Forced Mid-Expiratory Flow Can Predict Ventilatory Limitation and Exercise Capacity

Hundal Mandeep, Ghattas Christian, Price Lori Lyn, Lacamera Peter, U. John
{"title":"Forced Mid-Expiratory Flow Can Predict Ventilatory Limitation and Exercise Capacity","authors":"Hundal Mandeep, Ghattas Christian, Price Lori Lyn, Lacamera Peter, U. John","doi":"10.23937/2378-3516/1410104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Exercise limitation associated with most lung diseases is multifactorial and is due to complex interactions between impaired ventilatory, cardiovascular, and peripheral muscle responses. Cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs) are often required to ascertain the primary cause of exercise limitation particularly in patients with multiple co-morbidities. CPETs are generally offered only at tertiary care medical centers. Objectives: To evaluate if forced expiratory flow from 25% to 75% of vital capacity (FEF25-75%) can be used to predict both reduced exercise capacity and ventilatory limitation to exercise. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed paired CPETs and spirometry tests performed on all adult patients (> 18 years of age) in the Pulmonary Physiology Laboratory at St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center between April, 2006 and April, 2016 to explore the association between spirometric parameters and ventilatory limitation to exercise. Ventilatory limitation was defined as ventilatory reserve ≤ 15% at peak exercise. We defined reduced exercise capacity as peak oxygen consumption VO(2) < 20 mL/kg/ min. Results: FEF25-75% was strongly associated with low breathing reserve (area under the ROC curve 0.81). FEF25-75% was also significantly associated with the combined outcome of low ventilatory reserve and reduced exercise capacity. The area under the ROC curve was 0.86 (p < 0.0001) suggesting excellent predictive ability. In patients with FEV25-75% ≥ 40%, exercise limitation was much more commonly non-ventilatory in nature. In patients with mid-expiratory flow, FEV25-75% ≤ 20%, nearly 7 of 10 patients had ventilatory limitations to exercise. OriGinal researCh artiCle","PeriodicalId":91516,"journal":{"name":"International journal of respiratory and pulmonary medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of respiratory and pulmonary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2378-3516/1410104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Exercise limitation associated with most lung diseases is multifactorial and is due to complex interactions between impaired ventilatory, cardiovascular, and peripheral muscle responses. Cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs) are often required to ascertain the primary cause of exercise limitation particularly in patients with multiple co-morbidities. CPETs are generally offered only at tertiary care medical centers. Objectives: To evaluate if forced expiratory flow from 25% to 75% of vital capacity (FEF25-75%) can be used to predict both reduced exercise capacity and ventilatory limitation to exercise. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed paired CPETs and spirometry tests performed on all adult patients (> 18 years of age) in the Pulmonary Physiology Laboratory at St. Elizabeth’s Medical Center between April, 2006 and April, 2016 to explore the association between spirometric parameters and ventilatory limitation to exercise. Ventilatory limitation was defined as ventilatory reserve ≤ 15% at peak exercise. We defined reduced exercise capacity as peak oxygen consumption VO(2) < 20 mL/kg/ min. Results: FEF25-75% was strongly associated with low breathing reserve (area under the ROC curve 0.81). FEF25-75% was also significantly associated with the combined outcome of low ventilatory reserve and reduced exercise capacity. The area under the ROC curve was 0.86 (p < 0.0001) suggesting excellent predictive ability. In patients with FEV25-75% ≥ 40%, exercise limitation was much more commonly non-ventilatory in nature. In patients with mid-expiratory flow, FEV25-75% ≤ 20%, nearly 7 of 10 patients had ventilatory limitations to exercise. OriGinal researCh artiCle
强迫呼气中期流量可以预测通气限制和运动能力
背景:与大多数肺部疾病相关的运动限制是多因素的,是由于通气、心血管和外周肌肉反应受损之间的复杂相互作用。通常需要进行心肺运动测试(CPET)来确定运动受限的主要原因,尤其是在患有多种合并症的患者中。CPET通常只在三级护理医疗中心提供。目的:评估肺活量25%至75%的用力呼气流量(FEF25-75%)是否可用于预测运动能力下降和运动通气限制。方法:我们回顾性回顾了2006年4月至2016年4月在圣伊丽莎白医疗中心肺生理实验室对所有成年患者(>18岁)进行的配对CPET和肺活量测试,以探讨肺活量参数与运动通气限制之间的关系。通气限制定义为运动高峰时通气储备≤15%。我们将运动能力下降定义为峰值耗氧量VO(2)<20 mL/kg/min。结果:FEF25-75%与低呼吸储备(ROC曲线下面积0.81)密切相关。FEF25-75%也与低通气储备和运动能力下降的综合结果显著相关。ROC曲线下面积为0.86(p<0.0001),表明具有良好的预测能力。在FEV25-75%≥40%的患者中,运动限制在自然界中更常见的是非通气性。在呼气中流量患者中,FEV25-75%≤20%,近70%的患者对运动有通气限制。OriGinal研究ch artiCle
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书