Milk Post-harvest Losses, its Causes and Mitigation Strategies along the Dairy Value Chain of Selected Milk Sheds of Ethiopia

Abera Fekata, Mitiku Eshetu, L. Fita, U. Galmessa, Tesfemariam Berhe
{"title":"Milk Post-harvest Losses, its Causes and Mitigation Strategies along the Dairy Value Chain of Selected Milk Sheds of Ethiopia","authors":"Abera Fekata, Mitiku Eshetu, L. Fita, U. Galmessa, Tesfemariam Berhe","doi":"10.18805/ajdfr.drf-318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The lack of suitable markets and spoilage are the main causes of post-harvest losses of milk and dairy products along the supply chain. Milk loss can be seen in economic, qualitative, quantitative and nutritional terms. Reduction in amount is referred to as a quantitative loss, but an economic loss is decrease in the food’s value as a result of physical loss. Methods: The study was conducted at Addis Ababa-Selale, Ambo-Waliso and Adama-Asella milk sheds with the objective to investigate milk postharvest losses, their causes and mitigation strategies along the milk sheds. Depending on their potential for dairy production, three milk sheds were purposively selected, whereas households selected randomly and proportional to their size. A total of 296 smallholder dairy producers from the districts, 16 milk collectors, 3 dairy plant processors, 35 milk retailers and 115 milk consumers were selected for semi structured interviews. The collected data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 software. Result: The majority of the respondents (92.9%) reported that the common milking equipment used for milking was plastic buckets. The total milk postharvest loss among the milk sheds were (40.5%) in Addis Ababa-Selale, (17.33%) in Ambo-Waliso and (7.24%) in Adama-Asella. As mitigation strategies for post-harvest losses, refrigerators, keeping milk in cold water and clean milk storage were practiced in the area by (1.3%), (21.2%) and (73%) of the respondents, respectively. In conclusions, total milk post-harvest loss was 21.6% in the study milk sheds. Therefore, mitigation strategies and further intervention should be implemented at each stage of milk postharvest loss, focusing on hygienic milk handling, provision of solar based refrigerators, clean milk storage and milking equipment in the study milk sheds.","PeriodicalId":89171,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dairying, foods & home sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dairying, foods & home sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18805/ajdfr.drf-318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The lack of suitable markets and spoilage are the main causes of post-harvest losses of milk and dairy products along the supply chain. Milk loss can be seen in economic, qualitative, quantitative and nutritional terms. Reduction in amount is referred to as a quantitative loss, but an economic loss is decrease in the food’s value as a result of physical loss. Methods: The study was conducted at Addis Ababa-Selale, Ambo-Waliso and Adama-Asella milk sheds with the objective to investigate milk postharvest losses, their causes and mitigation strategies along the milk sheds. Depending on their potential for dairy production, three milk sheds were purposively selected, whereas households selected randomly and proportional to their size. A total of 296 smallholder dairy producers from the districts, 16 milk collectors, 3 dairy plant processors, 35 milk retailers and 115 milk consumers were selected for semi structured interviews. The collected data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24 software. Result: The majority of the respondents (92.9%) reported that the common milking equipment used for milking was plastic buckets. The total milk postharvest loss among the milk sheds were (40.5%) in Addis Ababa-Selale, (17.33%) in Ambo-Waliso and (7.24%) in Adama-Asella. As mitigation strategies for post-harvest losses, refrigerators, keeping milk in cold water and clean milk storage were practiced in the area by (1.3%), (21.2%) and (73%) of the respondents, respectively. In conclusions, total milk post-harvest loss was 21.6% in the study milk sheds. Therefore, mitigation strategies and further intervention should be implemented at each stage of milk postharvest loss, focusing on hygienic milk handling, provision of solar based refrigerators, clean milk storage and milking equipment in the study milk sheds.
埃塞俄比亚选定奶棚乳制品价值链上的牛奶收获后损失、原因及缓解策略
背景:缺乏合适的市场和变质是供应链上牛奶和乳制品收获后损失的主要原因。牛奶损失可以从经济、质量、数量和营养方面来看。数量的减少被称为数量上的损失,但经济损失是由于物质损失导致的食物价值的减少。方法:本研究在Addis Ababa Selale、Ambo Waliso和Adama Asella奶棚进行,目的是调查奶棚采后损失、原因和缓解策略。根据他们的乳制品生产潜力,有目的地选择了三个奶棚,而家庭则是随机选择的,并与其规模成比例。共选择了来自这些地区的296家小型奶制品生产商、16家牛奶收集者、3家奶制品厂加工商、35家牛奶零售商和115名牛奶消费者进行半结构化访谈。使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)24版软件对收集的数据进行分析。结果:大多数受访者(92.9%)表示,用于挤奶的常见挤奶设备是塑料桶。奶棚采后总损失在亚的斯亚贝巴-塞拉莱为(40.5%),在安博瓦利索为(17.33%),在阿达马·阿塞拉为(7.24%)。作为收获后损失的缓解策略,该地区分别有(1.3%)、(21.2%)和(73%)的受访者采用了冰箱、冷水保存牛奶和清洁牛奶储存。总之,在研究奶棚中,采后总损失为21.6%。因此,应在采后牛奶损失的每个阶段实施缓解策略和进一步干预,重点是卫生的牛奶处理、提供太阳能冰箱、清洁的牛奶储存和研究奶棚中的挤奶设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信