Hanan-Allah Mohamed, Norfashiha Hashim, N. M. Yusuwan, S. M. Shamsuddin, I. Said
{"title":"BUILDING INFORMATION MODELLING (BIM) CAPABILITY IN MALAYSIAN ARCHITECTURAL PRACTICES","authors":"Hanan-Allah Mohamed, Norfashiha Hashim, N. M. Yusuwan, S. M. Shamsuddin, I. Said","doi":"10.11113/aej.v13.18551","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The wave of IR 4.0 has created a competitive environment by transforming the industry in both technical and managerial aspects. Many studies have highlighted the need for a radical shift of conventional design processes in the concept of BIM as a management and collaboration platform. Hence, an effective strategy for the BIM implementation process is needed by developing different BIM capabilities in different cascades of BIM stages. The aim of this study is mainly to investigate BIM capabilities developed by current architectural practices. Six BIM capabilities identified from extensive literature review were Design Authoring, Design Visualisation and Simulation, Design Coordination and Review, Constructability Analysis, Project Changes Management, and Collaboration and Coordination. Each BIM capability were studied according to different BIM activities that must be performed. The The findings revealed different BIM capabilities acquired by the architectural firms in three different BIM stages. For architectural firms in stage 1 BIM implementation, the most acquired BIM capability are Design Authoring, Design Visualisation and Simulation and Constructability Analysis. In BIM stage 2 practices, Constructability Analysis, Collaboration and Coordination, and Design Authoring capabilities were developed. The practices which claimed to be in stage 3 BIM dominated in terms of Design Visualisation and Simulation, Collaboration and Coordination and Design Authoring. The current BIM capabilities will be the basis to suggest critical BIM capabilities that current architectural practices in Malaysia should seek.","PeriodicalId":36749,"journal":{"name":"ASEAN Engineering Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASEAN Engineering Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v13.18551","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The wave of IR 4.0 has created a competitive environment by transforming the industry in both technical and managerial aspects. Many studies have highlighted the need for a radical shift of conventional design processes in the concept of BIM as a management and collaboration platform. Hence, an effective strategy for the BIM implementation process is needed by developing different BIM capabilities in different cascades of BIM stages. The aim of this study is mainly to investigate BIM capabilities developed by current architectural practices. Six BIM capabilities identified from extensive literature review were Design Authoring, Design Visualisation and Simulation, Design Coordination and Review, Constructability Analysis, Project Changes Management, and Collaboration and Coordination. Each BIM capability were studied according to different BIM activities that must be performed. The The findings revealed different BIM capabilities acquired by the architectural firms in three different BIM stages. For architectural firms in stage 1 BIM implementation, the most acquired BIM capability are Design Authoring, Design Visualisation and Simulation and Constructability Analysis. In BIM stage 2 practices, Constructability Analysis, Collaboration and Coordination, and Design Authoring capabilities were developed. The practices which claimed to be in stage 3 BIM dominated in terms of Design Visualisation and Simulation, Collaboration and Coordination and Design Authoring. The current BIM capabilities will be the basis to suggest critical BIM capabilities that current architectural practices in Malaysia should seek.
IR 4.0浪潮通过在技术和管理方面对行业进行变革,创造了一个竞争环境。许多研究强调,BIM作为一个管理和协作平台的概念需要彻底改变传统的设计流程。因此,需要通过在不同的BIM阶段开发不同的BIM能力来制定BIM实施过程的有效策略。本研究的目的主要是研究当前建筑实践中开发的BIM能力。从广泛的文献综述中确定的六种BIM能力是设计创作、设计可视化和模拟、设计协调和审查、可施工性分析、项目变更管理以及协作与协调。根据必须执行的不同BIM活动,对每个BIM能力进行了研究。研究结果揭示了建筑公司在三个不同的BIM阶段获得的不同BIM能力。对于处于第一阶段BIM实施的建筑公司来说,获得最多的BIM能力是设计创作、设计可视化、模拟和可施工性分析。在BIM第2阶段的实践中,开发了可施工性分析、协作和协调以及设计创作能力。声称处于第三阶段BIM的实践在设计可视化和模拟、协作和协调以及设计创作方面占主导地位。目前的BIM能力将是建议马来西亚当前建筑实践应寻求的关键BIM能力的基础。