Social differences in spatial perspectives about local benefits from rehabilitated mangroves: insights from Vietnam

IF 5.3 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Rachael H. Carrie, L. Stringer, Le Thi Van Hue, Nguyen Hong Quang, Dao Van Tan, C. Hackney, P. T. Nga, C. Quinn
{"title":"Social differences in spatial perspectives about local benefits from rehabilitated mangroves: insights from Vietnam","authors":"Rachael H. Carrie, L. Stringer, Le Thi Van Hue, Nguyen Hong Quang, Dao Van Tan, C. Hackney, P. T. Nga, C. Quinn","doi":"10.1080/26395916.2022.2083237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Change in mangrove extent and condition has potential consequences for social disparity in terms of who can adapt to change in ecosystem services and places perceived important for providing them. Participatory GIS can elicit spatial variation in the importance attached to ecosystem service places, but disaggregated research that can reveal difference over the small spatial extents often covered by mangroves is underdeveloped. Using mixed-methods (quantitative, qualitative and spatial) in a rehabilitated mangrove system in Vietnam, this study assesses if and why perspectives about ecosystem services and their providing places vary among households with different capacities to adapt to mangrove change.Three household groups with different adaptive capacities were characterised using quantitative adaptive capacity indicators, demographic and economic data, and trajectory interviews spanning three decades: accumulating, coping and flexible households Coastal protection was identified as beneficial by all, and sediment, habitat provisioning and food services were also frequently associated with mangroves. Only food was identified significantly more or less by different groups. Spatial hotspots generated for each group by quantifying overlap in places perceived important for providing these four services, revealed greatest difference in locations important for food. Interviews indicated change in the characteristics of mangrove localities and different abilities to adapt to them enabled some households to prosper while others struggled. We consider adaptive capacities that helped temper mangrove change, and who might be most impacted by continuing change. We conclude by identifying ways forward for rehabilitation strategies centred on local people’s differential adaptive capacity and multiple ecosystem service needs.","PeriodicalId":37104,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystems and People","volume":"18 1","pages":"378 - 396"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystems and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2022.2083237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Change in mangrove extent and condition has potential consequences for social disparity in terms of who can adapt to change in ecosystem services and places perceived important for providing them. Participatory GIS can elicit spatial variation in the importance attached to ecosystem service places, but disaggregated research that can reveal difference over the small spatial extents often covered by mangroves is underdeveloped. Using mixed-methods (quantitative, qualitative and spatial) in a rehabilitated mangrove system in Vietnam, this study assesses if and why perspectives about ecosystem services and their providing places vary among households with different capacities to adapt to mangrove change.Three household groups with different adaptive capacities were characterised using quantitative adaptive capacity indicators, demographic and economic data, and trajectory interviews spanning three decades: accumulating, coping and flexible households Coastal protection was identified as beneficial by all, and sediment, habitat provisioning and food services were also frequently associated with mangroves. Only food was identified significantly more or less by different groups. Spatial hotspots generated for each group by quantifying overlap in places perceived important for providing these four services, revealed greatest difference in locations important for food. Interviews indicated change in the characteristics of mangrove localities and different abilities to adapt to them enabled some households to prosper while others struggled. We consider adaptive capacities that helped temper mangrove change, and who might be most impacted by continuing change. We conclude by identifying ways forward for rehabilitation strategies centred on local people’s differential adaptive capacity and multiple ecosystem service needs.
红树林恢复对当地利益的空间视角的社会差异:来自越南的见解
红树林范围和状况的变化可能会导致社会差异,即谁能够适应生态系统服务和对提供这些服务至关重要的地方的变化。参与式地理信息系统可以引发对生态系统服务场所重视程度的空间差异,但能够揭示红树林通常覆盖的小空间范围差异的分类研究尚不成熟。本研究在越南恢复的红树林系统中使用混合方法(定量、定性和空间),评估了适应红树林变化能力不同的家庭对生态系统服务及其提供场所的看法是否以及为什么不同。使用量化适应能力指标、人口和经济数据以及跨越三十年的轨迹访谈,对具有不同适应能力的三个家庭群体进行了表征:积累、应对和灵活的家庭,栖息地供应和食品服务也经常与红树林联系在一起。只有食物或多或少被不同的群体显著地识别出来。通过量化对提供这四种服务至关重要的地方的重叠,为每组产生了空间热点,揭示了对食物至关重要的地方之间的最大差异。访谈表明,红树林地区特征的变化和适应能力的不同使一些家庭得以繁荣,而另一些家庭则举步维艰。我们考虑有助于缓和红树林变化的适应能力,以及谁可能受到持续变化的最大影响。最后,我们确定了以当地人的差异适应能力和多种生态系统服务需求为中心的康复战略的前进方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosystems and People
Ecosystems and People Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.30%
发文量
40
审稿时长
42 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecosystems and People is an interdisciplinary journal that addresses how biodiversity and ecosystems underpin human quality of life, and how societal activities and preferences drive changes in ecosystems. Research published in Ecosystems and People addresses human-nature relationships and social-ecological systems in a broad sense. This embraces research on biodiversity, ecosystem services, their contributions to quality of life, implications for equity and justice, and the diverse and rich ways in which people relate to nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信