Comparative effectiveness of tenofovir in HIV-infected treatment-experienced patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

Q2 Medicine
Hannah Ewald, Marília Santini-Oliveira, Julian-Emanuel Bühler, D. Vuichard, S. Schandelmaier, M. Stöckle, M. Briel, H. Bucher, L. Hemkens
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of tenofovir in HIV-infected treatment-experienced patients: systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Hannah Ewald, Marília Santini-Oliveira, Julian-Emanuel Bühler, D. Vuichard, S. Schandelmaier, M. Stöckle, M. Briel, H. Bucher, L. Hemkens","doi":"10.1080/15284336.2016.1261073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens for HIV infection are frequently changed. We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials (RCTs) on the benefits and harms of switching to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based regimens in ART-experienced patients. Methods: We included RCTs in HIV-infected adults comparing switching to a TDF-containing regimen with maintaining or switching to another regimen. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS, SCI, and the WHO Global Health Library. We assessed bias with the Cochrane tool and synthesized data using random-effects meta-analyses and Peto’s approach. For further analyses, we added data from a previous systematic review in treatment-naïve patients. Results: 17 RCTs with 2210 patients were included. All but one study had a high risk of bias. There was no significant association of switching to TDF-based regimens with mortality, fractures, CD4-cell count, body fat, virological failure, LDL-, and HDL-cholesterol. TDF-based regimens decreased total cholesterol (mean difference −12.05 mg/dL; 95% CI −20.76 to −3.34), trigylcerides (−14.33 mg/dL; −23.73 to −4.93), and bone mineral density (BMD; hip: −2.46%; −3.9 to −1.03; lumbar spine −1.52%; −2.69 to −0.34). Effects on estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) were inconsistent and depended on the measurement. Adding 22 RCTs from 8297 treatment-naïve patients gave consistent results with then significant reductions of LDL (−7.57 mg/dL; −10.37 to −4.78), HDL (−2.38 mg/dL; −3.83 to −0.93), and eGFR (−3.49 ml/min; −5.56 to −1.43). Conclusions: Switching to TDF-based regimens is associated with reductions of BMD and lipid levels and possibly lowered kidney function. The evidence is limited by the high risk of bias.","PeriodicalId":13216,"journal":{"name":"HIV Clinical Trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15284336.2016.1261073","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15284336.2016.1261073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens for HIV infection are frequently changed. We conducted a systematic review of randomized trials (RCTs) on the benefits and harms of switching to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based regimens in ART-experienced patients. Methods: We included RCTs in HIV-infected adults comparing switching to a TDF-containing regimen with maintaining or switching to another regimen. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, LILACS, SCI, and the WHO Global Health Library. We assessed bias with the Cochrane tool and synthesized data using random-effects meta-analyses and Peto’s approach. For further analyses, we added data from a previous systematic review in treatment-naïve patients. Results: 17 RCTs with 2210 patients were included. All but one study had a high risk of bias. There was no significant association of switching to TDF-based regimens with mortality, fractures, CD4-cell count, body fat, virological failure, LDL-, and HDL-cholesterol. TDF-based regimens decreased total cholesterol (mean difference −12.05 mg/dL; 95% CI −20.76 to −3.34), trigylcerides (−14.33 mg/dL; −23.73 to −4.93), and bone mineral density (BMD; hip: −2.46%; −3.9 to −1.03; lumbar spine −1.52%; −2.69 to −0.34). Effects on estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) were inconsistent and depended on the measurement. Adding 22 RCTs from 8297 treatment-naïve patients gave consistent results with then significant reductions of LDL (−7.57 mg/dL; −10.37 to −4.78), HDL (−2.38 mg/dL; −3.83 to −0.93), and eGFR (−3.49 ml/min; −5.56 to −1.43). Conclusions: Switching to TDF-based regimens is associated with reductions of BMD and lipid levels and possibly lowered kidney function. The evidence is limited by the high risk of bias.
替诺福韦治疗HIV感染患者的疗效比较:系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:HIV感染的抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)方案经常改变。我们对有抗逆转录病毒治疗经验的患者改用富马酸替诺福韦二吡酯(TDF)治疗方案的利弊进行了随机试验(rct)的系统评价。方法:我们纳入了艾滋病毒感染成人的随机对照试验,比较切换到含有tdf的方案与维持或切换到另一个方案。我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL、LILACS、SCI和WHO全球卫生图书馆。我们使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚,使用随机效应荟萃分析和Peto方法综合数据。为了进一步分析,我们添加了先前在treatment-naïve患者中进行的系统评价的数据。结果:纳入17项随机对照试验,共2210例患者。除了一项研究外,所有研究都有很高的偏倚风险。切换到以tdf为基础的方案与死亡率、骨折、cd4细胞计数、体脂、病毒学失败、LDL-和hdl -胆固醇没有显著关联。以tdf为基础的方案降低了总胆固醇(平均差值- 12.05 mg/dL;95% CI为−20.76 ~−3.34),甘油三酯(−14.33 mg/dL;- 23.73 ~ - 4.93),骨密度(BMD;臀部:−2.46%;−3.9 ~−1.03;腰椎−1.52%;−2.69 ~−0.34)。对估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的影响是不一致的,取决于测量。从8297例treatment-naïve患者中加入22项随机对照试验,结果一致,LDL显著降低(- 7.57 mg/dL;−10.37 ~−4.78),HDL(−2.38 mg/dL;−3.83 ~−0.93),eGFR(−3.49 ml/min;−5.56 ~−1.43)。结论:转向以tdf为基础的方案与骨密度和脂质水平的降低有关,并可能降低肾功能。证据受到高偏倚风险的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIV Clinical Trials
HIV Clinical Trials 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
1.76
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: HIV Clinical Trials is devoted exclusively to presenting information on the latest developments in HIV/AIDS clinical research. This journal enables readers to obtain the most up-to-date, innovative research from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信