Techne-Marxism: Toward a Labor-Oriented Criticism

IF 0.1 3区文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM

PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1353/phl.2022.0028

Zachary Tavlin

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Curiously, Marxist literary and art criticism often historicizes everything but the artist's labor. This essay articulates "techne-Marxism" as a critical standpoint that locates the ontological core of the artwork in conceptual and technical labor. It posits techne as the materialist substrate of art forms often explained away as part of an ideology of bourgeois taste rather than the proper bedrock of a Marxism that avoids alienating labor in a symptomology of historical structure. Ultimately, the value of techne-Marxism is its ability to synthesize socially objective knowledge about art and the critic's ability to build labor-oriented evaluative judgments out of that knowledge.

查看原文本刊更多论文

技术马克思主义:走向劳动导向的批判

摘要:奇怪的是，马克思主义文艺批评常常把一切都历史化，唯独没有把艺术家的劳动历史化。本文阐述了“技术马克思主义”作为一种批判立场，将艺术作品的本体论核心定位于概念和技术劳动。它将技术视为艺术形式的唯物主义基础，通常被解释为资产阶级品味意识形态的一部分，而不是马克思主义的适当基石，马克思主义避免在历史结构的症候学中疏远劳动。最终，技术马克思主义的价值在于它能够综合有关艺术的社会客观知识，以及评论家根据这些知识建立以劳动为导向的评价判断的能力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

PHILOSOPHY AND LITERATURE Multiple-

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： For more than a quarter century, Philosophy and Literature has explored the dialogue between literary and philosophical studies. The journal offers a constant source of fresh, stimulating ideas in the aesthetics of literature, theory of criticism, philosophical interpretation of literature, and literary treatment of philosophy. Philosophy and Literature challenges the cant and pretensions of academic priesthoods by publishing an assortment of lively, wide-ranging essays, notes, and reviews that are written in clear, jargon-free prose. In his regular column, editor Denis Dutton targets the fashions and inanities of contemporary intellectual life.