A Two-Year Retr ear Retrospectiv ospective Evaluation of Cone Beam Computed aluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Indications in Pediatric, Adolescent and Adult Patients

IF 0.2 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Zeynep Betül Arslan, Esra Ceren Tuğutlu
{"title":"A Two-Year Retr ear Retrospectiv ospective Evaluation of Cone Beam Computed aluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Indications in Pediatric, Adolescent and Adult Patients","authors":"Zeynep Betül Arslan, Esra Ceren Tuğutlu","doi":"10.14693/jdi.v30i1.1469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The objective was to evaluate cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) indications and distribution in pediatric, adolescent and adult patients. Methods: A total of 1013 CBCT images were reviewed in detail from the electronic patient database. The patient’s age, gender, CBCT indications and acquisition sites, referral departments, reason for referral, incidental findings in the imaging field and the presence of artifacts in the CBCT images were all recorded. The European DIMITRA project recommendations were used to categorize CBCT indications in the children and the European Guidelines were used for adults. Results: From a total of 1013 images; 5.3% were from children, 9.2% were from adolescents and 85.5% from were adult patients. The most common indication was impacted permanent teeth in children (37%) and adolescents (34%) and impacted 3rd molars (28.7%) and implant dentistry (25.8%) in adults. While the most common regional image was taken from children (37%) and adolescents (43.4%), it was determined that CBCT was taken from the maxilla+mandible (37.7%) in adults. Conclusion: Our results show that while attention was paid to use CBCT in children and adolescents in accordance with clinical guidelines and taking into account radiation protection protocols, it was used in the adult patient group in cases where it is not superior to traditional methods.","PeriodicalId":53873,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dentistry Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dentistry Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14693/jdi.v30i1.1469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to evaluate cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) indications and distribution in pediatric, adolescent and adult patients. Methods: A total of 1013 CBCT images were reviewed in detail from the electronic patient database. The patient’s age, gender, CBCT indications and acquisition sites, referral departments, reason for referral, incidental findings in the imaging field and the presence of artifacts in the CBCT images were all recorded. The European DIMITRA project recommendations were used to categorize CBCT indications in the children and the European Guidelines were used for adults. Results: From a total of 1013 images; 5.3% were from children, 9.2% were from adolescents and 85.5% from were adult patients. The most common indication was impacted permanent teeth in children (37%) and adolescents (34%) and impacted 3rd molars (28.7%) and implant dentistry (25.8%) in adults. While the most common regional image was taken from children (37%) and adolescents (43.4%), it was determined that CBCT was taken from the maxilla+mandible (37.7%) in adults. Conclusion: Our results show that while attention was paid to use CBCT in children and adolescents in accordance with clinical guidelines and taking into account radiation protection protocols, it was used in the adult patient group in cases where it is not superior to traditional methods.
锥形束计算机断层扫描在儿童、青少年和成人患者中的适应症评估
目的:目的是评价锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)在儿童、青少年和成人患者中的适应症和分布。方法:对电子患者数据库中1013张CBCT图像进行详细分析。记录患者的年龄、性别、CBCT适应证及获取部位、转诊科室、转诊原因、影像学偶发及CBCT图像中是否存在伪影。欧洲DIMITRA项目建议用于对儿童的CBCT适应症进行分类,欧洲指南用于成人。结果:共1013张图像;儿童5.3%,青少年9.2%,成人85.5%。最常见的指征是儿童(37%)和青少年(34%)的阻生恒牙,成人(28.7%)的阻生第三磨牙和种植牙(25.8%)。虽然最常见的区域图像来自儿童(37%)和青少年(43.4%),但确定成人的CBCT来自上颌骨+下颌骨(37.7%)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,虽然在儿童和青少年中使用CBCT是根据临床指南并考虑到辐射防护方案的,但在成人患者组中使用CBCT并不优于传统方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dentistry Indonesia
Journal of Dentistry Indonesia DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信