From the pandemic to the recovery: a legal analysi

Q4 Social Sciences
B. Raganelli, Pierre de Gioia Carabellese
{"title":"From the pandemic to the recovery: a legal analysi","authors":"B. Raganelli, Pierre de Gioia Carabellese","doi":"10.18543/ed-69(2)-2021pp185-227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid pandemic has raised various legal issues, fueling the scientific debate on the relationship between fundamental rights and freedoms in the global emergency context. Moreover, a case law has started developing within the different jurisdictions. Additionally, constitutional Courts, in different countries, have ruled over potential conflicts of interest among central powers and local ones, and even some decisa of the Court of Justice of the European Union have started “blossoming” in this area. Against the backdrop of this analysis, the paper discusses the main legal problems sparked off by the declaration of the state of emergency, with a focus on the main EU jurisdictions and with glimpses of non-EU countries. The aim of this is to discuss the balance between fundamental rights and liberties in decisa in different legal systems, as well as the interpretation given to principles of proportionality of the public health measures, adequacy, precaution and loyal collaboration and the relationship between freedom and limits to public power. Bearing this in mind, the purpose of the work is to demonstrate that, first and foremost, in Europe there is room for both a formal and a substantial recognition of common rights and liberties in terms of interpretation and application of constitutional traditions, shared by the different Member States. The relevant adherence to these principles is guaranteed by the European Court of Justice. Second, the recovery after the pandemic is an open challenge. An important opportunity for Europe and its Member States is materialising, and this is to take a step forward on the bumpy path toward a European Political Union capable of strengthening a structure weakened by several earthquakes. A path and a project still plenty of pitfalls that needs to regroup around a central core increasing unification among European peoples (art. 1 TEU), which has never meant to be an alternative to national identity. \nReceived: 24.11.2021Accepted: 13.12.2021","PeriodicalId":33371,"journal":{"name":"Estudios de Deusto","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios de Deusto","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18543/ed-69(2)-2021pp185-227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Covid pandemic has raised various legal issues, fueling the scientific debate on the relationship between fundamental rights and freedoms in the global emergency context. Moreover, a case law has started developing within the different jurisdictions. Additionally, constitutional Courts, in different countries, have ruled over potential conflicts of interest among central powers and local ones, and even some decisa of the Court of Justice of the European Union have started “blossoming” in this area. Against the backdrop of this analysis, the paper discusses the main legal problems sparked off by the declaration of the state of emergency, with a focus on the main EU jurisdictions and with glimpses of non-EU countries. The aim of this is to discuss the balance between fundamental rights and liberties in decisa in different legal systems, as well as the interpretation given to principles of proportionality of the public health measures, adequacy, precaution and loyal collaboration and the relationship between freedom and limits to public power. Bearing this in mind, the purpose of the work is to demonstrate that, first and foremost, in Europe there is room for both a formal and a substantial recognition of common rights and liberties in terms of interpretation and application of constitutional traditions, shared by the different Member States. The relevant adherence to these principles is guaranteed by the European Court of Justice. Second, the recovery after the pandemic is an open challenge. An important opportunity for Europe and its Member States is materialising, and this is to take a step forward on the bumpy path toward a European Political Union capable of strengthening a structure weakened by several earthquakes. A path and a project still plenty of pitfalls that needs to regroup around a central core increasing unification among European peoples (art. 1 TEU), which has never meant to be an alternative to national identity. Received: 24.11.2021Accepted: 13.12.2021
从大流行到复苏:法律分析
新冠肺炎疫情引发了各种法律问题,引发了关于全球紧急情况下基本权利与自由之间关系的科学辩论。此外,已经开始在不同的司法管辖区内制定判例法。此外,不同国家的宪法法院已经裁定了中央权力机构和地方权力机构之间潜在的利益冲突,甚至欧盟法院的一些十分之一也开始在这一领域“蓬勃发展”。在这一分析的背景下,本文讨论了宣布紧急状态引发的主要法律问题,重点是欧盟的主要司法管辖区和非欧盟国家。其目的是讨论不同法律体系中decisa中基本权利和自由之间的平衡,以及对公共卫生措施的相称性、充分性、预防性和忠诚合作原则的解释,以及自由与公共权力限制之间的关系。考虑到这一点,这项工作的目的是表明,首先,在欧洲,在解释和适用不同成员国共有的宪法传统方面,有正式和实质性承认共同权利和自由的空间。欧洲法院保证遵守这些原则。第二,疫情后的复苏是一个公开的挑战。对欧洲及其成员国来说,一个重要的机会正在实现,这就是在通往一个能够加强被几次地震削弱的结构的欧洲政治联盟的崎岖道路上迈出一步。一条道路和一个项目仍然有很多陷阱,需要围绕一个核心进行重组,以加强欧洲人民之间的统一(第1条标准箱),这从来都不是国家认同的替代品。收到时间:2021年11月24日接受时间:2021月13日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信