Learning health system benefits: Development and initial validation of a framework

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Lisa C. Welch, Sarah K. Brewer, Titus Schleyer, Denise Daudelin, Rechelle Paranal, Joe D. Hunt, Ann M. Dozier, Anna Perry, Alyssa B. Cabrera, Cheryl L. Gatto
{"title":"Learning health system benefits: Development and initial validation of a framework","authors":"Lisa C. Welch,&nbsp;Sarah K. Brewer,&nbsp;Titus Schleyer,&nbsp;Denise Daudelin,&nbsp;Rechelle Paranal,&nbsp;Joe D. Hunt,&nbsp;Ann M. Dozier,&nbsp;Anna Perry,&nbsp;Alyssa B. Cabrera,&nbsp;Cheryl L. Gatto","doi":"10.1002/lrh2.10380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Implementation of research findings in clinical practice often is not realized or only partially achieved, and if so, with a significant delay. Learning health systems (LHSs) hold promise to overcome this problem by embedding clinical research and evidence-based best practices into care delivery, enabling innovation and continuous improvement. Implementing an LHS is a complex process that requires participation and resources of a wide range of stakeholders, including healthcare leaders, clinical providers, patients and families, payers, and researchers. Engaging these stakeholders requires communicating clear, tangible value propositions. Existing models identify broad categories of benefits but do not explicate the full range of benefits or ways they can manifest in different organizations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>To develop such a framework, a working group with representatives from six Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs reviewed existing literature on LHS characteristics, models, and goals; solicited expert input; and applied the framework to their local LHS experiences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The Framework of LHS Benefits includes six categories of benefits (quality, safety, equity, patient satisfaction, reputation, and value) relevant for a range of stakeholders and defines key concepts within each benefit. Applying the framework to five LHS case examples indicated preliminary face validity across varied LHS approaches and revealed three dimensions in which the framework is relevant: defining goals of individual LHS projects, facilitating collaboration based on shared values, and establishing guiding tenets of an LHS program or mission.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The framework can be used to communicate the value of an LHS to different stakeholders across varied contexts and purposes, and to identify future organizational priorities. Further validation will contribute to the framework's evolution and support its potential to inform the development of tools to evaluate LHS impact.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":43916,"journal":{"name":"Learning Health Systems","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lrh2.10380","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Health Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lrh2.10380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Implementation of research findings in clinical practice often is not realized or only partially achieved, and if so, with a significant delay. Learning health systems (LHSs) hold promise to overcome this problem by embedding clinical research and evidence-based best practices into care delivery, enabling innovation and continuous improvement. Implementing an LHS is a complex process that requires participation and resources of a wide range of stakeholders, including healthcare leaders, clinical providers, patients and families, payers, and researchers. Engaging these stakeholders requires communicating clear, tangible value propositions. Existing models identify broad categories of benefits but do not explicate the full range of benefits or ways they can manifest in different organizations.

Methods

To develop such a framework, a working group with representatives from six Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) hubs reviewed existing literature on LHS characteristics, models, and goals; solicited expert input; and applied the framework to their local LHS experiences.

Results

The Framework of LHS Benefits includes six categories of benefits (quality, safety, equity, patient satisfaction, reputation, and value) relevant for a range of stakeholders and defines key concepts within each benefit. Applying the framework to five LHS case examples indicated preliminary face validity across varied LHS approaches and revealed three dimensions in which the framework is relevant: defining goals of individual LHS projects, facilitating collaboration based on shared values, and establishing guiding tenets of an LHS program or mission.

Conclusion

The framework can be used to communicate the value of an LHS to different stakeholders across varied contexts and purposes, and to identify future organizational priorities. Further validation will contribute to the framework's evolution and support its potential to inform the development of tools to evaluate LHS impact.

Abstract Image

了解卫生系统的益处:框架的开发和初步验证
引言 在临床实践中,研究成果的实施往往无法实现或只能部分实现,即使实现了,也会严重滞后。学习型医疗系统(LHS)将临床研究和循证最佳实践融入医疗服务中,促进创新和持续改进,有望解决这一问题。实施学习型医疗系统是一个复杂的过程,需要广泛的利益相关者的参与和资源,其中包括医疗保健领导者、临床服务提供者、患者和家属、支付者以及研究人员。要让这些利益相关者参与进来,就需要传达明确、切实的价值主张。现有的模型确定了广泛的效益类别,但并没有说明各种效益或它们在不同组织中的表现形式。 方法 为了制定这样一个框架,一个由来自六个临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)中心的代表组成的工作组回顾了有关长效机制特点、模式和目标的现有文献;征求了专家的意见;并将该框架应用到他们当地的长效机制经验中。 结果 长效医疗系统效益框架包括与一系列利益相关者相关的六类效益(质量、安全、公平、患者满意度、声誉和价值),并定义了每类效益中的关键概念。将该框架应用于五个长者健康服务案例表明,该框架在不同的长者健康服务方法中具有初步的表面有效性,并揭示了该框架的三个相关方面:确定个别长者健康服务项目的目标、促进基于共同价值观的合作,以及确立长者健康服务计划或使命的指导原则。 结论 该框架可用于向不同背景和目的的利益相关者宣传长者健康服务的价值,并确定未来组织的优先事项。进一步的验证将有助于该框架的发展,并支持其为开发评估长者健康服务影响的工具提供信息的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning Health Systems
Learning Health Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
22.60%
发文量
55
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信