Sophistry in the writings of Miguel De Unamuno: between politics and pedagogy

Astine Ovsepyan
{"title":"Sophistry in the writings of Miguel De Unamuno: between politics and pedagogy","authors":"Astine Ovsepyan","doi":"10.32880/2587-7127-2023-7-7-182-192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article explores the legacy of Miguel de Unamuno, one of the most prominent Spanish intellectuals of the late 19th and ear-ly 20th centuries. Unamuno was known not only as a writer, but also as a philosopher, philologist, journalist, playwright, social activist, and educator with unique and innovative ideas for his time. The focus is on his statements about the activity of the sophists, literary and rhetorical sophistry, as well as the sophisti-cal concept of education in general. The key question is who the sophists were for Unamuno: wise men working for the benefit of the city or verbal craftsmen creating an educational danger for the citizens? In his essay “On Consequence and Sincerity”, where he discusses philosophical issues, Unamuno turns to the sphere of sophistical activity. He believed that there is a danger of be-coming dependent on some authority (sometimes false) both in education and politics. Students, like voters, are made to believe in someone else's truth, so is there not a sophist inside the teach-er and politician? Unamuno supports his point of view with an example of a man who hated politics but fell in love with the doctrines presented by his teacher. In his essay “The Exploitation of the Intelligent”, where Unamuno reflects on deceivers, he ar-gues that a sophist may win in foolish verbal tournaments but not in calm and thorough written discussions. Based on his corpus of philosophical and pedagogical essays, one can conclude that Unamuno had an ambiguous attitude towards the sophists and sophistical education. By saying that he always saw a sophist in the depths of every dogmatist and a dogmatist in the depths of every sophist, Unamuno asserts that if he had to choose, he would undoubtedly choose a sophist. It is difficult to classify Miguel de Unamuno as either an opponent or a supporter of the sophists; rather, he sympathizes with them, using their activities to construct his arguments, which sometimes resemble sophistic ones.","PeriodicalId":32993,"journal":{"name":"Hypothekai","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hypothekai","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32880/2587-7127-2023-7-7-182-192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article explores the legacy of Miguel de Unamuno, one of the most prominent Spanish intellectuals of the late 19th and ear-ly 20th centuries. Unamuno was known not only as a writer, but also as a philosopher, philologist, journalist, playwright, social activist, and educator with unique and innovative ideas for his time. The focus is on his statements about the activity of the sophists, literary and rhetorical sophistry, as well as the sophisti-cal concept of education in general. The key question is who the sophists were for Unamuno: wise men working for the benefit of the city or verbal craftsmen creating an educational danger for the citizens? In his essay “On Consequence and Sincerity”, where he discusses philosophical issues, Unamuno turns to the sphere of sophistical activity. He believed that there is a danger of be-coming dependent on some authority (sometimes false) both in education and politics. Students, like voters, are made to believe in someone else's truth, so is there not a sophist inside the teach-er and politician? Unamuno supports his point of view with an example of a man who hated politics but fell in love with the doctrines presented by his teacher. In his essay “The Exploitation of the Intelligent”, where Unamuno reflects on deceivers, he ar-gues that a sophist may win in foolish verbal tournaments but not in calm and thorough written discussions. Based on his corpus of philosophical and pedagogical essays, one can conclude that Unamuno had an ambiguous attitude towards the sophists and sophistical education. By saying that he always saw a sophist in the depths of every dogmatist and a dogmatist in the depths of every sophist, Unamuno asserts that if he had to choose, he would undoubtedly choose a sophist. It is difficult to classify Miguel de Unamuno as either an opponent or a supporter of the sophists; rather, he sympathizes with them, using their activities to construct his arguments, which sometimes resemble sophistic ones.
乌纳穆诺作品中的诡辩:政治与教育学之间
这篇文章探讨了Miguel de Unamuno的遗产,他是19世纪末和20世纪初最杰出的西班牙知识分子之一。乌纳穆诺不仅是一位作家,也是一位哲学家、语言学家、记者、剧作家、社会活动家和教育家,在他的时代有着独特而创新的思想。重点是他关于诡辩家的活动,文学和修辞的诡辩,以及一般教育的诡辩概念的陈述。关键问题是,乌纳穆诺眼中的诡辩家是谁:是为城市谋利的智者,还是为市民制造教育危险的口头能手?在他的论文《论后果与真诚》中,他讨论了哲学问题,乌纳穆诺转向了诡辩活动的领域。他认为,在教育和政治领域,依赖某些权威(有时是错误的)是有危险的。学生就像选民一样,被逼着去相信别人的真理,那么老师和政客的内心难道就没有一个诡辩家吗?乌纳穆诺举了一个例子来支持他的观点,一个人讨厌政治,但却爱上了他老师提出的教义。在他的文章《对智者的剥削》中,乌纳穆诺对骗子进行了反思,他认为诡辩家可能会在愚蠢的口头比赛中获胜,但在冷静而彻底的书面讨论中却不会获胜。根据他的哲学和教学论文的语料库,我们可以得出结论,乌纳穆诺对诡辩家和诡辩教育持模棱两可的态度。乌纳穆诺说,他总是在每个教条主义者的内心深处看到一个诡辩家,在每个诡辩家的内心深处看到一个教条主义者。乌纳穆诺断言,如果他必须选择,他无疑会选择一个诡辩家。很难将米格尔·德·乌纳穆诺归类为诡辩家的反对者或支持者;相反,他同情他们,用他们的活动来构建他的论点,有时类似于诡辩的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信