Student Teachers’ Use of Language: Discourse Functions in Teaching-Based Reflective Writing

Q4 Social Sciences
Petra Knorr
{"title":"Student Teachers’ Use of Language: Discourse Functions in Teaching-Based Reflective Writing","authors":"Petra Knorr","doi":"10.14712/23363177.2022.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The value of reflective writing in teacher education is widely accepted and research has focused increasingly on investigating the quality of students’ reflective texts by assessing their reflective depth or breadth. Studies on student teachers’ professional vision have looked at processes of noticing relevant classroom events and reasoning about them, emphasizingthat thinking about teaching and learning is a strongly knowledge-guided process. While much empirical attention has been given to assessing students’ writing, little insight has been gained into how reflective thinking actually unfolds. The aim of this study is to examine student teachers’ discursive practices as they engage in reflective writing in the context of a teaching practicum. Data consists of reflective essays which were analysed using linguistically based qualitative coding in order to identify discourse functions in students’ texts. Findings allow a detailed description of verbal actions carried out in guided reflective writing. They also indicate that due to the situated nature of their writing, student teachers engage in affective appraisal and reasoning processes which are verbalized by using everyday as well as academic language depending on students’ zone of proximal development and their developing pedagogical content knowledge.","PeriodicalId":38228,"journal":{"name":"Orbis Scholae","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orbis Scholae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2022.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The value of reflective writing in teacher education is widely accepted and research has focused increasingly on investigating the quality of students’ reflective texts by assessing their reflective depth or breadth. Studies on student teachers’ professional vision have looked at processes of noticing relevant classroom events and reasoning about them, emphasizingthat thinking about teaching and learning is a strongly knowledge-guided process. While much empirical attention has been given to assessing students’ writing, little insight has been gained into how reflective thinking actually unfolds. The aim of this study is to examine student teachers’ discursive practices as they engage in reflective writing in the context of a teaching practicum. Data consists of reflective essays which were analysed using linguistically based qualitative coding in order to identify discourse functions in students’ texts. Findings allow a detailed description of verbal actions carried out in guided reflective writing. They also indicate that due to the situated nature of their writing, student teachers engage in affective appraisal and reasoning processes which are verbalized by using everyday as well as academic language depending on students’ zone of proximal development and their developing pedagogical content knowledge.
学生教师的语言使用:教学型反思性写作中的语篇功能
反思性写作在教师教育中的价值被广泛接受,研究越来越关注通过评估学生反思的深度或广度来调查学生反思文本的质量。关于见习教师专业视野的研究着眼于注意到相关课堂事件并对其进行推理的过程,强调对教与学的思考是一个强烈的知识引导过程。虽然很多实证研究都关注于评估学生的写作,但很少有人深入了解反思性思维实际上是如何展开的。本研究的目的是考察学生教师在教学实习的背景下从事反思性写作时的话语实践。数据包括反思性文章,使用基于语言学的定性编码进行分析,以确定学生文本中的话语功能。研究结果允许对引导反思性写作中进行的口头行为进行详细描述。他们还指出,由于他们写作的情境性,学生教师根据学生的最近发展区和他们正在发展的教学内容知识,使用日常语言和学术语言来进行情感评价和推理过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orbis Scholae
Orbis Scholae Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信