Rationale and Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Bivalirudin with a Prolonged High-Dose Infusion Versus Heparin Monotherapy During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The BRIGHT-4 Trial

Zhenyang Liang, Yi Li, G. Stone, Yaling Han
{"title":"Rationale and Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Bivalirudin with a Prolonged High-Dose Infusion Versus Heparin Monotherapy During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The BRIGHT-4 Trial","authors":"Zhenyang Liang, Yi Li, G. Stone, Yaling Han","doi":"10.1097/CD9.0000000000000068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intravenous anticoagulant therapy is critical to prevent ischemic events without increasing the risk of bleeding in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Heparin and bivalirudin are the most commonly used adjunctive anticoagulant agents during PPCI. However, the superiority of the 2 most optimal regimens with these agents in patients undergoing PPCI remains controversial. The BivaliRudin with prolonged high-dose Infusion durinG PPCI versus Heparin Trial 4 (BRIGHT-4) is a large-scale, prospective, multicenter, active-control, parallel-group, open-label, randomized trial designed to test whether bivalirudin with a post-PCI high-dose infusion is superior to heparin monotherapy in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. A total of 6000 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive bivalirudin or heparin in a 1:1 ratio. Patients allocated to the bivalirudin group will be treated with a high-dose bivalirudin infusion (1.75 mg/(kg·h)) after PCI for 2 to 4 hours. In the heparin group, the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors will be reserved for the development of procedural thrombotic complications. The efficacy and safety of bivalirudin will be evaluated at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months after the randomization. The primary endpoint is a composite of all-cause death or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3 to 5 bleeding at 30 days after randomization. The BRIGHT-4 study protocol has received approval from the ethics committee of General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (Shenyang, China). The procedures set out in this protocol are in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The results will be published following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement in a peer-reviewed scientific journal (Trial registration number: NCT03822975).","PeriodicalId":72524,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology discovery","volume":"2 1","pages":"226 - 230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CD9.0000000000000068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intravenous anticoagulant therapy is critical to prevent ischemic events without increasing the risk of bleeding in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Heparin and bivalirudin are the most commonly used adjunctive anticoagulant agents during PPCI. However, the superiority of the 2 most optimal regimens with these agents in patients undergoing PPCI remains controversial. The BivaliRudin with prolonged high-dose Infusion durinG PPCI versus Heparin Trial 4 (BRIGHT-4) is a large-scale, prospective, multicenter, active-control, parallel-group, open-label, randomized trial designed to test whether bivalirudin with a post-PCI high-dose infusion is superior to heparin monotherapy in STEMI patients undergoing PPCI. A total of 6000 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive bivalirudin or heparin in a 1:1 ratio. Patients allocated to the bivalirudin group will be treated with a high-dose bivalirudin infusion (1.75 mg/(kg·h)) after PCI for 2 to 4 hours. In the heparin group, the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors will be reserved for the development of procedural thrombotic complications. The efficacy and safety of bivalirudin will be evaluated at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months after the randomization. The primary endpoint is a composite of all-cause death or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 3 to 5 bleeding at 30 days after randomization. The BRIGHT-4 study protocol has received approval from the ethics committee of General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (Shenyang, China). The procedures set out in this protocol are in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines. The results will be published following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement in a peer-reviewed scientific journal (Trial registration number: NCT03822975).
急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间长期大剂量输注双缬氨酸与肝素单药治疗的随机对照试验的原理和设计:BRIGHT-4试验
静脉抗凝治疗对于st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者进行初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI),在不增加出血风险的情况下预防缺血事件至关重要。肝素和比伐鲁定是PPCI期间最常用的辅助抗凝剂。然而,在PPCI患者中使用这些药物的两种最优方案的优越性仍然存在争议。比伐鲁定在PPCI期间长时间大剂量输注与肝素相比的试验4 (BRIGHT-4)是一项大规模、前瞻性、多中心、主动对照、平行组、开放标签、随机试验,旨在检验比伐鲁定在pci后大剂量输注是否优于肝素单药治疗STEMI患者接受PPCI。总共6000名患者将被纳入研究,并随机分配以1:1的比例接受比伐鲁定或肝素治疗。分配到比伐鲁定组的患者在PCI后给予高剂量比伐鲁定输注(1.75 mg/(kg·h)) 2 ~ 4小时。在肝素组,糖蛋白IIb/IIIa抑制剂的使用将保留用于程序性血栓并发症的发展。比伐鲁定的有效性和安全性将在随机化后30天、6个月和12个月进行评估。主要终点是随机分组后30天的全因死亡或学术研究联盟(BARC) 3 - 5型出血的综合结果。BRIGHT-4研究方案已获得中国沈阳北方战区总医院伦理委员会的批准。本议定书中规定的程序符合《赫尔辛基宣言》和良好临床实践指南的原则。研究结果将按照试验综合报告标准发表在同行评议的科学期刊上(试验注册号:NCT03822975)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信