辩论中,我们通过录音、焦点小组和现场笔记收集数据,以了解教学干预的影响。研究结果表明,职前教师建立的论点是基于实例的。从这个意义上说,所建立的论点是基于他们的个人经历和伴侣的意见。我们认为有必要实施更多的研究建议,这将有助于理解和意识到论证的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English
How-A Colombian Journal for Teachers of English EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信