The Relationship between Evaluative Compartmentalization of Self-Structure and Psychological Health

IF 2.6 4区心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

Stress-The International Journal on the Biology of Stress Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.17547/kjsr.2022.30.4.196

Jewon Bang, A. Lim

{"title":"The Relationship between Evaluative Compartmentalization of Self-Structure and Psychological Health","authors":"Jewon Bang, A. Lim","doi":"10.17547/kjsr.2022.30.4.196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Evaluative compartmentalization is the tendency to segregate positively and negatively valenced self-beliefs into separate self-aspects. This study examined whether there were differences in reflection and personal growth based on the level of evaluative compartmentalization and differential importance.Methods: A total of 296 undergraduate and graduate students reported self-aspect test, and answered questions about reflection and personal growth via online surveys. The participants were divided based on the level (high or low) of evaluative compartmentalization and differential importance. The effects of evaluative compartmentalization and differential importance on the dependent variables were examined. The data were analyzed using two-way multivariate analysis of covariance (two-way MANCOVA).Results: The main effect of evaluative compartmentalization was significant for reflection and personal growth. The main effect of differential importance was significant for personal growth. The interaction effect of evaluative compartmentalization and differential importance was insignificant for any dependent variable.Conclusions: The findings suggest a need for intervention for integrating self-concept structure and improving differential importance for graduate and undergraduate students.","PeriodicalId":51173,"journal":{"name":"Stress-The International Journal on the Biology of Stress","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress-The International Journal on the Biology of Stress","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17547/kjsr.2022.30.4.196","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Evaluative compartmentalization is the tendency to segregate positively and negatively valenced self-beliefs into separate self-aspects. This study examined whether there were differences in reflection and personal growth based on the level of evaluative compartmentalization and differential importance.Methods: A total of 296 undergraduate and graduate students reported self-aspect test, and answered questions about reflection and personal growth via online surveys. The participants were divided based on the level (high or low) of evaluative compartmentalization and differential importance. The effects of evaluative compartmentalization and differential importance on the dependent variables were examined. The data were analyzed using two-way multivariate analysis of covariance (two-way MANCOVA).Results: The main effect of evaluative compartmentalization was significant for reflection and personal growth. The main effect of differential importance was significant for personal growth. The interaction effect of evaluative compartmentalization and differential importance was insignificant for any dependent variable.Conclusions: The findings suggest a need for intervention for integrating self-concept structure and improving differential importance for graduate and undergraduate students.

查看原文本刊更多论文

自我结构评价区隔与心理健康的关系

背景：评价区隔是指将积极和消极的自我信念分离为单独的自我方面的倾向。这项研究考察了反思和个人成长是否存在基于评价划分水平和不同重要性的差异。方法：共有296名本科生和研究生进行了自我方面测试，并通过在线调查回答了关于反思和个人成长的问题。参与者根据评估划分的水平（高或低）和差异重要性进行划分。考察了评价区隔和差异重要性对因变量的影响。采用双向多变量协方差分析（双向MANCOVA）对数据进行分析。结果：评价划分对反思和个人成长的主要影响显著。差异重要性对个人成长的主要影响是显著的。评价区隔和差异重要性的交互作用对任何因变量都不显著。结论：研究结果表明，有必要对研究生和本科生进行干预，以整合自我概念结构并提高其差异重要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Stress-The International Journal on the Biology of Stress 医学-行为科学

CiteScore

5.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The journal Stress aims to provide scientists involved in stress research with the possibility of reading a more integrated view of the field. Peer reviewed papers, invited reviews and short communications will deal with interdisciplinary aspects of stress in terms of: the mechanisms of stressful stimulation, including within and between individuals; the physiological and behavioural responses to stress, and their regulation, in both the short and long term; adaptive mechanisms, coping strategies and the pathological consequences of stress. Stress will publish the latest developments in physiology, neurobiology, molecular biology, genetics research, immunology, and behavioural studies as they impact on the understanding of stress and its adverse consequences and their amelioration. Specific approaches may include transgenic/knockout animals, developmental/programming studies, electrophysiology, histochemistry, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, neuroanatomy, neuroimaging, endocrinology, autonomic physiology, immunology, chronic pain, ethological and other behavioural studies and clinical measures.