Hegel and Wittgenstein

Q4 Arts and Humanities
J. Mácha
{"title":"Hegel and Wittgenstein","authors":"J. Mácha","doi":"10.36576/2660-9509.49.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I argue that Hegel and Wittgenstein, each in their own specific way, used the idea of God at the beginning of creation as a complex analogy for other kinds of beginning, most notably the beginning of philosophical thought. Hegel’s Logic describes God’s mind before the creation of the world, i.e. God’s pure thinking. For a philosopher, beginning afresh means resolving to consider this kind of abstraction from the existence of the world. Wittgenstein, by contrast, says that the idea of a creator of the world does not explain anything. It marks the terminus ad quem of asking for explanations; we must not ask further who created the creator of the world. Wittgenstein generalizes this for any kind of reasoning: “Explanations come to an end somewhere.” (PhilosophicalInvestigations: §1) Any sort of explanation must eventually arrive at its terminus ad quem, which means only that any kind of reasoning must have its logical beginning.","PeriodicalId":37413,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36576/2660-9509.49.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I argue that Hegel and Wittgenstein, each in their own specific way, used the idea of God at the beginning of creation as a complex analogy for other kinds of beginning, most notably the beginning of philosophical thought. Hegel’s Logic describes God’s mind before the creation of the world, i.e. God’s pure thinking. For a philosopher, beginning afresh means resolving to consider this kind of abstraction from the existence of the world. Wittgenstein, by contrast, says that the idea of a creator of the world does not explain anything. It marks the terminus ad quem of asking for explanations; we must not ask further who created the creator of the world. Wittgenstein generalizes this for any kind of reasoning: “Explanations come to an end somewhere.” (PhilosophicalInvestigations: §1) Any sort of explanation must eventually arrive at its terminus ad quem, which means only that any kind of reasoning must have its logical beginning.
黑格尔和维特根斯坦
我认为,黑格尔和维特根斯坦都以自己独特的方式,在创造之初使用了上帝的概念,作为对其他类型的开始的复杂类比,尤其是哲学思想的开始。黑格尔的《逻辑学》描述了上帝在创造世界之前的心智,即上帝的纯粹思维。对于哲学家来说,重新开始意味着决心从世界的存在中思考这种抽象。相比之下,维特根斯坦说,世界创造者的想法并不能解释任何事情。它标志着要求解释的终点;我们不能再追问是谁创造了世界的创造者。维特根斯坦把这一点推广到任何一种推理中:“解释在某个地方结束。”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofia
Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofia Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Cuadernos salmantinos de filosofía, publicación editada por la Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca, es una Revista científica de investigación filosófica a cargo de la Facultad de Filosofía de la mencionada Universidad. Se fundó en 1974, y se viene editando desde entonces de forma ininterrumpida, con una periodicidad anual. Pensada para el ámbito académico, publica preferentemente a profesores y doctores en filosofía, sin excluir a jóvenes investigadores que presenten un trabajo de calidad notable. Consta de tres secciones: Estudios originales (Artículos), Notas Criticas y Reseñas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信