Communing with the Dead Online: Chatbots, Grief, and Continuing Bonds

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Joel Krueger, Lucy Osler
{"title":"Communing with the Dead Online: Chatbots, Grief, and Continuing Bonds","authors":"Joel Krueger, Lucy Osler","doi":"10.53765/20512201.29.9.222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grief is, and has always been, technologically supported. From memorials and shrines to photos and saved voicemail messages, we engage with the dead through the technologies available to us. As our technologies evolve, so does how we grieve. In this paper, we consider the role chatbots\n might play in our grieving practices. Influenced by recent phenomenological work, we begin by thinking about the character of grief. Next, we consider work on developing 'continuing bonds' with the dead. We argue that, for some, chatbots may play an important role in establishing these continuing\n bonds by helping us develop what we term 'habits of intimacy'. We then turn to the 'ick factor' some may feel about this prospect, focusing especially on ethical concerns raised by Patrick Stokes and Adam Buben about the risk of replacing our dead with chatbots. We argue that replacement worries\n are not as pressing as Stokes and Buben suggest. We resist these replacement worries by appealing to the 'thin reciprocity', as we refer to it, that such bots offer, as well as the fictionalist stance that we think users of the bots adopt when engaging with them. We conclude by briefly raising\n some additional concerns and highlighting future research questions.","PeriodicalId":47796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consciousness Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consciousness Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53765/20512201.29.9.222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Grief is, and has always been, technologically supported. From memorials and shrines to photos and saved voicemail messages, we engage with the dead through the technologies available to us. As our technologies evolve, so does how we grieve. In this paper, we consider the role chatbots might play in our grieving practices. Influenced by recent phenomenological work, we begin by thinking about the character of grief. Next, we consider work on developing 'continuing bonds' with the dead. We argue that, for some, chatbots may play an important role in establishing these continuing bonds by helping us develop what we term 'habits of intimacy'. We then turn to the 'ick factor' some may feel about this prospect, focusing especially on ethical concerns raised by Patrick Stokes and Adam Buben about the risk of replacing our dead with chatbots. We argue that replacement worries are not as pressing as Stokes and Buben suggest. We resist these replacement worries by appealing to the 'thin reciprocity', as we refer to it, that such bots offer, as well as the fictionalist stance that we think users of the bots adopt when engaging with them. We conclude by briefly raising some additional concerns and highlighting future research questions.
与死者在线交流:聊天机器人、悲伤和持续的联系
悲伤是,而且一直是,技术支持。从纪念馆和神殿到照片和保存的语音邮件,我们通过可用的技术与死者接触。随着我们的技术的发展,我们的悲伤方式也在不断变化。在这篇论文中,我们考虑了聊天机器人在我们悲伤的实践中可能扮演的角色。受最近现象学研究的影响,我们开始思考悲伤的性质。接下来,我们考虑与死者建立“持续的联系”。我们认为,对一些人来说,聊天机器人可能通过帮助我们养成我们所说的“亲密习惯”,在建立这些持续的联系方面发挥着重要作用。然后,我们转向一些人可能对这一前景感到的“恶心因素”,特别关注Patrick Stokes和Adam Buben提出的道德问题,即用聊天机器人取代死者的风险。我们认为,对替代的担忧并不像Stokes和Buben所说的那样紧迫。我们通过呼吁这种机器人所提供的“薄互惠”,以及我们认为机器人用户在与他们互动时所采取的虚构立场,来抵制这些替代担忧。最后,我们简要地提出了一些额外的问题,并强调了未来的研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信