Kabul and a Strategic Triangle

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Š. Ganguly
{"title":"Kabul and a Strategic Triangle","authors":"Š. Ganguly","doi":"10.1080/0163660X.2022.2090758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the wake of the American withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Taliban takeover, three major regional states—Pakistan, India, and the People’s Republic of China (PRC)—all have significant and overlapping stakes in the future of Afghanistan. As the Taliban struggles to govern an utterly impoverished land, all three have been carefully monitoring developments in the country. Simultaneously, they are keeping a close watch on the choices of the other two. As this essay argues, all three states are keen on ensuring that they will be able to wield a modicum of influence in the country for different as well as overlapping reasons. Pakistan’s goals will remain geostrategic: ensuring that the Taliban maintain their anti-India stance and sympathy for Islamabad’s concerns. The PRC’s interests in the country, meanwhile, will be twofold, both economic and strategic. It will look for ways to obtain access to rare earths and simultaneously attempt to ensure that pan-Islamic sentiment does not percolate from Afghanistan into its restive province of Xinjiang. Chinese and Pakistani interests in Afghanistan are likely to dovetail. Consequently, in all likelihood the US will turn to India to deal with concerns about the PRC, and also for intelligence cooperation purposes. This article will first spell out the underlying interests of all three states, discussing the strategies that they have pursued in the wake of the return of the Taliban to Kabul, and will then explore the possibilities and limits of their likely influence in the country in the foreseeable future. Finally, it concludes with a brief discussion of the implications of this strategic triangle for the United States.","PeriodicalId":46957,"journal":{"name":"Washington Quarterly","volume":"45 1","pages":"59 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Washington Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2022.2090758","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the wake of the American withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Taliban takeover, three major regional states—Pakistan, India, and the People’s Republic of China (PRC)—all have significant and overlapping stakes in the future of Afghanistan. As the Taliban struggles to govern an utterly impoverished land, all three have been carefully monitoring developments in the country. Simultaneously, they are keeping a close watch on the choices of the other two. As this essay argues, all three states are keen on ensuring that they will be able to wield a modicum of influence in the country for different as well as overlapping reasons. Pakistan’s goals will remain geostrategic: ensuring that the Taliban maintain their anti-India stance and sympathy for Islamabad’s concerns. The PRC’s interests in the country, meanwhile, will be twofold, both economic and strategic. It will look for ways to obtain access to rare earths and simultaneously attempt to ensure that pan-Islamic sentiment does not percolate from Afghanistan into its restive province of Xinjiang. Chinese and Pakistani interests in Afghanistan are likely to dovetail. Consequently, in all likelihood the US will turn to India to deal with concerns about the PRC, and also for intelligence cooperation purposes. This article will first spell out the underlying interests of all three states, discussing the strategies that they have pursued in the wake of the return of the Taliban to Kabul, and will then explore the possibilities and limits of their likely influence in the country in the foreseeable future. Finally, it concludes with a brief discussion of the implications of this strategic triangle for the United States.
喀布尔与战略三角
在美国从阿富汗撤军和塔利班接管之后,该地区的三个主要国家——巴基斯坦、印度和中华人民共和国——都对阿富汗的未来有着重大而重叠的利害关系。在塔利班努力治理这片完全贫困的土地之际,三人一直在仔细监测该国的事态发展。与此同时,他们正在密切关注另外两人的选择。正如这篇文章所说,这三个州都热衷于确保他们能够出于不同以及重叠的原因在该国发挥一定的影响力。巴基斯坦的目标仍然是地缘战略:确保塔利班保持其反印度立场,并对伊斯兰堡的担忧表示同情。与此同时,中国在中国的利益将是双重的,既有经济利益,也有战略利益。它将寻找获得稀土的途径,同时试图确保泛伊斯兰情绪不会从阿富汗渗透到其动荡的新疆省。中国和巴基斯坦在阿富汗的利益可能会吻合。因此,美国很可能会求助于印度,以应对对中国的担忧,并进行情报合作。本文将首先阐述这三个国家的根本利益,讨论他们在塔利班返回喀布尔后所采取的战略,然后探讨在可预见的未来,他们可能在该国产生影响的可能性和局限性。最后,它简要讨论了这一战略三角对美国的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The Washington Quarterly (TWQ) is a journal of global affairs that analyzes strategic security challenges, changes, and their public policy implications. TWQ is published out of one of the world"s preeminent international policy institutions, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and addresses topics such as: •The U.S. role in the world •Emerging great powers: Europe, China, Russia, India, and Japan •Regional issues and flashpoints, particularly in the Middle East and Asia •Weapons of mass destruction proliferation and missile defenses •Global perspectives to reduce terrorism Contributors are drawn from outside as well as inside the United States and reflect diverse political, regional, and professional perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信